Homer Thompson Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 Yes, it may have been ludicrous but with some simple checking these IP rumours seem to have no more foundation. What dead IP? Sorry. I clicked on DBs link, instead of yours. My mistake. But, going back to my follow up question, what is the Ltd company? Is that the club or the holding company? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 "Regulatory Story - Acquisition of controlling interest in The Rangers Football Club P.L.C.". London Stock Exchange. 6 May 2011. Retrieved 6 May 2011. I was looking at Craid Whyte's wikipedia page and found that this link leads to 'page not found' within the Stock Exchange website. Is history being obliterated? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 http://www.ipo.gov.uk/tmcase/Results/1/UK00001343988 Sorry Tedi, you are correct, I should have said intellectual property office. Who was the other club who owned the intellectual property first and registered it? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 As far as I am aware, it is a wholly owned subsidiary. Owned by whom? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Thompson Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 As far as I am aware, it is a wholly owned subsidiary. Which owns the club. So thats a good thing then, the IPs are owned by the club, at the moment anyway. See, its good to talk about these things So, if Ashleys games isnt connected to the IPs, what do you think he is up to? Or do you think the retail arm moving to SD is part of normal business practice? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie_B Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 Any updates from Imran Ahmed's case at the Court of Session today? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 Nae bother Stoney, the other company were the PLC Misquoting again Tedi? I thought you'd matured. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 Ashley is interested in making money and it sounds like he has a fantastic deal going with rangers. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 You want another 'yer deid' discussion, aye that is mature Stoney. How about a wee "yer more stupid than a brain dead slug" discussion? Your defence of the spivs would put you into that category. Were the revelations of the naming rights being sold for a quid a shock to you? They were to me, I knew they'd sold the name but for a quid? The point is that your club is owned by spivs whose sole intention is to maximise profit and it has been shown that they will sell anything. What will we read about being sold next? What do you think that Rangers own could be sold to fill the vultures' pockets before they sell the picked carcass to the fans? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Thompson Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 Ashley company is the sole licensee for the majority of those entries when it comes to retail, I imagine he is trying to protect his deal to sell anything connected to those brands (in a retail sense) Rangers have seen it as a way to cut costs, 50 staff + Rent, Rates and running costs for the retail arm is not insignificant, however I have no doubt the arrangement is more profitable for Ashley and other individuals than it will be for Rangers. So business as usual then? You're not concerned that this is just a move in part of a bigger "end game"? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 Any updates from Imran Ahmed's case at the Court of Session today? Only been going for 40 mins: BBCBMcLauchlin @BBCBMcLauchlin · 17s As of this morning Rangers have sold 23,361 season tickets #bbcsportscot Replied to 0 times BBCBMcLauchlin @BBCBMcLauchlin · 12m Loans were secured against Edmiston House and Albion Car Park. Alan Aummers QC claims Rangers will soon be "debt free" #bbcsportscot Replied to 0 times BBCBMcLauchlin @BBCBMcLauchlin · 14m Two recent loans totalling £1.5million owed to shareholders have not been repaid but should be within " next few weeks" #bbcsportscot Replied to 0 times BBCBMcLauchlin @BBCBMcLauchlin · 24m "Plans for refinancing of Rangers have been in place for almost a year" says Rangers QC Alan Summers Replied to 0 times BBCBMcLauchlin @BBCBMcLauchlin · 27m Alan Summers QC says "floodlights are back on at Ibrox" and that "turbulent financial period will soon be in the past" #bbcsportscot Replied to 0 times BBCBMcLauchlin @BBCBMcLauchlin · 37m Proceedings now underway #bbcsportscot 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 Ashley company is the sole licensee for the majority of those entries when it comes to retail, I imagine he is trying to protect his deal to sell anything connected to those brands (in a retail sense) Rangers have seen it as a way to cut costs, 50 staff + Rent, Rates and running costs for the retail arm is not insignificant, however I have no doubt the arrangement is more profitable for Ashley and other individuals than it will be for Rangers. So Ashley owns the licences? Is that not just selling the Intellectual property rights for a set period of time. How long does he own the exclusivity for? How long before Rangers make anything from merchandising? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 (edited) Offt, so the payday loans haven't even been repaid yet? Edited September 5, 2014 by AberdeenBud 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 BBCBMcLauchlin @BBCBMcLauchlin · 13s Court breaks for lunch. Back at 1.45 pm #bbcsportscot Replied to 0 times BBCBMcLauchlin @BBCBMcLauchlin · 14m Claims shortfall in Rangers working capital equivalent of 6,000 season tickets as prices had risen by 15-20 percent#bbcsportscot 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 Kidding aside, there could be an explanation for the pound naming rights. Maybe Ashley paid via his share purchase in some sort of deal that had to have a nominal value attached to cover the naming rights. Rangers supporters would hope so. There is still a smell of clay about again though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lodmoorhill Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 Kidding aside, there could be an explanation for the pound naming rights. Maybe Ashley paid via his share purchase in some sort of deal that had to have a nominal value attached to cover the naming rights. Rangers supporters would hope so. There is still a smell of clay about again though. I've no doubt that there is an explanation for the £1 naming rights. Wouldn't be surprised though if that explanation involved the words "dodgy", "corrupt", "shambolic", "bizarre", "laughable", "underhand", dubious", "deceitful", or possibly even "Craig Whyte" Going to be a cracking Christmas show down Govan way this year. They appear to have a total monopoly on pantomime villains at the moment. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 Like ' pink is the new black' Ashley is the New Whyte 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 The point is that your club is owned by spivs whose sole intention is to maximise profit and it has been shown that they will sell anything. What will we read about being sold next? What do you think that Rangers own could be sold to fill the vultures' pockets before they sell the picked carcass to the fans? Scrap silver is about 30p/gram at the moment. Who is the legal owner of all the silverware at Ibrox? We know there's a lot of it because the orcs are always telling us. Must be worth tens of thousands of Ibrox Naming Rights............ 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lodmoorhill Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 As I read this, it appears to have happened around August 2012, when Ashley effectively took control of 49% of Rangers Retail. It also appears to have been done before the completion of the IPO. Surely anyone investing in New Rangers shares should have been informed that the naming rights for the stadium did not belong to the club/company? The implication of this is obvious. Naming rights are a valuable asset, and non ownership could ultimately affect the perceived value of the club/company. The fact this deal has been kept under wraps from shareholders, who ultimately own the club/company makes it seem all the more dubious. A £1??? How on fucking earth can anyone justify a deal of that sort? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hipster Dufus Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 "Most of the quotes from Rangers QC Alan Summers are from sworn affidavit from Chief Executive Graham Wallace"That's an impressive amount of spin from GW. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.