energyzone Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 What's so important about the number of titles? Nothing really. Except bragging rights I suppose. Outside of Rangers and Celtic fans, nobody else in the world cares. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 What's so important about the number of titles? Not much, really. It's a continuation of the vapid argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 Nothing really. Except bragging rights I suppose. Outside of Rangers and Celtic fans, nobody else in the world cares. I said that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 Nothing really. Except bragging rights I suppose. Outside of Rangers and Celtic fans, nobody else in the world cares. On there's a Killie fan who cares, cares quite a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zidane's child Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 Nothing really. Except bragging rights I suppose. Outside of Rangers and Celtic fans, nobody else in the world cares. The Rangers can put a half star on their shirts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farrah Swango Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 Not much, really. It's a continuation of the vapid argument.Fair enough, just curious. I thought you may just be happy enough to have a club to support but I've seen a couple of bears reference the '54 titles' and I just wondered why it was so important. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P45 Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 Rangers' titles are intrinsically linked to the fans' self worth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 What's so important about the number of titles? It is amazing, isn't it? These people are actually grown ups and yet the idea that they've voluntarily chosen to attach themselves to something that was successful in a particular context years before they existed, appears to matter to them. Bewildering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambos Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 Flying Spaghetti Monster FC are on 54 titles too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insaintee Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 What's so important about the number of titles? Compensates for not winning the big one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 Nothing really. Except bragging rights I suppose. Outside of Rangers and Celtic fans, nobody else in the world cares. That's it totally. And that is why Tedi et al so vehemently defend their titles, even to the point of going all hulk mash when you prove that their historical timeline is broken and they are currently on their second SFA membership. Insecurity means that they must have peer recognition and knowing that their peers, ie supporters of all other clubs, do not recognise pre liquidation honours as theirs removes all bragging rights. It is hilarious to watch them getting so animated when nobody bows down to their bragging. Like watching toddlers stamp their feet for not being called clever after mummy helped them paint a picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insaintee Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 They got to see it as it made its way from the airport to Parkheed. Not to worry 5 or 4 and counting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1320Lichtie Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 RANGERS are still sweating on receiving their SFA membership after crucial talks with the governing body ended in stalemate. http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/333591/Gers-still-in-limbo-over-SFA-licence From that article 'It is understood the SFA want newco Rangers to accept sanctions which applied to the old company if their membership is to be transferred.' Wonder how many letter bombs the paper got before they stopped calling them the Newco. Personally I think that's what their name should be on GSS vidiprinter. Motherwell 3 (6 - yes, SIX) - 0 (1) Newco Rangers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 From that article 'It is understood the SFA want newco Rangers to accept sanctions which applied to the old company if their membership is to be transferred.' Wonder how many letter bombs the paper got before they stopped calling them the Newco. Personally I think that's what their name should be on GSS vidiprinter. Motherwell 3 (6 - yes, SIX) - 0 (1) Newco Rangers And that explains the football debt argument. It was a condition of the club receiving a membership. Providing more evidence of the broken historical timeline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 Still no official proof yet? Keep on digging lads.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 Biggest laugh in court. 'Rangers' lawyer " Rangers are 1 of biggest brands in world, Lord Tyre " it didn't stop them being liquidated" that will do me. You may continue to support a 'team' called Rangers. But it is not the same 'club' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 54 and counting 51 and counting Us and linfield welcome the chase Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 Biggest laugh in court. 'Rangers' lawyer " Rangers are 1 of biggest brands in world, Lord Tyre " it didn't stop them being liquidated" that will do me. You may continue to support a 'team' called Rangers. But it is not the same 'club' That is the legal (real life) side of the argument. In the legal world Rangers are in liquidation. In the football world things work differently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 54 and counting 51 and counting Us and linfield welcome the chase Rangers European Cup wins-023 European clubs including Celtic , don't expect a chase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 F_B looking more and more moronic with each passing day. Still if my club died, and the ersatz replacement club lurched from one laughable crisis to the next, to all round hilarity, I would possibly be reduced to being a repetitive demented drooling sobbing husk* as well. But what's the chances of that,eh? Doc McStuffins says ' diagnosis - Rangersitis' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.