bennett Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Bloody Hell, MT - you'll get nowhere on this thread with a balanced outlook like that - have a word with yourself, man! (BTW, click benny's wee link, just for giggles..) Bloody hell Norman you've been arguing against what monks has just posted for most of today, you have no shame at all. The link goes exactly where I said it would go, to a previous article posted on p and b. HTH 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 It was also clear that Guardian mocked the Sun for it's laughable stance in the defence of their actions. It's not surprising that it's reading material for Bennett and Tedi and to be taken seriously .... Roy greensnake lol, aye he's really impartial ya mentalist. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Great. That means we are due all that transfer money that went to the oldco and all the prize money that the newco never received. We are going to be quids in we? Why would No.8 pay oldco debts? Because he seems to think he's due some money. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 If you do a google search for Roy greenslade and the independent, you'll find an interesting article concerning greensnake and his affiliations. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 (edited) If you do a google search for Roy greenslade and the independent, you'll find an interesting article concerning greensnake and his affiliations. Can you not cut n paste it on here for us? Edited January 15, 2015 by dave.j 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Can you not cut n paste it? If I could then I would have. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 If I could then I would have. I can't be bothered, have you got a link at least? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottxs Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Well today is a new day so let's see how many times tedi makes an arse of himself and how many of Bennett posts involve wrk/Norman. Oh and let's see what that clusterf£&k of a club/company throws at us today . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 The way you jump on every post made by WRK is creepy..... in fact it is down right disturbing. Why not try and log off and give him some peace... or are you happy for posters to think of you as a creepy,stalking little shitebag??? They get upset that way and start stalking you, I mean Tedi is now following me around the forum just to dot me...its quite cute in a way. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottxs Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 They get upset that way and start stalking you, I mean Tedi is now following me around the forum just to dot me...its quite cute in a way.greenied to counter tedi. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crùbag Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 ....and coming up on the rails... Capture.JPG Thought the same. Apparently KingBilly liked coming up the rear. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doink Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Why is Chic Young allowed to exist? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 dave.j, on 15 Jan 2015 - 08:03, said:ImageUploadedByPie & Bovril1421309026.282664.jpg The line at the bottom of the page. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Bloody hell Norman you've been arguing against what monks has just posted for most of today, you have no shame at all. The link goes exactly where I said it would go, to a previous article posted on p and b. HTH I sometimes wonder what happens when your wee brain tries to process simple English. I've made more or less the same point as MT, which I would summarise thus: just because one side of an argument is a puddle of pish, doesn't make the other side any better. Some of us see this as a summation of the whole celtic/the rangers relationship. Neither side adds a great deal to the world - just two sets of ignorant, paranoid halfwits with similar issues expressed in a different argot. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyle Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Rangers have lodged legal papers revealing they could offer up Ibrox and Murray Park as security on another Mike Ashley loan. Is this his end game here? How exactly do Rangers plan on paying back all these loans by the way? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Brees Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 (edited) @ChrisGraham76: Notice lodged with Land Register to mortgage Ibrox and Murray Park to Ashley Despite alternative funding available. Edited January 15, 2015 by Drew Brees 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Brees Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Mike Ashley has posted notice of his intention to take out security over Rangers' Ibrox Stadium. Documents seen by STV show that Sports Direct have filed their intent to add their name to the title deeds of the ground. Ashley has 35 days to complete the application but the lodging of documents indicates the owner of Newcastle United could be set to provide a secured loan to Rangers to provide badly-needed cash. Rangers have stated they currently do not have enough cash to trade until the end of January. Ashley notice of intent does not guarantee he will be the one to provide funding to the club but the move is significant for two reasons. Firstly no other party has previously been able to secure a loan against Ibrox because of a contingent liability listed in the club's accounts. The liability relates to a case brought by Craig Whyte, who claims he is the legal owner of the asset. Secondly the move by Ashley means that should any other party step up to provide funding to the club, they would not be able to secure their loan against Ibrox as the document lodged by Ashley takes precedence. The notice of intent would first have to expire before a security could be lodged. The club were unavailable for comment when contacted by STV on Thursday morning. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 @ChrisGraham76: Notice lodged with Land Register to mortgage Ibrox and Murray Park to Ashley Despite alternative funding available. ....and popcorn back out the cupboard. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnstoun Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Rangers have lodged legal papers revealing they could offer up Ibrox and Murray Park as security on another Mike Ashley loan. Is this his end game here? How exactly do Rangers plan on paying back all these loans by the way? Investments Kyle, investments. They just need a bit of time to mature in Ally's hip pocket and Chuckie's Chateau. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.