WhiteRoseKillie Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Aw bless, Tedi's wee mate has come back out of the cellar to take him seriously. That's nice. You'd have thought the fact that the announcement has been followed by an extreme paucity of berz might alert these two to things being a bit "pointy and laughy", but then again, maybe it's just the rest of the world being somehow unaware of the true depths of depravity plumbed by those toxic (yet strangely acceptable to the AIM) big boys who have now run away. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akredz Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Well if you listen to some the nonsense being spouted on here, all the damage has occurred the last few weeks and respected businessmen like Park and Gilligan have suddenly turned into stock market liars ^^^^ seems unable to grasp the significance in the change of "regime" and the subsequent loss of AIM status. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 You can't believe that but all the directors for the past 3 years have been doing it according to you Most of the directors over the last 3 years were labelled as "spivs" on here, now they are suddenly being portrayed as model businessmen. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akredz Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 According to Spiers the club was flourishing until a few weeks ago and it's all down to that nasty Paul Murray that the club is in a shite state. The club needs to name the nomad they had talks with and then the media can check if their story matches the boards story. Clear this mess up a bit. It would certainly be a good starting point. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Thompson Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 King is not even a director, he is a 14% shareholder that is it. This was a public announcement on the stock exchange and all the Directors are responsible for its content. Are you claiming that Douglas Park, John Bennett, John Gilligan, Paul Murray and James Blair are all complicit in some sort of ruse to lie to shareholders? When King took control you say? He is not on the board and has a shareholding of 14%, you ofcourse are correct and King has taken control. Ashley holds less than 10%. Do you believe he wasnt in control of the club when Llambias was CEO? The announcement was from the club to the stock exchange. A stock exchange they were in the process of leaving. You'd be even more gullible to believe that King wouldnt be prepared to lie in a club statement that to believe he isnt currently in control of the club 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accietilleyedye Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 When King took control you say? He is not on the board and has a shareholding of 14%, you ofcourse are correct and King has taken control. Paul Murray to be Rangers chairman until King ruled fit-and-proper unless your assertion is the King didn't make that decision 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accietilleyedye Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 According to Spiers the club was flourishing until a few weeks ago and it's all down to that nasty Paul Murray that the club is in a shite state. The club needs to name the nomad they had talks with and then the media can check if their story matches the boards story. Clear this mess up a bit. They can't and if you look deep into your soul, you know why they can't 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accietilleyedye Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Ok course, because DK has taken control and none of the other Directors really exist or have universally turned into liars, yep not believing this makes be stubborn. No it makes you look like an idiot and a fool , your stubbornness has nothing to do with the goings on at Rangers 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kildog Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 The disingenuous jokers are on fine form tonight. Keep it up lads. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Most of the directors over the last 3 years were labelled as "spivs" on here, now they are suddenly being portrayed as model businessmen. Nah. Just more legitimate than King. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accietilleyedye Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Whatabootery are you not the one that is always running about accusing everyone else of this? Do you believes these directors are all complicit in this lie?...it was a simple question. Simple question do you believe all the former directors were complicit in the lies told to you ? You could even answer if you think the directors under DM's stewardship were complicit in his dealings/lies 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Most of the directors over the last 3 years were labelled as "spivs" on here, now they are suddenly being portrayed as model businessmen. I don't think anyone has portrayed them as model businessmen. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Whatabootery are you not the one that is always running about accusing everyone else of this? Do you believes these directors are all complicit in this lie?...it was a simple question. Nice pint that.. Directors Bitter 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Ashley holds less than 10%. Do you believe he wasnt in control of the club when Llambias was CEO? Ashley tried to take control through a larger shareholding and was told to do one by the SFA. The fact is at present Dave King is not in control of the club. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accietilleyedye Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Most of the directors over the last 3 years were labelled as "spivs" on here, now they are suddenly being portrayed as model businessmen. Where and by whom, we would assume you can back this up with quotes reflecting it 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Thompson Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Whatabootery are you not the one that is always running about accusing everyone else of this? Do you believes these directors are all complicit in this lie?...it was a simple question. Hhmmm, no. Whataboutery is using another example to deflect from the issue under discussion. "Dont look at that, look at this", if you will. I used another example to back up my point. Of course theyre complicit but, possibly, only because they are directors of the company. Whether or not they knew anything about it before we did is another question entirely. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pozbaird Posted April 2, 2015 Author Share Posted April 2, 2015 Most of the directors over the last 3 years were labelled as "spivs" on here, now they are suddenly being portrayed as model businessmen. No, they're still very much spivs, just like Honest Dave King the convicted no-Nomad fraudulent glib and shameless lying tax fraudster. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Thompson Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Ashley tried to take control through a larger shareholding and was told to do one by the SFA. The fact is at present Dave King is not in control of the club. Good grief. Im going to stop now, as you and Tedi are clearly trolling Shame 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accietilleyedye Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Ashley tried to take control through a larger shareholding and was told to do one by the SFA. The fact is at present Dave King is not in control of the club. Who is then 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BinoBalls Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Ok course, because DK has taken control and none of the other Directors really exist or have universally turned into liars, yep not believing this makes be stubborn. There is a big difference between lying and spin. Perhaps the directors passed fit and proper, but the nomad said DK was a no-go. I certainly wouldn't take a statement from the Rangers board and not try and think what else might be going on. Have you not learned anything these last few years? Why did they only try and get one nomad? Why did DK say it would take 2 days when they couldn't get it in 30? What were they doing for the last 28 days? It's almost as if they wanted to delist. Now who said that?? Oh yes, DK. And yes, you are incredibly stubborn. If this was Celtic in this situation, you'd be very quick to point out the flaws and possible holes in the board statement. But because it's rangers and it's "the good guys", you will defend them like a member of your family, even when they're plainly giving a very unbalanced view of events. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.