williemillersmoustache Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Why the 54th minute ? Ooops, grin yins owed, sorry dude. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Promise? If they're winning. You won't see one. If Hearts are giving them a spanking....... maybe 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 You did MT, will give you that. Fancy a shot on our Board? I'd certainly be interested, but I fear that I'd maybe fail the school question. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 T3B offer £10M Pissing in the wind now, no? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Seems yet again the board are lying. Where are you hearing that they're now offering £10m? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenolly Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Seems yet again the board are lying. Or the 3 bears are, no one knows who's for real and who is lying anymore 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 (edited) I see increase, I don't see 10 million anywhere Edited January 15, 2015 by williemillersmoustache 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 No requirement for security. Offer (1) A hugely unpopular figure within the paying customers who is breaking SFA rules and bringing the club into disrepute offering £10M in place of security over an asset that the BOD promised never to grant. Offer (2) 3 Business men with the clubs best interest at heart, popular with the paying fans without any baggage offering £10M with no security just 2 seats on the board. Which one do you think is better? Offer (2) does not exist. They do want security over the training ground. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenolly Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Nice attempt at a smear, what is it actually based on?How do you know the board is lying, cause the 3 bears say so 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 No requirement for security. Offer (1) A hugely unpopular figure within the paying customers who is breaking SFA rules and bringing the club into disrepute offering £10M in place of security over an asset that the BOD promised never to grant. Offer (2) 3 Business men with the clubs best interest at heart, popular with the paying fans without any baggage offering £10M with no security just 2 seats on the board. Which one do you think is better? Regardless, Ashley has moved first and hard. This just seems like reactive mewling, even if it is a better offer. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenolly Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Tedi it's your blind belief of every "investor" from Murray through Whyte to Green and beyond that has aided the charlatans to rape your club 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Andy Newport @AndyNewportPA 2m2 minutes ago Statement from the Three Bears about to hit PA wires soon The Three Bears say they are willing to double their £5million loan offer to Rangers if it keeps Ibrox out of Mike Ashley's hands. The Newcastle United owner has filed documents notifying land register bosses that he plans to take out security on the stadium and Murray Park. So what security do they want for their "£10m"? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Wait...so it is ok for Ashley to trump the offer from the T3B but not ok for T3B to trump the offer from Ashley..really? Is that what's happened? I do find it hard to keep up at times. You have to admit Ashley seems to have them dancing to his tune. Ashley's 10m was the first I'd heard of anyone stumping up what's required for them to last till the end of the season 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Not Ibrox, just MP Hmmm.....the plot thickens. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat(The most tip top) Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 They gave two statements saying that would not ever give security over Ibrox....they lied. Now what are you basing your smear on? "Lied" is one way of describing it "were wrong" is another, more charitable option. Mind you even if it was their honest intention to avoid that step and genuine belief that they could avoid it their failure would still be worth you getting annoyed over. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenockRover Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 (edited) Is this on EBay or something ? Or an episode of Bargain c**t ? Actually, given that Ashley is more likely to be in a position to keep the thing going, I'm hoping for the board to go with Mummy Daddy and Baby Berr but only ONE board placement. Watching them scrape around their "wealthy mates" for continual handouts to " get back where they belong " should keep the mirthometer turning for a while. Edited January 15, 2015 by GreenockRover 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Well regardless, they now have an offer which gives them what they need on what looks like better terms. What about that 35 day thingy? Might be too late by then, does that give the board a get out? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muirkirk nil Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat(The most tip top) Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 why take more debt than you need. Bit late to ask that 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.