Jump to content

The Universe


Recommended Posts

Question: Everyone bangs on about how life needs water to exist. What's to stop liquid methanol or whatever being the equivalent to another form of life?

nothing its just that we have evidence of how life can evolve with water so its a good place to start when looking for life elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that always confuses me is that scientists claim that there is no "centre" of the universe.

Surely if all galaxies are moving away from each other then then there must be a vector between them. Trace each of these vectors back and they must converge somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that always confuses me is that scientists claim that there is no "centre" of the universe.

Surely if all galaxies are moving away from each other then then there must be a vector between them. Trace each of these vectors back and they must converge somewhere.

The main point here is that the big bang wasn't an expansion IN space. It was an expansion OF space. Nothing existed before it, so the big bang happened "everywhere".

To each individual observer, everything is moving away from them relative to where they are at any given moment in time.

So there's no "centre", as it were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a bit of trivia for people, the geographical area of Russia is actually larger than the surface of Pluto.

Whilst the land area that covers the Russian Federation is indeed fucking huge, that's a pretty cool stat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The main point here is that the big bang wasn't an expansion IN space. It was an expansion OF space. Nothing existed before it, so the big bang happened "everywhere".

To each individual observer, everything is moving away from them relative to where they are at any given moment in time.

So there's no "centre", as it were.

It still makes no sense though. To be travelling away from something then there must be a vector between you and the "something". Reverse that vector and everything is travelling towards everything else. If that's the case then everything MUST converge at some point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It still makes no sense though. To be travelling away from something then there must be a vector between you and the "something". Reverse that vector and everything is travelling towards everything else. If that's the case then everything MUST converge at some point.

Using what as a reference point? A lot of galaxies are moving away from us, some towards (we are going to crash into Andromeda in a few billion years) The mistake is in thinking of it as an empty 3 dimensional grid, the centre of which is the point of the big bang, and the universe subseuqently expanding and filling the grid. In fact the grid framework is the universe and the big bang was the entirety of that grid.

Edited by renton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...