AberdeenBud Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 These people are working hard to shut the mouths of all football supporters. Not least by demanding that outlandish reinventions of language are accepted as the norm. It is a crucial part of the work for the suitably motivated. And they are not easily distracted. For example, when Haggerty recently refused to answer questions on anti-Dutch racism from 'RA sulk fans - she countered by asking what that had to do with 'well documented' anti-Irish racism in Scotland. Drip, drip, drip... And this campaign to silence football supporters voices has been going particularly well for the goon brigade lately. Hasn't it? Not quite the intended outcome I expect. But, in a tat-for-tit race to the bottom it was almost the most likely. Are congratulations due to those who are terrified of offensive language? I wont be applauding them as they work to further empower the controls this state already enjoys over its people. ^^^^^^^^ Textbook garden bigot. "all football fans" -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 "For the uninitiated, it is the equivalent of the "N" word in America, but used for the Irish Catholics in the North of Ireland and in Scotland" Agree with that line? Personally? Nope. But since I'm not a catholic I'm probably not qualified to say whether or not it's the same. That would be like me commenting on whether or not black people should be allowed to find the N word offensive. Why do you ask? Do you think it makes the Sevco fan in question any less of a scumbag bigot misogynist? (Hint: No it doesn't). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 ^^^^^^ A bigot. Stop flirting. Youll make me blush. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LunarC Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 Personally? Nope. But since I'm not a catholic I'm probably not qualified to say whether or not it's the same. That would be like me commenting on whether or not black people should be allowed to find the N word offensive. Why do you ask? Do you think it makes the Sevco fan in question any less of a scumbag bigot misogynist? (Hint: No it doesn't). Wanted to hear a celtc fans perspective on that line. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bookies Love Me Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 ^^^^^^^^ Textbook garden bigot. "all football fans" Just shows how people like him and his mates, and his counterparts at Parkhead, seriously get suppoting a football team and carry out a bigotted lifestyle confused. Small minded intolerant bigots, that goes for both sides of the "imaginary" divide the separates you. Twins from the same whore. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross. Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 (edited) "For the uninitiated, it is the equivalent of the "N" word in America, but used for the Irish Catholics in the North of Ireland and in Scotland" Agree with that line? Was always under the impression that "T**g" was the equivalent of "H*n". Given that Rangers fans tell us that the H word is deeply offensive, as well as illegal, I can see where the comparison made by Phil could be thought of as correct, even if I don't agree with it myself. Edited December 9, 2013 by Ross. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bookies Love Me Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 Wanted to hear a celtc fans perspective on that line. I'm a SCOTTISH catholic by birth. Faux Gaelic abuse doesn't bother me in the slightest, because I don't know what the f*ck they're on about and truthfully I don't want to anyway. Now, if you had to come up and call me a "Scottish catholic b*stard". I would take exception. Down here I've been called a "Scottish b*stard" (my kids are English! So is my ex-wife and present partner). Ho Hum, you get the mindless idiots everywhere. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LunarC Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 I'm a SCOTTISH catholic by birth. Faux Gaelic abuse doesn't bother me in the slightest, because I don't know what the f*ck they're on about and truthfully I don't want to anyway. Now, if you had to come up and call me a "Scottish catholic b*stard". I would take exception. Down here I've been called a "Scottish b*stard" (my kids are English! So is my ex-wife and present partner). Ho Hum, you get the mindless idiots everywhere. Good post. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LunarC Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 Was always under the impression that "T**g" was the equivalent of "H*n". Given that Rangers fans tell us that the H word is deeply offensive, as well as illegal, I can see where the comparison made by Phil could be thought of as correct, even if I don't agree with it myself. Pretty much how i see it but i don't find the "h" word offensive at all. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 Stop flirting. Youll make me blush. Aofjays would soon sort me out if i tried that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Double Jack D Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 Rangers fans appear to be backing the Rebels in this boardroom battle. Not surprising as it appears they have the backing of the "succulent lamb" MSM. What is the real choice here, are the rebels likely to have a sugar daddy willing to pump the needed millions to get the club "back where it belongs"? Or is it the most likely route to Admin/ Liquidation 2 as they are unlikely to take the harsh austerity measures requires (sale of Ibrox etc) to keep the club solvent? I suspect there is no sugar daddy. I mean it's a public company, if someone wanted to buy a controlling stake they could probably do so for the price of a Tore Andre Flo. The rate the club is losing money can only mean they either have to raise funds, reduce costs or they will collapse. If the fans are backing the rebels, are they choosing the risk of collapse as the rebels manifesto includes nothing that convinces us of the other two? What a shite predicament to be in, christ even my shitey wee club made some money last year lol. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 Feel free to employ the services of Google - fill your boots. Standard response of a loudmouth who can't back up his claims. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 Personally? Nope. But since I'm not a catholic I'm probably not qualified to say whether or not it's the same. That would be like me commenting on whether or not black people should be allowed to find the N word offensive. Why do you ask? Do you think it makes the Sevco fan in question any less of a scumbag bigot misogynist? (Hint: No it doesn't). It's a load of shite. Phil blocked me on twitter when I was telling him how much shite he was talking regarding his new book. Funny enough he said in a newspaper article he owes Scotland morning as he is Irish. And get when I asked if he truly believes he owes Scotland nothing, then why the obsession with it? He was comparing modern day Catholics living in Scotland as Black Americans during the 50's and 60's Unfortunately I didn't get a reply, just abuse from his little fanboys 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apache Don Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 (edited) Rangers fans appear to be backing the Rebels in this boardroom battle. Not surprising as it appears they have the backing of the "succulent lamb" MSM. What is the real choice here, are the rebels likely to have a sugar daddy willing to pump the needed millions to get the club "back where it belongs"? Or is it the most likely route to Admin/ Liquidation 2 as they are unlikely to take the harsh austerity measures requires (sale of Ibrox etc) to keep the club solvent? I suspect there is no sugar daddy. I mean it's a public company, if someone wanted to buy a controlling stake they could probably do so for the price of a Tore Andre Flo. The rate the club is losing money can only mean they either have to raise funds, reduce costs or they will collapse. If the fans are backing the rebels, are they choosing the risk of collapse as the rebels manifesto includes nothing that convinces us of the other two? What a shite predicament to be in, christ even my shitey wee club made some money last year lol. What of Dave 'The Heir Apparent' King? Does he not have a lot of disposable sugar? He certainly seems to drip loads when he opens his mouth. Oh no, not sugar. Sorry Edited December 9, 2013 by Apache Don 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 Aofjays would soon sort me out if i tried that. You make him blush as much as you want benny. Wouldn't dream of stopping you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 It doesn't just lack class. It's sick and disgusting. What kind of people are they? Doubt it will come to anything 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apache Don Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 Rangers fans appear to be backing the Rebels in this boardroom battle. Not surprising as it appears they have the backing of the "succulent lamb" MSM. What is the real choice here, are the rebels likely to have a sugar daddy willing to pump the needed millions to get the club "back where it belongs"? Or is it the most likely route to Admin/ Liquidation 2 as they are unlikely to take the harsh austerity measures requires (sale of Ibrox etc) to keep the club solvent? I suspect there is no sugar daddy. I mean it's a public company, if someone wanted to buy a controlling stake they could probably do so for the price of a Tore Andre Flo. The rate the club is losing money can only mean they either have to raise funds, reduce costs or they will collapse. If the fans are backing the rebels, are they choosing the risk of collapse as the rebels manifesto includes nothing that convinces us of the other two? What a shite predicament to be in, christ even my shitey wee club made some money last year lol. After much thought, I would prefer the current board to emerge victorious. This would then lead to either the fans' boycott totally ruining any hope of the club reaching the top flight in straight seasons, or (almost as much fun) the rest of us taunting them mercilessly about their massive & humiliating about turn. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotfromFifehonest Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 After much thought, I would prefer the current board to emerge victorious. This would then lead to either the fans' boycott totally ruining any hope of the club reaching the top flight in straight seasons, or (almost as much fun) the rest of us taunting them mercilessly about their massive & humiliating about turn. After much thought, I would prefer the current board to emerge victorious. This would then lead to either the fans' boycott totally ruining any hope of the club reaching the top flight in straight seasons, or (almost as much fun) the rest of us taunting them mercilessly about their massive & humiliating about turn. It would indeed be interesting to see how the two No.8s would justify his new-found acceptance and respect for the bus boyz. His original statement was that he would 'walk away' if the Easdales were to gain a significant say in the running of the clone rangers. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Revolutionary- Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 Doubt it will come to anything ImageUploadedByPie & Bovril1386608093.948489.jpg Where's this list then? And by what fans group? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 These people are working hard to shut the mouths of all football supporters. Not least by demanding that outlandish reinventions of language are accepted as the norm. It is a crucial part of the work for the suitably motivated. And they are not easily distracted. For example, when Haggerty recently refused to answer questions on anti-Dutch racism from 'RA sulk fans - she countered by asking what that had to do with 'well documented' anti-Irish racism in Scotland. Drip, drip, drip... And this campaign to silence football supporters voices has been going particularly well for the goon brigade lately. Hasn't it? Not quite the intended outcome I expect. But, in a tat-for-tit race to the bottom it was almost the most likely. Are congratulations due to those who are terrified of offensive language? I wont be applauding them as they work to further empower the controls this state already enjoys over its people. just the fan(nie)s of 2 clubs, who use a bizarre corruption of 'freedom of speech' to justify their medieval bile and social obscenity. The rest of us in the sane world would welcome an end to it all. anyways, it seems The Rangers Admin / Liquidation debate has been hijacked once again by bigot ping-pong. This AGM is going to be fun,eh? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.