Elixir Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 Monarchies in the 21st century. It's up there with religion in the lolathon stakes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 If they hold out enough they could effectively force a Labour/Tory coalition which would allow Salmond to be the official leader of her majesty's loyal opposition and make independence absolutely inevitable. that would be glorious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 Servile Moron? Aye if you say so, I'm not the one sat with Salmond's cock drooling in his mouth? When was the last time the Monarch truly 'ruled over us' ya throbber ? And you're the one going around this forum calling other people bitter? Coming out with shite like that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 And you're the one going around this forum calling other people bitter? Coming out with shite like that? I responded/objected to 'old Betty' being called a scrounging cow, and her supporters servile morons. Seems fair no? works both ways for me. SSI was calling for Salmond to be appointed King of an Independent Scotland last week iirc ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tubbs Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 The SG wanted to keep the Queen/monarchy as long as the people of Scotland wanted to; which in a way is democratic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaikuHibee Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 I responded/objected to 'old Betty' being called a scrounging cow, Its Broken Britain. Something for nothing culture. Not fair play... etc etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 That does seem fair to call her that and to refer to her supporters in that manner. Perhaps you'd prefer unthinking forelock-tuggers? Forelock tuggers ffs, the Royal Family doesn't hold that influence over any of us, the pretence of continued oppression in modern Britain is laughable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 Non story. Can you really imagine ANYONE saying "well I was going to vote YES then I heard the queen and changed my mind"? No? Neither can I. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 Non story. Can you really imagine ANYONE saying "well I was going to vote YES then I heard the queen and changed my mind"? No? Neither can I. No I can't, not at all !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YassinMoutaouakil Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 You can tell someone's rattled when they start hitting out with "Ya". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killie Zenit Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 ..the pretence of continued oppression in modern Britain is laughable. Indeed. Like the time you suggested Protestant civil liberties were under threat... At every turn and every corner ..without ever really explaining what in the name of f**k you were talking about. http://www.pieandbovril.com/forum/index.php/topic/216527-if-this-is-an-example-of-the-orange-orders-contribution-to-better/page-2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mizfit Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 Speaking of the queen betting sites have stopped taking bets on her abdicating during her Christmas speech Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.