Ned Nederlander Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Waggy Waggy Waggy, Oi OI Oi http://forum.rangersmedia.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=288619 That post just confirms he's on the wind-up - fair play to the c'nt. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kildog Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Snafu mk2 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Waggy Waggy Waggy, Oi OI Oi http://forum.rangersmedia.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=288619 Ok, having read that, I'd now say there are two possibilities: The first is that this is indeed a wind-up. If so, fair play - it's been quite entertaining. The second is that this is not a wind-up. If so, Martin is really not the type of individual we should be mocking - I mean it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insaintee Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 no they don't, if you want to spend your spare time trying to find out who I am online by sitting searching for me come ahead I'm not going to reply to a post from you ever again because you're a weird online stalker. Yes, I'm an RM member, but do you really have to search for me to find that out. For instance, I don't search for info about you to post weirdly. And I have 33 rep from 200 posts on that forum so it doesn't seem like im a laughing stock like you make out .. I've got better things to do with my time. Really? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insaintee Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Waggy Waggy Waggy, Oi OI Oi http://forum.rangersmedia.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=288619 Wow 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sugna Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 If so, Martin is really not the type of individual we should be mocking - I mean it. Agree with this. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 (edited) Oor Martin really has The Diddies in a foment. Edited October 27, 2015 by The_Kincardine 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Oor Martin really has The Diddies in a foment. Do you mean that he has us 'in a ferment' Kincardine? 'Foment' is usually a verb, in my experience. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 Oor Martin really has The Diddies in a foment. I'll be with you in a moment. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 Do you mean that he has us 'in a ferment' Kincardine? 'Foment' is usually a verb, in my experience. Aye, but English can be elastic. I'm relaxed using 'foment' as a noun-type. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 Aye, but English can be elastic. I'm relaxed using 'foment' as a noun-type. I'm relaxed about using 'pillock' as a noun too, because it is one. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 Aye, but English can be elastic. I'm relaxed using 'foment' as a noun-type. Given this elastic approach to language, Humpty, I can understand why you'd be confused about the difference between administration and liquidation. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 Given this elastic approach to language, Humpty, I can understand why you'd be confused about the difference between administration and liquidation. Yes, this elasticity is terrific. It means you can use "old" when you in fact mean "new". It must be the key to all this doublethink they get to indulge in, when separating clubs from companies and suchlike. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 Ok, having read that, I'd now say there are two possibilities:The first is that this is indeed a wind-up. If so, fair play - it's been quite entertaining.The second is that this is not a wind-up. If so, Martin is really not the type of individual we should be mocking - I mean it. When rangers media members are calling you a keyboard licker then you really need to buy that mirror. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross. Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 Re Kings statement. It essentially reads as "People are complaining that they haven't heard from me for a while, so here I am repeating some things that I said before so that you can't say you haven't heard from me for a while". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weirdcal Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 Kings statement is simply a diversion. Keef Jackson in the record called him out regarding transparency and he's basically shifted focus to the retail deal again. Not answered anything. Just a statement of platitudes 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 Kings statement is simply a diversion. Keef Jackson in the record called him out regarding transparency and he's basically shifted focus to the retail deal again. Not answered anything. Just a statement of platitudes what do ypu want transparency on? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weirdcal Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 what do ypu want transparency on? Keith jackson called for transparency, it was one of the many things King said. Like Nomad, childs inheritance, over investing etc. It just seems someone called him out on it and he throws out that statement. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERSOUTH Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 Tick tock, tick tock..... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 Keith jackson called for transparency, it was one of the many things King said. Like Nomad, childs inheritance, over investing etc. It just seems someone called him out on it and he throws out that statement. what do you think he has not been transparent on? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.