Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

To my eyes it's all set up with Whyte knowing all along that he would decide when to play the administration joker card to position himself as main creditor. I genuinely believe some sort of deal will grudgingly be accepted by HMRC. There will be pain for Rangers - but they will indeed dodge the big hammer blow. Short term pain, longer term, they'll weasel a way to rise phoenix-like from administration, as I say, like so many morally bankrupt cheating football clubs before them.

Thoughts? Hopefully not just of a 'LOL' nature! Really looking to see what you guys seriously see the end of this actually being when the dust settles.

A clear run then for Ashley to setup Rangers whatever way he wants. If he says he will bring in a new competent football manager and give him a war chest of £50mill or so over the next 5 years, the fans will back him and kiss his feet (and anything else he has available).

It is amazing what you can do when you have the cash. Something significantly missing from the other "heroes" from David Murray, White, Green, the bus boys, King, Murray II.

Ashley enjoys his poker. This game will be an easy one for him. He already holds all the aces. :)

Deja Vu? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As it appears to be bennett and The_Pedant's turn to rescue Tedi's hand-car from the quicksand* this time, maybe one of them could explain how McCoist has the same contract as he had in 2010, even though he is now employed by a different company?

You might want to throw in a curve ball as well and ask him why the same contract can be held by two different companies. The contract he had with "Rangers Football Club PLC est 1872" can't be the same contract he has with "Sevco Scotland est 2012" because they are two completely different entities and if Fat Salary has the same contract then surely it must be the PLC est 1872 that is paying the idiots wages.

Ffs Tedi even posted the contract was amended ? :lol: , if he had posted Sooper had a similar contract just like the club he supports is similar to the last Rangers FC he supported then no one could have contradicted him at all. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This happened to me several years ago and the takeover was seamless. Employees had the right to refuse to be Tuped but those who agreed to it carried on with the terms of the original contract.

Sensible post, Hec. You make a reasonable point. Have a Charles. Your case also makes a good justification for a few days "on the naughty step" and I'm delighted to see you posting again.

Edited by The_Kincardine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I might be wrong here but in England i think it's only an issue if Newcastle get relegated to the football league.

Yes, I think that's right. The Football League has restrictions on duel ownership along similar lines to those in Scotland, whereas the EPL is less regulated.

It's interesting this. The Scottish authorities clearly wish to be seen to be doing something, but it's hard to see what they can do, without precipitating things they won't want.

I'd imagine that some humiliating climbdown is likely, although it'll be unconvincingly billed as a negotiated settlement that's in everyone's interests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, lets not wait

Not getting 'Ballsy' :lol: would have been ignoring it all and hoping it goes away.

You truly have no patter of your own and keep stealing other posters patter eg "lol" :lol:

It would appear you are getting a bit ballsy yourself tonight chump. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed ... club/company? Whose tax? Your use of "there"'.

Seething mess of a post ...

You could only do worse by posting 'shyte' equivalent to Tedi's drug induced rambling about McCoist's contract.

Your new club gets funnier and funnier ... have they been nominated for the British Comedy Awards?

No they haven't.

HTH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You never had a point, you are generalising without actually being specific.

As I said, your lack of understanding does not negate the fact that a point was being made. I will make it easy for you -

Information released to the stock exchange via the RNS system does not mean that the statement can be mis-worded or wrong. So the point that you tried to make about it being subject to some additional scrutiny is not accurate.

RNS Number : 6537L
Rangers Int. Football Club PLC
07 July 2014

?

Rangers International Football Club plc

("Rangers" the "Club" or the "Company")

Statement re: Annual results for the 13 month period ended 30 June 2013

The Directors confirm that following the issue of shares announced on 1 July 2014 pursuant to the exercise of options by a former Director, there are now no outstanding share options or convertible shares held within the Group. The Directors note that Note 30 to the accounts for the 13 month period ended 30 June 2013 was incorrect to the extent that the options to which the share announcement on 1 July 2014 relate were not included.

For further information please contact:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I said, your lack of understanding does not negate the fact that a point was being made. I will make it easy for you -

Information released to the stock exchange via the RNS system does not mean that the statement can be mis-worded or wrong. So the point that you tried to make about it being subject to some additional scrutiny is not accurate.

Oh dear. I am guessing that you're bored of the independence shite so we have to thole your braying ignorance on The Big Thread?

Will you bring the same forensic ignorance to this thread as you did on The Thread of Fail or will you just continue to be a fanny regardless?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh dear. I am guessing that you're bored of the independence shite so we have to thole your braying ignorance on The Big Thread?

Will you bring the same forensic ignorance to this thread as you did on The Thread of Fail or will you just continue to be a fanny regardless?

Braying ignorance? Correct the part that I have wrong then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am pure beeling, Bud. I have to share bandwidth with some fucktard who thinks " "Don't post, china"" is wrong.

So how's yerself? Hard game at The Piggery especially after you drew level early on.

Only delayed the inevitable. The c***s seem to be developing a modicum of consistency, unfortunately.

If we're clutching at straws at least we got our first goal there in god knows how long. Fear we'll be swapping places with your mob come season end, tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only delayed the inevitable. The c***s seem to be developing a modicum of consistency, unfortunately.

If we're clutching at straws at least we got our first goal there in god knows how long. Fear we'll be swapping places with your mob come season end, tbh.

I liked Tommy Craig as a guy. Any feel for his replacement?

No need for the two sets of double inverted commas. HTH

Just f**k right off with your grammar bollocks. Some of us have more important things to discuss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...