Jump to content

Alistair Darling


DAFC

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Never mind Darling, what about Gordon Brown storming off in a huff on STV! Brilliant, just brilliant!!!

And of course the No campaign are not rattled, no, no, they are well ahead in the polls and can't lose :lol::lol::lol:

Yes it was pretty lightweight stuff from Brown. Cameron refuses to discuss his lovebombing. Ossie storms past Bernard Ponsonby without even looking at him. And now Gordo takes the huff because he was asked about "the perception of bullying". Now the media is beginning to ask questions of the NO campaign and they dont seem to like it much

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what about the people of an independent Scotland who don't vote for the government they end up with? Who will they moan about?

This is a common misunderstanding of what is meant by the democratic deficit, put simply it's not the fact that Scotland votes labour and get's Tory that consititutes the deficit, but rather that what Scotland votes for is irrelevent to the final result. When the UK gets a Labour government it's a consequence of England voting in the majority for Labour, the Scottish vote simply doesn't have enough wieght to make a difference in all but the closest cases. So Scotland only ever gets the government England votes for, regardless of party - and the only way to make politicians accountable is to make them dependent on your votes. The upshot of that is that politicians do not listen to the concerns of Scots, because they don't have to (altruism simply doesn't exist for these people), they are not dependent on Scottish goodwill to keep thier jobs by and large and thus we are ignored by one side and taken for granted by the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a common misunderstanding of what is meant by the democratic deficit, put simply it's not the fact that Scotland votes labour and get's Tory that consititutes the deficit, but rather that what Scotland votes for is irrelevent to the final result. When the UK gets a Labour government it's a consequence of England voting in the majority for Labour, the Scottish vote simply doesn't have enough wieght to make a difference in all but the closest cases. So Scotland only ever gets the government England votes for, regardless of party - and the only way to make politicians accountable is to make them dependent on your votes. The upshot of that is that politicians do not listen to the concerns of Scots, because they don't have to (altruism simply doesn't exist for these people), they are not dependent on Scottish goodwill to keep thier jobs by and large and thus we are ignored by one side and taken for granted by the other.

I think the democractoc deficit point is a good one, probably yes strongest campaign message, but it;s worth noting that Scottish votes did make a difference in 2010 - it denied the Cameron a majority.

Now most of us would probably say "What difference did that make" - I'll leave such defences of the Lib dems to Ad Lib.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the democractoc deficit point is a good one, probably yes strongest campaign message, but it;s worth noting that Scottish votes did make a difference in 2010 - it denied the Cameron a majority.

Now most of us would probably say "What difference did that make" - I'll leave such defences of the Lib dems to Ad Lib.

True enough, it did - subtracting the Scotish votes from the second Wilson government would've changed a 6 seat labour majority into a hung parliament as well. So, 2 out of 18 GEs since the war where Scottish votes have mattered. Hardly inspiring is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True enough, it did - subtracting the Scotish votes from the second Wilson government would've changed a 6 seat labour majority into a hung parliament as well. So, 2 out of 18 GEs since the war where Scottish votes have mattered. Hardly inspiring is it?

I don't wish to labour the point (arf arf) - simply point out that they have had an effect in the last election. I wonder what Scotland would look like if westminster had PR - i daresay the tories would have afew more seats.

And of course, the votes of Scottish MPs were rather important in bringing in Thatcher....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't wish to labour the point (arf arf) - simply point out that they have had an effect in the last election. I wonder what Scotland would look like if westminster had PR - i daresay the tories would have afew more seats.

And of course, the votes of Scottish MPs were rather important in bringing in Thatcher....

Which in fairness stemmed from the back of an utter Callaghan fuelled IMF bailout and 'winter of discontent' clusterfuck. You can't really blame the electorate for not having hindsight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which in fairness stemmed from the back of an utter Callaghan fuelled IMF bailout and 'winter of discontent' clusterfuck. You can't really blame the electorate for not having hindsight.

I;m just at it. it was SNP MPs who first tabled a motion of no confidence in Callaghan. which led to Thatcher's election.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I;m just at it. it was SNP MPs who first tabled a motion of no confidence in Callaghan. which led to Thatcher's election.

So we've to blame the SNP for doing the right thing, ffs, how desperate can we be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you think ushering in over a decade of Thatcher rule was the right thing then sure, the SNP are blameless.

:P

You're sounding as desperate as No with that shite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...