haggis pakora Posted October 18, 2014 Share Posted October 18, 2014 No, you're some other fuckwad. Clarkston 5 has all the hallmarks of Banterous. Turns out you're just a pale imitation. The chief seethnat is in full meltdown mode.lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confidemus Posted October 18, 2014 Share Posted October 18, 2014 The chief seethnat is in full meltdown mode.lol You would lend more gravitas to your mewlings if you didn't end everything you type with a "lol". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
haggis pakora Posted October 18, 2014 Share Posted October 18, 2014 You would lend more gravitas to your mewlings if you didn't end everything you type with a "lol". Sorry cheif seethmyster.lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confidemus Posted October 18, 2014 Share Posted October 18, 2014 Sorry cheif seethmyster.lol. Yeah, you're supposed to fix mistakes when you edit your posts, champ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
haggis pakora Posted October 18, 2014 Share Posted October 18, 2014 You would lend more gravitas to your mewlings if you didn't end everything you type with a "lol". Here's a thing confidemus,do you know what the kille score was today? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
haggis pakora Posted October 18, 2014 Share Posted October 18, 2014 Yeah, you're supposed to fix mistakes when you edit your posts, champ. Will make sure I do it the next time,seethmyster, sorry.lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted October 18, 2014 Share Posted October 18, 2014 ^^^^ Scothmist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confidemus Posted October 18, 2014 Share Posted October 18, 2014 Here's a thing confidemus,do you know what the kille score was today? Will make sure I do it the next time,seethmyster, sorry.lol. You're beelin. A quick trip over to the matchday thread would confirm I do. How did your team get on? Whoever they are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
haggis pakora Posted October 18, 2014 Share Posted October 18, 2014 You're beelin. A quick trip over to the matchday thread would confirm I do. How did your team get on? Whoever they are. Hertz,they done quite dandy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 The general public are, by and large, stupid. I spent much of the referendum campaign stating that Better Together were banking on people being more stupid than they actually are. Turns out I was wrong, A well placed suggestive headline or a flimsy half cocked scary rumour is far more effective than the truth, which far too few of us seek to find out for ourselves. Even if what you know you're saying is a blatant lie, it doesn't matter, because by the time it is retracted or challenged, it has sunk into the psyche and all too often the truth has to be discovered, whilst lies can just be thrown out there, like a fart in a lift. I can assure you that stupidity is not confined to the 55.3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banterman86 Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 Bull. Bird was visibly contemptuous of Salmon and gave Darling an easy ride. The Record didn't lean no, it was no. I didn;t see the Record editorial where it endorsed them - is it online? Jackie Bird Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 I didn;t see the Record editorial where it endorsed them - is it online? Jackie Bird So you need them to officially endorse the NO campaign before you think the record were biased ? I'm hoping they'll officially endorse the old firm so that my suspicions are confirmed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banterman86 Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 So you need them to officially endorse the NO campaign before you think the record were biased ? I'm hoping they'll officially endorse the old firm so that my suspicions are confirmed. Another poster said they supported a No Vote. I know the Herlad and the Scotsmand did,I read their editorials. I know the Sun was neutral and I know the Sunday herlad endorsed Yes - where is the Record editorial backing a No vote? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 Another poster said they supported a No Vote. I know the Herlad and the Scotsmand did,I read their editorials. I know the Sun was neutral and I know the Sunday herlad endorsed Yes - where is the Record editorial backing a No vote? They didn't but most people can read and come to their own conclusions. They were most certainly on the NO side. Not even close. Have they officially endorsed the old firm ? Did the Torygraph and the Guardian officially endorse no ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banterman86 Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 They didn't but most people can read and come to their own conclusions. They were most certainly on the NO side. Not even close. Have they officially endorsed the old firm ? Did the Torygraph and the Guardian officially endorse no ? Yes, the Telegraph and Guardian officially endorsed a no vote in their editorials in the day before the referendum. This is what newspapers do. The Daily Record and the Sun didn't. Indeed, the unionists stooges at the Daily Record were so anti Yes Scotland that...they let them edit the paper for a day... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 Yes, the Telegraph and Guardian officially endorsed a no vote in their editorials in the day before the referendum. This is what newspapers do. The Daily Record and the Sun didn't. Indeed, the unionists stooges at the Daily Record were so anti Yes Scotland that...they let them edit the paper for a day... Yeah I seen that. Darling then Salmond edited then the day after Salmonds edit it was back to business as usual kicking the shite out of YES. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banterman86 Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 Yeah I seen that. Darling then Salmond edited then the day after Salmonds edit it was back to business as usual kicking the shite out of YES. Are there any specific examples you have in mind? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 Are there any specific examples you have in mind?No. I certainly won't be clicking on their site to find them. Maybe you could give us a wee compilation from the neutral ( ) record ? I'd be very very confused if I suddenly found myself sticking up for the Daily Record and New Labour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banterman86 Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 No. I certainly won't be clicking on their site to find them. Maybe you could give us a wee compilation from the neutral ( ) record ? I'd be very very confused if I suddenly found myself sticking up for the Daily Record and New Labour. So you know the Record ran biased stories, but can't prove it? hmmm.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reynard Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 Yeah I seen that. Darling then Salmond edited then the day after Salmonds edit it was back to business as usual kicking the shite out of YES. You know all this without ever having read it? Incredible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.