Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

Why are TV deals we get a total of zero from the concern of SFL clubs? It is a problem for the SPL, they should have told their fans that this was the case rather than trying to act completely valiant and saying "We must protect sporting integrity". Fact of the matter is that it is the problem for those in the top tier and not those in the second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jim Spence@bbcjimspenceNeil Doncaster tells sfl that Sky, Espn and sport 5 deals at threat as contracts require RFC in spl in 2013/14 value 17.35 mill

Expand

My word. If only we had someone involved at the highest level who could renegotiate that amount to reflect the new reality of no Rangers. Say, a Chief Executive of the SPL.

I mean, if someone offered Doncaster £5k for his car and he wanted £10k, would he then write off the sale completely and claim he'd lost £10k as a result?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Grant Russell@STVGrantHutton: "What kind of game are we running here? It is corrupt."http://bit.ly/OhFsxI

Expand

1mgrant_normal.jpgGrant Russell@STVGrantStrong, strong words from Raith's Turnbull Hutton. Says SFA/SPL are threatening and lying to SFL clubs over Rangers http://bit.ly/OhFsxI

Expand

TURNBILL GETS THEM TELT AGAIN !!!biggrin.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chicks view from 2002

But I have a problem with clubs who can eject their debt by going into administration and then resume normal service in the same division while former employees - and not just players - are left drowning in a sea of debt. It is morally wrong. "

"Embarrassed by their financial hell"

"escaped the grip of a shameful death."

" It is morally wrong. "

"You don't have to be the Chancellor of the Exchequer to work out why your balance sheet is seriously unbalanced. It's written on the wall in great big neon: player wages."

"For too many years, too many average foreigners have set up camp here: over-paid, over-valued and over-here."

He knows the cause. He knows how it affects those who aren't paid what they're owed as a result. He knows it's morally wrong.

On this occasion it's probably even more morally wrong as those high wages were paid in part by cheating the Tax system and in offering EBT enhanced terms cheating other teams of potential players and cheating other competing teams out of prize money as a result of having a stronger squad.

...and yet totally different viewpoint this time round :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im calling absolute bullshit on that. What about next season? If the contracts required Rangers in the SPL then, surely, it would be every season, not just, conveniently, the one after next which, conveniently, would be acheivable if only these guys in the SFL see sense.

Cockwomble :angry:

And thats before we even get into the debate about how unbelievable it is that anyone signed off contracts with that clause in it

+1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jim Spence@bbcjimspence Neil Doncaster tells sfl that Sky, Espn and sport 5 deals at threat as contracts require RFC in spl in 2013/14 value 17.35 mill

Expand

So the SPL clubs have a full year to prepare for the loss of income then. Wish we had been afforded that luxury when we got relegated instead of a couple of weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im calling absolute bullshit on that. What about next season? If the contracts required Rangers in the SPL then, surely, it would be every season, not just, conveniently, the one after next which, conveniently, would be acheivable if only these guys in the SFL see sense.

Cockwomble :angry:

And thats before we even get into the debate about how unbelievable it is that anyone signed off contracts with that clause in it

Also, would they scrap relegation if Sevco were to finish last? Utter joke and also not the SFLs problem. F**k em. NotoNewco
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jim Spence@bbcjimspenceNeil Doncaster tells sfl that Sky, Espn and sport 5 deals at threat as contracts require RFC in spl in 2013/14 value 17.35 mill

Surely the SPL would have been smarter arranging a two year rolling contract (i.e., the required notice period for a club to leave), upto the maximum time of five years. Mind you, if it's true that the contract hasn't yet been signed then it's all immaterial.

Has anyone seen a figure suggested for what a Rangers-less SPL would be worth to TV? Some of that 17.35 million would be recouped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...