Jump to content

Yet another US shooting


Recommended Posts

They're really building the full NFL experience into the game, it seems.
At this rate Madden 20 will likely have a feature where somebody will come round to your house with a pitbull and offer your dug a square go.
Where can I buy?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 29/08/2018 at 12:16, renton said:

The hardiest , semi-automatic toting survivalist camped out in the Mid-West would have a life expectancy measured in the minutes in the face of a combined arms US army battle group, after all. 

The Vietnamese and Iraqis did ok. Afghans are in their 17th year against the mighty US Army.

Individually the gun nuts are outmanned but collectively they have to be respected. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Detournement said:

The Vietnamese and Iraqis did ok. Afghans are in their 17th year against the mighty US Army.

Individually the gun nuts are outmanned but collectively they have to be respected. 

It's all about the rules of engagement, and the political dimension. If the US, or any western military for that matter, were allowed to engage in an all out total war with no regards to civilian casualties, none of those groups you mentioned would have survived very long. Indeed, in Syria where Assad doesn't give a shit about the court of public opinion, the same asymmetric tactics that have held up the US military for years were undone pretty quickly, and the various rebel groups stomped on pretty badly. 

In the hypothetical scenario of the state coming after the gun nuts, you can't imagine it being under the auspice of particularly Liberal democracy, ergo, I feel that they'd get rolled right over the top of in short order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Detournement said:

The US didn't follow any rules in Vietnam beyond not using Atomic weapons. 

The institutional racism that underwrites their aggresion abroad wouldn't apply in the USA. Working class Americans wouldn't attack each other.

In that case you have to factor in the US capacity to endure casualties, which has varied from conflict to conflict and ended up being the chief arbiter of US efforts in South East Asia. Also, a number of service chiefs at the time felt they were hamstrung in their efforts to control the Vietnamese situation - mostly in terms of limiting air support over North Vietnam early in the war.

In any case, the constant friction of combat has fairly advances the US ability fight asymmetric opponents.  The central point, that the US military possesses a de facto monopoly on coercion via violence, as banana called it, stands.

Edited by renton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Miguel Sanchez said:

You both appear to be missing the fact that an afternoon's droning would obliterate any sort of militia uprising with considerable ease.

And probably the succeeding generation, too, particularly if there are any school buses driving about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Do you think this will help or hinder the NRA's stance?

 

One one hand this 'proves' their theory that only people with mental health issues pose a threat and this one fell through the net when it comes to checks. On the other, it will further prove how fucking stupid America's current laws are regarding gun control (or lack thereof).

 

In this instance the NRA have no answer. An obvious case of current on-going mental health issues but he STILL managed to get a gun. They'll probably put another couple of check boxes on a form and that will be that.

 

 

ETA: First reply. What's the point?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/29/2018 at 18:59, Henderson to deliver ..... said:

Still waiting on you getting back to me about these stats m9.

I've covered this in some of my previous P&B Newsletters, some repeat reading / viewing for your pleasure, m7...

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233717660_Thirty_Years_of_Denying_the_Evidence_on_Gender_Symmetry_in_Partner_Violence_Implications_for_Prevention_and_Treatment

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228350210_Gender_symmetry_in_partner_violence_The_evidence_the_denial_and_the_implications_for_primary_prevention_and_treatment

 

As a wee bonus, a study in the US found that a man who calls the police on a violent partner is far more likely to be arrested than the woman he's reporting, while the reverse does not hold. For that you need to read up on critiques of the Duluth Model of IPV. Happy digging!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...