Monkey Tennis Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 I have always suspected Stevie Smith was signed as a cheap replacement for Wallace. Christ, McCoist's not waving; he's drowning. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weirdcal Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 {style_image_url}/attachicon.gif ImageUploadedByPie & Bovril1390003401.940913.jpg Na he will just get mcculloch to do it He was always good at giving folk the elbow. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 He has certainly been involved in the squads. I have always suspected Stevie Smith was signed as a cheap replacement for Wallace. There's your mistake. If Ally was to replace their best player, a left back, he'd do it with a right sided centre half. Unless of course that right sided centre half is, for some reason, playing on the right wing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scary Bear Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 Is Keith Jackson this year's Jim Traynor? Answers on a postcard please to ... Big trousers to fill. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 Could they not go to Ticketus and get an advance against the next few years season ticket money? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenockRover Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 Loving the "chat" from fat Sally about him not being the one who's going to sell players... He has to be THE most weasely little, ten faced, responsibility dodging, rabble-rouser this side of the universe. So suited to that club though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 Although, I'd take a Scottish Cup tie this year, for a laugh. I'd fancy 9-0 as a scoreline. You are mixing us up with Aiberdeen.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 Oh so the Easdales are selling the bus company...Well i suppose that is one way of putting it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 Although, I'd take a Scottish Cup tie this year, for a laugh. I'd fancy 9-0 as a scoreline. I know we are scoring for fun in the lower leagues but i just cant see Rangers knocking 9 past celtic. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BossHogg Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 Oh so the Easdales are selling the bus company...Well i suppose that is one way of putting it. Is it just the company they're selling? Do the buses retain their history? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 Loving the "chat" from fat Sally about him not being the one who's going to sell players... He has to be THE most weasely little, ten faced, responsibility dodging, rabble-rouser this side of the universe. So suited to that club though. Bingo. It's not me, it's the club. Or is it the company? Tie yourself in knots you fat fat w**k, you're fooling nobody. Do you mean you're not out in the street with a bit of roped tied round McElbows, trying to swap him for some magic beans? In the herald today Ian Hart was defending Stockbridge, "players when they come to Ibrox expect higher wages." Aye when you offer them a contract with wages higher than everyone else, you sign it, then yes they do expect these higher wages, don' they. Cheats. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 Yes, but my point is that leasing back the ground is surely much less unthinkable than was liquidation. They went through a liquidation FFS. Liquidation! They went tits up, bust. And yet within three months of holding up red cards to the very notion and chasing the yank who'd been prepared to countenance it, they were delighting in Green' s 'Then, now and forever' banners, while making a point of saying 54 titles whenever they could. Rangers fans have already accepted, embraced and denied a much bigger hurdle than having to pay rent - that's all I'm saying. You are correct, except that the fans have not 'accepted' or 'embraced' that Rangers was liquidated. Just "denied". They still maintain that the club was not liquidated. Really, they do. If The Big Hoose were to be sold and leased back they couldn't disbelieve it..........................................................or could they? Maybe if all the properties were simply sold and they had to play somewhere else, now THAT would be funny. These 3 investment companies that have got involved are not there to try to make money from footballing success. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingrodent Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 You are mixing us up with Aiberdeen.... Have you seen Aberdeen recently Bennett? They'd hound your team, given the chance. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 Is it just the company they're selling? Do the buses retain their history? Can you sell something you don't fully own? To be more exact can you sell something you haven't paid for in full? £20 million into Rangers my arse. I am thinking of selling my rescue package story to the record...'Renfrewshire Taxi Driver to Invest £100 million into Rangers'...It is as believable and at least i fully own my taxi. Shower of lying b*****ds. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 Hart speaking to Spiers "Charles also had a vision for Rangers, but the circumstances were very difficult. First, it was unfortunate who he had to acquire the club from. Charles managed to get the shares off Craig Whyte, and that was pretty difficult. Whyte wasn't willing to sell to others, such as the Blue Knights, but Charles did that deal and got money into the club. So credit to him for that, and for the IPO launch. OK, it's history now BUT why wouldn't Whyte want to sell to a specific group? It shouldn't make any difference to him. Unless of course there was some sort of pre-arranged deal further down the line. I can't remember the ins and outs of it any more. I do hope a decent journalist is keeping tabs on all this with a book in mind. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 You are correct, except that the fans have not 'accepted' or 'embraced' that Rangers was liquidated. Just "denied". They still maintain that the club was not liquidated. Really, they do. If The Big Hoose were to be sold and leased back they couldn't disbelieve it..........................................................or could they? Maybe if all the properties were simply sold and they had to play somewhere else, now THAT would be funny. These 3 investment companies that have got involved are not there to try to make money from footballing success. I think they've accepted that liquidation occurred; they just interpret it oddly because it suits them to do so. Yes, moving ground would be a shock as it's one of the tenets of their belief in a seamless continuation. Plenty of clubs have moved ground before though, so I'm sure it too would be swallowed - not that there's any chance of it happening. My point is that of the possible fates which may await them, none are worse than a frigging liquidation. They've managed to ignore one of those so are surely capable of any convenient pretence at all. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dasodaha Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 And this 'strong' club needs to be aided by the authorities in order to dominate? Are YOU serious? I'll give you the benefit of the doubt but you are shaping up to be a bit of a tit. And yes, I do believe Scottish football will do fine without The New Rangers. Football is far too popular in Scotland to cease to exist just because one club is no longer there. Cheers, it means a lot. I was worried sick. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 Cheers, it means a lot. I was worried sick. I'm stopping your benefit. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 Can you sell something you don't fully own? To be more exact can you sell something you haven't paid for in full? £20 million into Rangers my arse. I am thinking of selling my rescue package story to the record...'Renfrewshire Taxi Driver to Invest £100 million into Rangers'...It is as believable and at least i fully own my taxi. Shower of lying b*****ds. Maybe you could buy the bus company using a loan from Ticketus based on future bus ticket sales. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beermonkey Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 Can you sell something you don't fully own? To be more exact can you sell something you haven't paid for in full? £20 million into Rangers my arse. I am thinking of selling my rescue package story to the record...'Renfrewshire Taxi Driver to Invest £100 million into Rangers'...It is as believable and at least i fully own my taxi. Shower of lying b*****ds. Like history you mean ? or a club that's separate from a company? Is that the sort of thing you mean ? Is it ? Is it ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.