Bendarroch Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 @ThommyBhoy That's chronic 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCoist Must Stay Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 I'll get ma coat ....... TAXI !!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCoist Must Stay Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCoist Must Stay Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 I'm still waiting on a response to this from a the The Rangers fan... Nimmo Smith refers to newco and oldco throughout his lengthy report on the first stage of the hearing and also states that: "Newco is not and never has been a member of the SPL." 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCoist Must Stay Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 @ThommyBhoy That picture is very appropriate as to what is going on with Green and those supporting the new club. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ribzanelli Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 Thats 48 hours come and gone, where is the update? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 Thats 48 hours come and gone, where is the update? There ya go ! glad to help you out 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingrodent Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 Thats 48 hours come and gone, where is the update? SPL & SFA highheidyins busy getting bomb-proof letterboxes installed I reckon... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagfox Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Just met two guys in the chip(west end Glasgow boozer) . Going to chuckie with a phone app proposition. No sales in 5 years, they will win the contract 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bookies Love Me Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 My link Is this his backer with "Wealth off the radar"? :lol: :lol: Andy Kerr, president of the Rangers Supporters' Assembly, said there would be "an element of nervousness" about Murray's involvment. "Forgive Sir David? There's a fair body of people that would say no," he said."There is a proportion of people who say Sir David Murray is the root cause of the problem and we don't want him to darken our door again. Murray has been at the centre of everything up to the point where it all went wrong, so he is obviously a key source of valuable information. "If that is helpful for us, then fine. I am pretty sure the way Charles Green has been operating that he wouldn't go down that route unless he felt there was some benefit to take the club forward." Mr Green would not divulge what use he would use Edmiston House for except to say "that would be very important to my plans". Haven't we been here before? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 My link Is this his backer with "Wealth off the radar"? :lol: :lol: Haven't we been here before? Won't do it, that would be the final link to the old club for HMRC, would make it too obvious. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 SPL & SFA highheidyins busy getting bomb-proof letterboxes installed I reckon... rangers are the footballing equivelant of mohamhed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 rangers are the footballing equivelant of mohamhed. I think you are getting your religions mixed up. Was it not the other guy who was meant to have been raised from the dead? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drainfish Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 My link Is this his backer with "Wealth off the radar"? :lol: :lol: Haven't we been here before? Ah, the final key required for Phoenix legislation to be guaranteed - involvement of a previous director. Brilliant - you really couldn't make it up. HMRC round 2 - ding ding!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Double Jack D Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 My link Is this his backer with "Wealth off the radar"? :lol: :lol: Haven't we been here before? You couldn't make it up? Is Charles hoping for a second liquidation perhaps? I think all his guys have wealth off the radar, much the same as you or I do It would take a new word to describe Rangers fans if Murray ended up involved again. Gullible doesn't quite cut the mustard 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ribzanelli Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 I take it they were using the Duff n Phelps deadline calendar when they said 48 hours then? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drainfish Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 (edited) For those not familiar with HMRC phoenix company reporting. We now have all three, so it should instigate a further HMRC probe at least. http://www.hmrc.gov....ual/ins1121.htm Setting the 'phoenix' signal Successor companies are highlighted on BROCS and IDMS by the setting of the phoenix signal. The signal is set on the BROCS record by the Recovery Office only if all the criteria below are met. An associated Insolvency Compliance Unit (ICU) or office involved in similar work will generally identify successor companies which meet the criteria and ask the Recovery Office to set the signal. The criteria for setting the signal are one or more directors (including shadow directors) who are common to both the liquidated company and the successor company, and there was Revenue debt of £10,000 or more (actual or estimated) in respect of the liquidated company, and the same trade or business is carried on by the successor company. Edited September 27, 2012 by Drainfish 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Itwiznaeme Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 For those not familiar with HMRC phoenix company reporting. We now have all three, so it should instigate a further HMRC probe at least. http://www.hmrc.gov....ual/ins1121.htm Setting the 'phoenix' signal Successor companies are highlighted on BROCS and IDMS by the setting of the phoenix signal. The signal is set on the BROCS record by the Recovery Office only if all the criteria below are met. An associated Insolvency Compliance Unit (ICU) or office involved in similar work will generally identify successor companies which meet the criteria and ask the Recovery Office to set the signal. The criteria for setting the signal are one or more directors (including shadow directors) who are common to both the liquidated company and the successor company, and there was Revenue debt of £10,000 or more (actual or estimated) in respect of the liquidated company, and the same trade or business is carried on by the successor company. Does it mention anything about potential money laundering of money gained through tax dodging and ripping off over 300 other creditors on the HMRC website? Just asking. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 rangers are the footballing equivelant of mohamhed. Aye ok Mr Manning. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 For those not familiar with HMRC phoenix company reporting. We now have all three, so it should instigate a further HMRC probe at least. http://www.hmrc.gov....ual/ins1121.htm Setting the 'phoenix' signal Successor companies are highlighted on BROCS and IDMS by the setting of the phoenix signal. The signal is set on the BROCS record by the Recovery Office only if all the criteria below are met. An associated Insolvency Compliance Unit (ICU) or office involved in similar work will generally identify successor companies which meet the criteria and ask the Recovery Office to set the signal. The criteria for setting the signal are one or more directors (including shadow directors) who are common to both the liquidated company and the successor company, and there was Revenue debt of £10,000 or more (actual or estimated) in respect of the liquidated company, and the same trade or business is carried on by the successor company. Okay, everyone here knows my views on the whole Rangers/Sevco thing but I think you are barking up the wrong tree here. Is there a director or indeed shadow director who is common to both companies? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.