Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

Stolen from another forum: smile.gif

[/center]

Great this is going to go on all f**king season, every single game. The poor FOI person wont know whats hit them.

I wonder what will be the next target for the tit for tattery bampots?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.... and as an add-on to hellboy's post, there were zero compulsory staff redundancies or playing redundancies made. At a business needing to save a million a month? Tell that one to the employees of JJB Sports, Clinton Cards, or the Game chain of stores.

The seemingly endless discussions at which first team players went away to mull over the options? Fcuk sake, they should never have been allowed to mull anything over. If any other administrators had been appointed, they WOULD have done their job properly. They would have assessed the gravity of the situation, looked at staffing levels, probably sat down with Ally for a bit... but then, him, him, him and him - out the door. Cuts would have been made in non playing staff too - starting with a fcuking 'club ambassador'. JobCentre Plus before the cnut's arse had hit the street.

There should have been no going back and forward, stringing things out, first team players were in no position to dictate anything to anybody. Worst/best administration ever... it was all said on here in the days and weeks following Feb 14!

We had Duff & Phelps card marked from day one... But hey, we're just internet keyboard hard men, right Jabba?

I'm sure that plenty of Ranger fans got shot down on here by the hordes for suggesting that D&P were a bit iffy. It seems we were right all along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure that plenty of Ranger fans got shot down on here by the hordes for suggesting that D&P were a bit iffy. It seems we were right all along.

Will you follow follow your club back to RFC 2012 PLC when the sale is voided Benny?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, the wit of the Sevconian Guardian of Truth and Defender of the Oppressed. Hey, Bennett, want to know a secret?

While you come on here with your rapier ripostes and scintillating barbs of razor-sharp sarcasm,

Yer club's in the shite again. So is the Company. So are the Administrators. So is the old Company. Although, I feel that oldco/newco may be one of the first lies thrown out by BDO. Happy days, eh?

Sensible comment or defence of your mob? Nah, didn't think so. Ostrich time again.

GIRUY. laugh.giflaugh.giflaugh.giflaugh.giflaugh.giflaugh.gif

Just showing concern Norman, there was a rumour (pm) going around that you had kicked the bucket.

Also did anyone else get PM's about Magee being Jeremy Kyle material (putting it nicely)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure that plenty of Ranger fans got shot down on here by the hordes for suggesting that D&P were a bit iffy. It seems we were right all along.

Have you any links to those posts which were shot down?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will you follow follow your club back to RFC 2012 PLC when the sale is voided Benny?

Was talking about that earlier Stoney, if enough evidence is found to back up the (valid in my eyes) claims about D&P then you'd think that the sale would be null and voided.

Though that would take years and be almost impossible to sort out for a whole host of reasons, the best bet would be to refuse D&P their fee and stick it in the creditors pot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See, there's the old head-in-the-sand again. "it doesn't fit in with my version of fact, so I'll ignore it." It is relevant, because it illustrates Charlie Bhoy's attitude to your team's supporters, i.e. "They're scum, but providing I keep telling 'em what they want to hear, I'll get a few quid from 'em before I leave."

Plus ca change, le plus la meme chose.

I think you've missed what i've said, in that i'm really not interested in Greens apology or the reasons behind it,nothing to do with anyones' version of fact or fitting in with anything or "head in the sand"as you put it.. When the time comes to decide whether to invest a few quid or not i'll decide on whether the information provided in the prospectus is strong enough and viable enough to part with any money. At this moment in time though,after Whytes interviews, that is looking doubtful but as i say i'll decide at the relevant time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you any links to those posts which were shot down?

Go back and search through this thread for one, i got shot down by sheer weight of numbers by the usual suspects (as did other gers) when i dared suggest the spotlight should be turned on D&P.

Red dots galore and numerous bandwagon jumping etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure that plenty of Ranger fans got shot down on here by the hordes for suggesting that D&P were a bit iffy. It seems we were right all along.

Wasn't there a complete paucity of Rangers fans in here during D and P's tenure? I thought most of them came out the woodwork once the season kicked off no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't there a complete paucity of Rangers fans in here during D and P's tenure? I thought most of them came out the woodwork once the season kicked off no?

Most of the regular posting bears have been on here well before administration, a few joined after and have been posting regularly ever since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I might be being a bit thick here, but would there be any chance of the following happening after this evidence has been found -

Sale to Green overturned, so assets (Ibrox etc) still belong to Whyte.

Rangers still belong to Whyte, Sevco belongs to Green.

Because Whyte owns Rangers and Ibrox, Sevco will no longer be allowed to play there and have no ground.

But most importantly, that money grabbing p***k Sandaza is made redundant!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was talking about that earlier Stoney, if enough evidence is found to back up the (valid in my eyes) claims about D&P then you'd think that the sale would be null and voided.

Though that would take years and be almost impossible to sort out for a whole host of reasons, the best bet would be to refuse D&P their fee and stick it in the creditors pot.

I admire your optimism but I think our managing director has killed Sevco 5088, trying to save your toxic club by taking them over has been the ruination of us. If only he'd have just bought the assets we could have handed those back but now that we are pretending to be Rangers I think we're fcuked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure that plenty of Ranger fans got shot down on here by the hordes for suggesting that D&P were a bit iffy. It seems we were right all along.

Without trawling through the entire thread for confirmation I am still very sure of one thing though - many, many diddy (but honest tax-paying) fans who posted in the early days of this saga took one look at Duff & Phelps elastic deadlines, no redundancies policy, endless 'discussions' with the first team squad, and we immediately raised a flag. The very fact that Duff & Phelps seemed to be shoe-horned in as administrators as they appeared to be Whyte's choice also saw many 'WTF? comments on here.

My first assertion then is that right from the off, a big majority of P&B posters were pointing the finger at Haudit & Daudit. Would you argue against that?

Again, without trawling through the entire thread, I can't say for sure, but I don't remember non-Sevco posters coming down hard on Sevconians on this issue. It would seem strange that if we thought they were dodgy, we would then gang up on Sevco fans who agreed with that view. What was the reaction from non-Sevco posters? I find it hard to believe we defended Haudit & Daudit if a scunnered Sevconian also hammered into their well-dodgy looking administration technique.

Still, I'm happy to admit it is possible, a weird reaction if it did happen though.

Edited by pozbaird
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go back and search through this thread for one, i got shot down by sheer weight of numbers by the usual suspects (as did other gers) when i dared suggest the spotlight should be turned on D&P.

Red dots galore and numerous bandwagon jumping etc.

No links? Just another orc backtrack exposed is more like it. You made the point, you go back and prove it's true.

Us diddies smelled a rat when Craigy Whyte's preferred administrators were put in place, we have ridiculed them as corrupt from that day. You are now trying to claim it was you lot who were lambasted for doing the same thing we were. Every single orc was hanging on their next word, every single orc told us that the CVA would be accepted, every single orc told us that the sale of assets meant the history etc could be transfered to the company I support as my uber diddy wee team, where did they get this information? Hmmmm oh aye, it was Duff and Phelps. Those lying cheating @rses you claim to have believed all the way through this, who you have endlessly quoted as proof of a continuation between your club and my wee team. Did you call foul or did you feed off their every word ;) ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was talking about that earlier Stoney, if enough evidence is found to back up the (valid in my eyes) claims about D&P then you'd think that the sale would be null and voided.

Though that would take years and be almost impossible to sort out for a whole host of reasons, the best bet would be to refuse D&P their fee and stick it in the creditors pot.

The best bet would be to cease all football and trading operations pertaining to any club/company/organisation/institution that claims to be, or has ever been "Rangers"

Then we can let the authorities get in there and clean up this mess once and for all. It's the only way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...