THE KING Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 Tedi Accuse someone of making shit up. Get exposed for making shit up. You could not make Tedi up. Another day of Tedi faliure. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeeHectorPar Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 The company are keeping 7%? 1470 tickets? One for Fat Sally and the rest for his pies. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boghead ranter Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 Fruity King Stadium. http://www.winnersports.co.uk/gambling-company-sniffing-around-liverpool-fc-and-rangers-fc-stadium-naming-rights-96076 Reports from todays www.huffingtonpost.co.uk suggest an online gambling company named Fruity King who have recently been linked to several sponsorship deals are leaving no stone unturned in their efforts to break into British football and are now expressing an interest in stadium naming rights for Liverpool FC and Rangers FC. Talks are live with a number of bodies, including the SPFL. Talks are live with big clubs, were working tirelessly behind the scenes. It could be anything; we could even rename the Main stand at Anfield. It appears nothing is out of bounds with the company also bullishly proclaiming; We are interested in stadium naming rights, shirt sponsorship deals and football league rights packages. We might even buy a football club Early this week it was announced that Fruity King a mobile casino gaming site is in talks with the Scottish Professional Football League (SPFL) regarding a £1.75m sponsorship deal. They quoted us a figure for the rights of all four leagues, explained the companys commercial director, a statement that confirmed the companys intention to become an integral part of the Scottish footballing landscape. Discussions with the SPFL are said to be ongoing and are set to continue early in 2015 There is a real opportunity for those clubs who have not yet made the leap of faith to re-name their stadium, there is untapped revenue. Their commercial director said: I am not concerned about the fans reaction. This is purely from a commercial aspect Using Rangers Ibrox Stadium as the example he continues, they can still call it Ibrox if they prefer. This is nothing new in the sports franchise world. This has been going on for over a decade in the USA. He continued, Look at the deal between The New Orleans Pelicans and Smoothie King. It was renamed The Smoothie King Center (originally New Orleans Arena) in 2014. Written by: Staff Writer Comments 0 comments or the F.King stadium for short. "Where are you guys playing this week?" "That F.King stadium" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shizzlemanizzle Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 When did Rangers start having a 'The' in front of 'Rangers', do you know? They didn't. 'Rangers' died to death and along came the plastic imitation called 'The Rangers'. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BradHorse Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 They didn't. 'Rangers' died to death and along came the plastic imitation called 'The Rangers'. You sure about that? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 When did Rangers start having a 'The' in front of 'Rangers', do you know? Aw, you forgot ? THE NEWCUNTO F.C. -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 You've said 'fact' after it so I presume that's a true circumstance in your case. Sad to hear but just to let you know, not everyone who supports Rangers is a bigot. Some people are ashamed of the bigoted aspect of our fans. The " majority " sit on their hands and do nothing ( probably tap their feet though ) -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 You sure about that? We all are. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeeHectorPar Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 or the F.King stadium for short. "Where are you guys playing this week?" "That F.King stadium" Why try to sell a pig in a poke? "Playing at F.King Ibrox" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 Ya D'Arcy wee bugger.... Auto correct :-( See. You can't move on here without bumping into a post that's riddled with Austen's influence. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 Mike can prove they were previously employed by him. He can prove that employment ended. He can prove they were recommended by someone other than him. They will if necessary provide sworn statements. Does the fact that it was Llambias who went to Hampden before Christmas to ask the SFA to allow Ashley to buy more shares, not sort of suggest that the former still works for the latter? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 I imagine every support has their share of idiots and ours is no exception. I think that as with most things, the OF have traditionally taken huge chunks of everyone else's share. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 I've never doubted it.Your typical 'new club' debate on here, reads like a tiff between a couple of Bronte sisters. Anne didn't enjoy a good relationship with Charlotte or Emily, she felt much closer to their brother Branwell and encouraged him to write too, unfortunately he preferred to spend his time with a pint rather than a pen. Just thought you might be interested. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 I think that as with most things, the OF have traditionally taken huge chunks of everyone else's share. How did you slip through the net? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 We all are. You're all wrong then but that is nothing new. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 See. You can't move on here without bumping into a post that's riddled with Austen's influence. Oh behave.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weirdcal Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 Oh behave.... Its like that time they stole his mojo... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 (edited) Oh behave....Your first name's Elizabeth, isn't it?It is. Isn't it? Edited January 10, 2015 by Monkey Tennis 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 Anne didn't enjoy a good relationship with Charlotte or Emily, she felt much closer to their brother Branwell and encouraged him to write too, unfortunately he preferred to spend his time with a pint rather than a pen. Just thought you might be interested. The fact that this thread has sent Rob scurrying to carry out research on the Brontes, must count as one of its finest achievements. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 (edited) Does Llambias not represent the company that requires the investment. Is it not the 'clumpany' that would be punished for any investment procured from him. MA does not fall under their jurisdiction and rules, he is simply an investor they approached. The club wanted to be allowed to accept MA's offer of investment. Why would Ashley go? I see your point, but is it not also simply a fact that a condition of a loan, was that Llambias join the board?I don't think that proving a current relationship and its related "influence", would be a problem. Edited January 10, 2015 by Monkey Tennis 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.