The_Kincardine Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Again i'm not having a go at you, just curious. Why? What the f**k is wrong with you? Good shot. Come on, Bens. Let's all have a go at Henrick.....as long as its reasonable of course 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearwithme Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 (edited) 147 counts of betting on football and you think it still has to be proved he breached rule 22 . Of course it has still to be proved. Also we don't know in which matches he allegedly bet against his own club. You don't seem to understand the word "between" in relation to the dates regarding the alleged offences. So, we'll see what the actual situations turn out to be. Edited August 19, 2013 by Bearwithme 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Good shot. Come on, Bens. Let's all have a go at Henrick.....as long as its reasonable of course Bring it big yin! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 March 4th 2006 he played for caley in a 1.0 home defeat to Motherwell. Motherwell scored a penalty after Tokely had brought down the last man. Motherwell had earlier had a penalty turned down after Munro had fouled. Motherwell had a third penalty claim when keeper Brown brought down McDonald, but no penalty awarded. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 I wasn't mate. I clarifying my earlier 'owner makes racist comments', which you rightly said was inaccurate. Roll one up auld yin. Fair doos and thanks for your reply. I appreciate honest badinage. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLip69 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 If you read it yourself you would have noticed - Please note that there is no evidence to suggest any breach of Disciplinary Rule 23 which you highlighted to bring to my attention so not much point in doing that. This is not relevant at this moment as it says itself. I read this whole notice a few hours ago and a pretty daft thing to do have done if he is guilty, however at this moment all of this has yet to be proved. I'd would be interested to know how and where these allegations leading to the notice of complaint originated from. Is this like Karaoke, I sing the blue bits, you sing the red bits, and we harmonise on the black bits? I reckon your the online equivalent of the snotty wee first year geeks with the set square, the compass, the 6 inch ruler and the pen with both red and blue inks tucked into the breast pocket of his school blazer. The knob that changed colour for every line in his jotter because he didn't want one colour to run out before the other. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 That's wrong, the BBC are just being lazy. Read the notice of complaint it never mentions anything about when the 3 bets were placed. Your right though it could be lazy journalism ,but if you read the BBC article it is pretty specific 3 bets against his then club where placed between two dates and I am sure the last date means the last bet against his then club and then goes on later to say that he placed more bets during that time scale. The BBC wouldn't manipulate the SFA's article to say something different would they ,or has the BBC phoned the SFA to clarify on the matter and are using what the SFA has released to the BBC journalist and Black did in fact place a bet against his then club on 28th of July and the source stuck Black into the association for breaching their rules for placing bets against his then club ?. We await further clarification from the SFA . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fotbawmad Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 (edited) So the only reason he is not in breach of rule 23 is because the The Rangers won? You have to play in a deliberate fashion that would be sure to cost your team the game. Such as getting yourself sent off early on, giving away a penalty, or missing clear cut chances. If you look at the game he played against Dundee United last season. There is no way he cost his team the game. Edited August 19, 2013 by Fotbawmad 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Good shot. Come on, Bens. Let's all have a go at Henrick.....as long as its reasonable of course Bring it big yin! OK right. Let me be REALLY aggressive.. OK I have to tell you this. You are snide am I am not. OK? Got it? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 OK right. Let me be REALLY aggressive.. OK I have to tell you this. You are snide am I am not. OK? Got it? *skulks to bed* 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Is this like Karaoke, I sing the blue bits, Typical Motherwell fan then 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 There you go about rule 23 again, when it is not relevant due to being difficult to prove. Only when you can find proof on what he put his bets on. You are having a right mare lad, even when you post relevant articles you fail to read and understand them due to your overwhelming inability to see even a neutral view point, to many tales of leprechauns and goblins as a child methinks, black green and white blue opinions no grey turquoise areas ever. But even so there are 50 shades of bigot, don't you know. Your font is making my eyes itchy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Typical Motherwell fan then 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLip69 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 OK right. Let me be REALLY aggressive.. OK I have to tell you this. You are snide am I am not. OK? Got it? Bit nasty going for the jugular like that Kincardine, go for it Henrik. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Yep,I believe Craig Whyte attended one Smart fella him 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLip69 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Typical Motherwell fan then LOL, I am getting a headache trying to read that multi-coloured shite. A couple of bottles of Blue Moon while watching City and I'm about fecked. Goodnight. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Bit nasty going for the jugular like that Kincardine, go for it Henrik. No. He's a bad man 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 There you go about rule 23 again, when it is not relevant due to being difficult to prove. No shit Sherlock Only when you can find proof on what he put his bets on. You are having a right mare lad, even when you post relevant articles you fail to read and understand them due to your overwhelming inability to see even a neutral view point, to many tales of leprechauns and goblins as a child methinks, black green and white blue opinions no grey turquoise areas ever. But even so there are 50 shades of bigot, don't you know. I'm having a mare ???,the SFA wouldn't hold a hearing unless they were given evidence of rule breaching would they ?,not as if I can phone up the SFA and say a The Rangers player has being betting on games for the club he plays for and then they pull him up for it.And why the precise amount of bets on what type of fixture never mind what the bets where actually placed on. Go to bed sonny your brain must be hurting you somewhat. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Yep,I believe Craig Whyte attended one Smart fella him 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Bit nasty going for the jugular like that Kincardine, go for it Henrik. Aye Henks and I are so aggressive! How are you doing anyway, Lip? Tricky season ahead for The Well? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.