Bendarroch Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 What the law are recognising today Is that right, aye? FFS 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 We can afford the players wages, our players wages is like 30/35% of our turnover which is actually extremely good and most big teams would give anything for that. It's where the rest of that money is going which is the problem, not the wages. Whatever you may think of Murray, Whyte, Green, The Bus Boys, et al., they really love people like you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Can some timposters nip on and tell them that their strip isn't actually made by Puma, it comes from a warehouse in Liverpool that has a licence to use the Puma logo. It's not a Puma strip. I'd love reasoned discussion, maturity Wid ye, DJ, aye? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Wid ye, DJ, aye? As i said in the post, i was a quiet news day. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 (edited) English lessons tonight is it ?. ?. ?. I really dont see the point off higlighing spelling erors & grammar mistakes when the reader already nows what message has been connveyed !. Pointless point scoring excercise IMO. says the guy whose only come back to one of my comments on the rangers v celtic forum was to point out 2 spelling mistakes??? 3 hours before you posted this . oh hb your hypocracy and patheticness make me laugh. Edited January 30, 2014 by forever_blue 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highlandmagyar Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 says the guy whose only come back to one of my comments on the rangers v celtic forum was to point out 2 spelling mistakes??? 3 hours before you posted this . oh hb your hypocracy and patheticness make me laugh. No 'a' in hypocrisy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 says the guy whose only come back to one of my comments on the rangers v celtic forum was to point out 2 spelling mistakes??? 3 hours before you posted this . oh hb your hypocracy and patheticness make me laugh. "hypocracy" "patheticness" These are obviously placed purposefully to divert attention from the rest of it... which has already been edited. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 "hypocracy" "patheticness" These are obviously placed purposefully to divert attention from the rest of it... which has already been edited. http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=patheticness+dictionary&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&ved=0CD4QFjAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fanswers.yahoo.com%2Fquestion%2Findex%3Fqid%3D20090917092141AAdJoVP&ei=SCjqUp3HLNKYhQer44AY&usg=AFQjCNHPPYYqy9E4wneUUtcPGvA5xFB-pw&sig2=-BFcLumButJdhUSek8Sj9g&bvm=bv.60444564,d.ZG4 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 "hypocracy" "patheticness" These are obviously placed purposefully to divert attention from the rest of it... which has already been edited. no my spelling is just shite mate. as i have admitted numerous times before. mock it all.you want i couldnt give a shit. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fotbawmad Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 (edited) We can afford the players wages, our players wages is like 30/35% of our turnover which is actually extremely good and most big teams would give anything for that. It's where the rest of that money is going which is the problem, not the wages. 1. You can't afford your off-field expenses; let alone your players. 2. During Minty years your wages to turnover ratio was roughly 40%. Yet you were still making £10m+ losses every year, and that was without people trying to siphon off money behind the scenes. 3. Fans and sponsorship don't bring in enough money to cover the fixed costs. So technically no amount of players wages is affordable. Edited January 30, 2014 by Fotbawmad 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Double Jack D Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 3. Fans and sponsorship don't bring in enough money to cover the fixed costs. So technically no amount of players wages is affordable. Even taking away the entire player wage budget (£7m), Rangers would still have lost £7m in the last years accounts. That is the very definition of unsustainable! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 The only way rangers can compete with Celtic is using handouts from a money man who will give them money that allows them to spend far above what should be possible. And there you are, back where you started under Murray, buying success. Is that right, DJ? We can only wonder how we secured so much success prior to Murray ever darkening our doorstep. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Is that right, DJ? We can only wonder how we secured so much success prior to Murray ever darkening our doorstep. Masonic handshakes. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Masonic handshakes. We were once able to count on favours from Dundee, Airdrie, Hearts and Killie as well. You know - like your dolly bending over for 'RA Sulk. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Good job you went bust in a hail of tears and snotters to stop all that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 We were once able to count on favours from Dundee, Airdrie, Hearts and Killie as well. You know - like your dolly bending over for 'RA Sulk. Is that right, bendarroch? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Classic Bennett at the peak of his joyously inadequate game. Rather than address a point, have a snide wee dig that's hopelessly wide of its mark. It was meant as a bantery joke, sorry. Has no concept of turnover. What a buffoon. You read that phrase in a paper and trot it out parrot fashion without understanding it. Expenditure of 30/35% of turnover in one company does not equate to the same level of 'viability' as 30/35% in another ... A company that turns over 40 million and has an annual 'profit margin' of 50% is different to company that has a turnover of 50 million and operates at a loss ... The phrase on it's own means absolutely f**k all without the complete financial picture .... Yet you bears lap it up like it means something .... unbelievable. No wonder you idiots get diddled. My ten year old has a better grasp of accountancy .... FFS. ETA: As another poster so eloquently summed this up .... :thumsup2 :thumsup2 Densboy CA ..... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Hyoooge fish, itsy bitsy barrel. What. A. Complete. Buffoon. Normans whoooshed once again lol -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Is that right, DJ? We can only wonder how we secured so much success prior to Murray ever darkening our doorstep. It's blatantly obvious. The game has changed greatly in the last 25-30 years. You can't use the pre Murray era of Scottish football as any sort of comparison. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 It's blatantly obvious. The game has changed greatly in the last 25-30 years. You can't use the pre Murray era of Scottish football as any sort of comparison. The leader has spoken lol It's the very model that you yourself suggested, even celtic are going slowly going down that road too ffs. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.