D.A.F.C Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 Supposedly this is the same injury he was carrying since last season. Ankle problem and that the operation was delayed somehow? I do remember him hobbling about a bit at the end of last. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz FFC Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 58 minutes ago, smpar said: Not long after we signed Higgy, a few Thistle fans said his best position was sitting just in front of the midfield and in behind the striker(s). A possible front line could be Smith Higgy Cardle - Wedderburn - Shiels - Paton Higgy is very good at no10 role but he is frustratingly inconsistent. If Higgy was in the mood for us he was MOTM but that happens about 10 times a season. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy85 Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 Ten MOTM awards a season is a pretty damn good return tbh. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Toun Clock Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 Paton can play up front as well. Personally I'd give Smith a go this weekend to lead the line with McManus if Clark is out. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
da_no_1 Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 1 hour ago, DA Baracus said: It was so patently nonsense that he was on trial with us, yet the .net cretins were falling over themselves to believe it. Why would Morton let a guy who they consider to be one of their best and most influential players, a guy who was playing in their friendly games in his usual position, go on trial to a direct rival in the same league? Why would they actually be paying the wages of one of their best players in order for him to go on a trial with a direct rival? Why would the player himself agree to it? Even if somehow it was true, there would be no way we could afford the transfer fee anyway. But of course it wasn't true. Only a staggeringly stupid person would have believed it. Not defending .nut BUT............ Someone who looked very like him was either pictured or spotted in pre-season training with us. Someone posted this on .net & a few people replied, most of them saying it wasn't him or it was rubbish. I'd heard nothing about it since until you posted it here........ You seem extremely upset about the matter. I suggest a lie down. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DA Baracus Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 Just now, da_no_1 said: Not defending .nut BUT............ Someone who looked very like him was either pictured or spotted in pre-season training with us. Someone posted this on .net & a few people replied, most of them saying it wasn't him or it was rubbish. I'd heard nothing about it since until you posted it here........ You seem extremely upset about the matter. I suggest a lie down. A cretinous response with literally zero evidence. A typical trope trotted out by a tit. Any original thoughts on the matter or do you just plan on plagiarising other people's patter? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicken Wing Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 A cretinous response with literally zero evidence. A typical trope trotted out by a tit. Any original thoughts on the matter or do you just plan on plagiarising other people's patter? Glad to see the art of alliteration is alive and well! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A.F.C Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 A cretinous response with literally zero evidence. A typical trope trotted out by a tit. Any original thoughts on the matter or do you just plan on plagiarising other people's patter? That's pretty much all he does. Wait until a heated argument and join the side with the majority view and stand back and throw stones with zero actual contribution. I have never seen a thread started by him just attack after attack on here and on dot net. A classic forum bully boy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shandon Par Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 1 hour ago, Jimmy85 said: Ten MOTM awards a season is a pretty damn good return tbh. I remember Jackie Macnamara moaning that he had about 54 giant Mizuno kit bags cluttering his parents' house (for that was the man of the match award when he was a young starlet for us). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stellaboz Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 Who's the old boy who won the raffle thing, can he play up front? I'm worried the Shankland roulette is spinning back this way. We need a panic signing, someone foreign, exotic sounding and above all, a total donkey. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB1994 Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 3 minutes ago, Stellaboz said: Who's the old boy who won the raffle thing, can he play up front? I'm worried the Shankland roulette is spinning back this way. We need a panic signing, someone foreign, exotic sounding and above all, a total donkey. Want Felitciano Zschusschen? I'll give him a free lift as a sweetener. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shandon Par Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 17 minutes ago, Stellaboz said: Who's the old boy who won the raffle thing, can he play up front? I'm worried the Shankland roulette is spinning back this way. We need a panic signing, someone foreign, exotic sounding and above all, a total donkey. I liked the lad on trial last summer. His YouTube showreel was him blazing shots wildly off target in a variety of rough looking public parks in Eastern Europe. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
da_no_1 Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 A cretinous response with literally zero evidence. A typical trope trotted out by a tit. Any original thoughts on the matter or do you just plan on plagiarising other people's patter? Absolutely zero thoughts on this. It was blatantly obvious there was no truth in it. What does annoy me is the idea that .net is awash with c***s spouting wanky pish when in truth all forums have more than their fair share. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
da_no_1 Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 That's pretty much all he does. Wait until a heated argument and join the side with the majority view and stand back and throw stones with zero actual contribution. I have never seen a thread started by him just attack after attack on here and on dot net. A classic forum bully boy. Who asked you, you absolute drivelling mess of a human being. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DA Baracus Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 12 minutes ago, da_no_1 said: Absolutely zero thoughts on this. It was blatantly obvious there was no truth in it. What does annoy me is the idea that .net is awash with c***s spouting wanky pish when in truth all forums have more than their fair share. Of course they do, this one included, but like all one club forums .net has more than it's fair share. Fans of all clubs talk about their own version of .net in similar terms. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
da_no_1 Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 (edited) 6 minutes ago, DA Baracus said: Of course they do, this one included, but like all one club forums .net has more than it's fair share. Fans of all clubs talk about their own version of .net in similar terms. So we're kinda agreed then. Hurrah. Edited July 27, 2017 by da_no_1 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A.F.C Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 Who asked you, you absolute drivelling mess of a human being. Who asks you when you go steaming into threads all the time? Double standards? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
da_no_1 Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 1 minute ago, D.A.F.C said: Who asks you when you go steaming into threads all the time? Double standards? Can you explain what "steaming into threads" means? And the relevance of how many threads you start, compared to those that you contribute to, in the overall context of your merits as an internet football forum member. You. Absolute. Fucking. Drivelling. Mess. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A.F.C Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 Rumbled. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smpar Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 Jesus Christ, you two really are a couple of whinging little c***s, aren't you? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.