Tamdunk Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 The should change it to a page 2 and 3 spread...... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grim O'Grady Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 I'm pretty certain that the photographers are almost never forced into it, no. Yes but what if they are on zero hours contracts? Grimbo 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 The Sun is not a "NEWS" paper. People who buy it to look at a pair of tits are sad sacks. Loads of much better porn on the internet. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suspect Device Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 I don't find them degrading or anything i just don't see the point in having topless models in page 3 anymore its pretty 90's If i want to see tits i just hop online or walk in on my gf when she's in the shower It's more 70's but I guess that most on here weren't around then. Can no-one confirm if the Record did have page 3 girls? As for the point, it's actually known as a nipple. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PWL Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 Didn't actually know you still got page 3. Last time I read the Sun I was 17 mind you. And I'm pretty sure, as was mentioned above, that you got page 3 girls in the Record/Mirror at one point too. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grim O'Grady Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 Somebody post John Copper Clark's you never see a nipple in the daily express, please. I don't know how to do it on my phone. Thanks Grimbo 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hillonearth Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 Didn't actually know you still got page 3. Last time I read the Sun I was 17 mind you. And I'm pretty sure, as was mentioned above, that you got page 3 girls in the Record/Mirror at one point too. The Record definitely did - they used a lot of Scottish models IIRC. A college pal of the girl I was going out with at the time featured a few times. When I met her it there was no point undressing her with my eyes. Mirror Group had already done it for me several months before. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DA Baracus Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 Isn't crying about the Sun having baps on page 3 akin to complaining that the Nazis were litterers? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ya Bezzer! Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 It's embarrassing that certain newspapers still have page 3 nudity. Even the alcohol industry stopped putting girls on the cans 25 years ago. That's how backwards it is, even the manufacturers of pishy lager thought a quarter of a century ago that they ought to get with the times. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Archer (Raconteur) Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 It's embarrassing that certain newspapers still have page 3 nudity. Even the alcohol industry stopped putting girls on the cans 25 years ago. That's how backwards it is, even the manufacturers of pishy lager thought a quarter of a century ago that they ought to get with the times. Still available. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eindhovendee Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 Shes just jealous. Shes just utterly honking, just the look of her gives ye the creeps. ^^^^^ Not Ricky Foster. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SodjesSixteenIncher Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 Glad to have this thread to read because Page 3 is one of those issues that I've genuinely never really formed an opinion on. When it's an informative, reasoned debate on feminism or decency you're after, people who's critique of Scotland's First Minister starts and ends with "lesbian", "pure honking" and "utter c**t" are exactly who you want to hear from. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob the tank Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 Still available. Axel Rose's mother-in law 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cardinal Richelieu Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 Never understood people lambasting Page 3 protesters as lesbians confuses me. Surely if they are female and gay, they'll be all over the jugs in Britain's most tawdry newspaper? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cardinal Richelieu Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 Axel Rose's mother-in law Close. Mike Nesmith's mother. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Pete Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 Never understood people lambasting Page 3 protesters as lesbians confuses me. Surely if they are female and gay, they'll be all over the jugs in Britain's most tawdry newspaper? She's in the closet and ashamed of her feelings towards her own gender. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bert Raccoon Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 Never understood people lambasting Page 3 protesters as lesbians confuses me. Surely if they are female and gay, they'll be all over the jugs in Britain's most tawdry newspaper? I think it's because most thickos equate femanism with lesbianism. Tbh, I stay well clear of both. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhoy who invented weetabix Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 I dont agree with the pictures of women on page 3 with their paps out We should be able to see their fannies as well 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dorlomin Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 You can bet most of those wanting page 3 banned would go apeshit if the censors cut all the sex scenes out of Game of Thrones. I really dont have a strong opinion on the matter, its a terrible newspaper but no one forced you to buy it and the nudity is not on the cover. I think the idealised image portrayed by the fashion industry and women's magazines is genuinely much more harmful to the body imagine of young people than page 3. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LinkinFighter Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 I don't understand how some people get so wound up by it all. It's a pair of tits ffs. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.