Mr Bairn Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Paid 50p to tell yougov that I'd vote Labour in a Holyrood election, didn't vote in 2011 and plan to vote No. Pleasing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casual Bystander Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 (edited) Just got polled by yougov. Proof will be provided shortly. Are you being selective of your proof? You were adamant about a fact in another thread yet seem somewhat disinclined to provide the proof despite being asked. Yeah, because, you know... that's rock solid proof. Edited August 29, 2014 by Casual Bystander 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 I thought YouGov weren't polling folk on independence if they registered after November 2013? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confidemus Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Not only is this a whoosh but you missed the two previous people that I whoosed then explained the whoosh. You really are the simplest young man. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 I thought YouGov weren't polling folk on independence if they registered after November 2013? Wasn't that panelbase? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scothmist Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Not only is this a whoosh but you missed the two previous people that I whoosed then explained the whoosh. You really are the simplest young man. I'm afraid I don't have the time that you have to read through your previous shite. My nostrils can only take so much. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confidemus Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 I'm afraid I don't have the time that you have to read through your previous shite. My nostrils can only take so much. You're cruising for a wee hug x 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doulikefish Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 National Opinion Poll (Populus): CON - 35% (+3) LAB - 34% (-4) UKIP - 13% (-2) LDEM - 8% (=) GRN - 5% (+2) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scothmist Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 You're cruising for a wee hug x Just be careful. the last time you tried to take me on on intimate matters you outed yourself as a trysexual. noun: a person who is willing to and/or has tried anything sexual anyone can think of with any other person very young or old, animal or inanimate object male or female. Remember you are just stupid. Now run along. That should be enough for you to take the bait! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confidemus Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Just be careful. the last time you tried to take me on on intimate matters you outed yourself as a trysexual. noun: a person who is willing to and/or has tried anything sexual anyone can think of with any other person very young or old, animal or inanimate object male or female. Remember you are just stupid. Now run along. That should be enough for you to take the bait! If I was going to try it on with an inanimate object I'd be all over you like a tramp eating chips, ya wee smasher. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scothmist Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 If I was going to try it on with an inanimate object I'd be all over you like a tramp eating chips, ya wee smasher. You have done Confusedalot.com. You described yourself as a trysexual. Your words. You just cant help yourself. Can you? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 National Opinion Poll (Populus): CON - 35% (+3) LAB - 34% (-4) UKIP - 13% (-2) LDEM - 8% (=) GRN - 5% (+2) ^^^ -Hung parliament -Labour are the largest party, 10 short of a majority -Lib Dems keep only 11 seats -Labour have more seats than the Tories and Lib Dems combined -UKIP win no seats and the Greens lose their only seat Basically, you'd have no chance of a Conservative led coalition and Lab/Lib would only have an overall majority of 5. If this result actually occurred, and there was a Yes vote, then Labour would basically be governing for a year and then the Conservatives would become the largest party. Yes, if this result came about, the removal of the Scottish MPs would change the result in a fundamental way. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casual Bystander Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 I am still waiting for the evidence for the last "fact" you claimed. Seems like you enjoy being a bit of "knock door run", only with wild accusations and on the Internet. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AMMjag Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 National Opinion Poll (Populus): CON - 35% (+3) LAB - 34% (-4) UKIP - 13% (-2) LDEM - 8% (=) GRN - 5% (+2) The Lib Dems Out of interest, is there anyone here at all who thinks Yes will fail to score greater than or equal to 45% of the vote, even if they lose the referendum? Seems to be where the money is. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lex Posted August 29, 2014 Author Share Posted August 29, 2014 (edited) The Lib Dems Out of interest, is there anyone here at all who thinks Yes will fail to score greater than or equal to 45% of the vote, even if they lose the referendum? Seems to be where the money is. 45% is definitely the par score for yes if you will. It's certainly an achievable target, whereas winning isn't.In my opinion 45% or above would be a pretty decent result for YES and another referendum would be likely within 20 years, below would be pretty damning and that could be it for good. Edited August 29, 2014 by Lex 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Only a particularly stupid poster - one who couldn't understand how a 3/1 bet worked regardless of the number of competitors, say, a middle-aged man with spaghetti hoops stains littering his full replica St Mirren kit - would try and claim that, say, a 43% level of support from a 70-80% turnout for sovereign independence could ever constitute a 'pretty damning' result for a nationalist organisation. The issue is not going to go away: though it's of course quite likely that the SNP's opportunity to push a referendum onto the political agenda will be limited, by sheer swings of electoral support anyway. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casual Bystander Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 (edited) The Lib Dems This is the same Lib Dems Mr Bairn has claimed will get more seats than UKIP in the election and he claimed that as "fact". Funnily enough he has so far failed to back up this "fact", and the mischievous may suggest he is avoiding the request. Edited August 29, 2014 by Casual Bystander 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lex Posted August 29, 2014 Author Share Posted August 29, 2014 Only a particularly stupid poster - one who couldn't understand how a 3/1 bet worked regardless of the number of competitors, say, a middle-aged man with spaghetti hoops stains littering his full replica St Mirren kit - would try and claim that, say, a 43% level of support from a 70-80% turnout for sovereign independence could ever constitute a 'pretty damning' result for a nationalist organisation. The issue is not going to go away: though it's of course quite likely that the SNP's opportunity to push a referendum onto the political agenda will be limited, by sheer swings of electoral support anyway. Sorry, what? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 This is the same Lib Dems Mr Bairn has claimed will get more seats than UKIP in the election and he claimed that as "fact". Funnily enough he has so far failed to back up this "fact", and the mischievous may suggest he is avoiding the request. http://www.iaindale.com/posts/2014/02/05/why-the-libdem-seats-will-win-30-35-seats-in-2015 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.