dave.j Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Rangers lawyers now quoting posts from Rangers Media......... How much are we paying these guys? minimum wage on zero hour contracts? Fixed that for you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dirty dingus Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Will any Seethco fan wearing the new fitba tap be seen as a scab? You couldnae make this shit up. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 £20,000 legal cost LOL 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Thompson Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 £20,000 legal cost LOL I prefer to think of it as 5715 replica tops 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
printer Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Dont know really. Although, if the rumours of Rangers having to buy back unsold stock are true then it could turn out to be pretty bad for them. Perhaps, but the general consensus is that the deal is a disaster at the profit split level, which your numbers suggest isn't actually the case. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Signed by his own people ^^^^ Was it? The Rangers Retail agreement was signed by Charlie and Co, was it not? Don't think he was ever employed by SD, but don't let the facts get in the way. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
printer Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 I prefer to think of it as 5715 replica tops 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsr Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Can anyone help with this crossword clue? 4 across "Scottish football club that cheated and died". I've got _ _ N _ E _ S so far. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Thompson Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Perhaps, but the general consensus is that the deal is a disaster at the profit split level, which your numbers suggest isn't actually the case. No. I did make a slight mistake, though. The £14 isnt the gross profit, its net. That means the gross is probably more like £30 per strip (or 60%). Now, Rangers could keep all that to themselves but they would also have to run, and pay for, a retail operation out of that money. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doink Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Dave King 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 I thought the whole deal was rewritten later when all the shop thing happened. I guess us mere mortals have no way of knowing with these gagging orders, the board will know of course. Ah possibly. Still find it hard to believe that Rangers were forced or coerced into signing the retail agreement. Maybe they made a bad decision at the time, but that's an entirely different matter. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Club 12 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Podlie Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 I thought the whole deal was rewritten later when all the shop thing happened. I guess us mere mortals have no way of knowing with these gagging orders, the board will know of course. Would reckon Ashley will have used sound advice from city lawyers drawing on previous precedents in the terms of the contracts, making them pretty much bullet proof. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Musketeer Gripweed Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Ah possibly. Still find it hard to believe that Rangers were forced or coerced into signing the retail agreement. Maybe they made a bad decision at the time, but that's an entirely different matter. It might look like a bad deal today, but when they had to take, it was the only offer on the table. Had they not taken it, they would probably be out of business today. The Rangers fans seem to be forgetting that. Beggars can't be choosers. Kinda ironic that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Ah possibly. Still find it hard to believe that Rangers were forced or coerced into signing the retail agreement. Maybe they made a bad decision at the time, but that's an entirely different matter. Exactly, the deal is actually free money. Absolutely no hassle risk or cost, but with a limited return. You can't have it all ways. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Doink 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Coz werra the peeepple. Plus DD soft loans. Picture the scene where the Celtic supporters dick off Dermot Desmond so much that calls in those loans. Un-picturable really.. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skudbook Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Bailed out by an Irish tax evader. As opposed to being sold for a pound by a Scottish one. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 The current SD contract is dated January 15, this was confirmed in court today, so his own employees were definitely complicit, now what were you saying earlier about facts? Sevco agreed to the contract. No point crying about it now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 His employees agreed the contract ^^^^ No harm in stating the facts now. The facts are Sevco agreed to the deal. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.