Jump to content

The Terrible Journalism & Tom English Thread


Recommended Posts

Tom English has one of the cushtiest jobs in the country.

Spits out utter garbage, half arsed articles every week or so. Talks pish on the radio a couple times a week about his second favourite sport. Next to no oversight or accountability for being correct.

All while being paid what i imagine is a small fortune compared to other journalists.

You've got to admire it to an extent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jacky1990 said:

Tom English has one of the cushtiest jobs in the country.

Spits out utter garbage, half arsed articles every week or so. Talks pish on the radio a couple times a week about his second favourite sport. Next to no oversight or accountability for being correct.

All while being paid what i imagine is a small fortune compared to other journalists.

You've got to admire it to an extent.

Apart from that,  what's your opinion of him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Jacky1990 said:

Tom English has one of the cushtiest jobs in the country.

Spits out utter garbage, half arsed articles every week or so. Talks pish on the radio a couple times a week about his second favourite sport. Next to no oversight or accountability for being correct.

All while being paid what i imagine is a small fortune compared to other journalists.

You've got to admire it to an extent.

He had an absolutely horrendous day yesterday with his favourite sport.

Such a wee shame

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mark Connolly said:

He had an absolutely horrendous day yesterday with his favourite sport.

Such a wee shame

Jokingly said to a mate how funny it would be if it was a Bulls v Warriors final…..

 

Marvellous stuff yesterday. 😎

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BBC today on Scotland's match on Sunday:

Quote

That should be enough to see the national team move to the last 16 stage for the first time ever.

I know the trope that Scotland would make history on Sunday by qualifying from our group has to be written into every article, but surely not to the extent that the 1974 World Cup – where we qualified for the last 16 and remained unbeaten throughout – has to be removed from the records to make way for it? (Or if they're just talking about the Euros, surely they might mention that there wasn''t actually a last 16 stage in 1992 -  only 8 teams took part – and in 1996, the last 16 stage was the group stage?)

 

Edited by Mr Heliums
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Mr Heliums said:

BBC today on Scotland's match on Sunday:

I know the trope that Scotland would make history on Sunday by qualifying from our group has to be written into every article, but surely not to the extent that the 1974 World Cup – where we qualified for the last 16 and remained unbeaten throughout – has to be removed from the records to make way for it? (Or if they're just talking about the Euros, surely they might mention that there wasn''t actually a last 16 stage in 1992 -  only 8 teams took part – and in 1996, the last 16 stage was the group stage?)

 

We were in the last 16 in the 1954 and 1958 World Cups too.  And would have been in the last 14 if the SFA had accepted our place in 1950.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Parttimesupporter said:

We were in the last 16 in the 1954 and 1958 World Cups too.  And would have been in the last 14 if the SFA had accepted our place in 1950.

 

17 hours ago, Mr Heliums said:

BBC today on Scotland's match on Sunday:

I know the trope that Scotland would make history on Sunday by qualifying from our group has to be written into every article, but surely not to the extent that the 1974 World Cup – where we qualified for the last 16 and remained unbeaten throughout – has to be removed from the records to make way for it? (Or if they're just talking about the Euros, surely they might mention that there wasn''t actually a last 16 stage in 1992 -  only 8 teams took part – and in 1996, the last 16 stage was the group stage?)

 

 

8 hours ago, Parttimesupporter said:

We were in the last 16 in the 1954 and 1958 World Cups too.  And would have been in the last 14 if the SFA had accepted our place in 1950.

We didn't qualify from our group in any of those competitions, though.  That's the point, surely? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hk blues said:

We didn't qualify from our group in any of those competitions, though.  That's the point, surely? 

 
 
 
 

But that’s an artificial measure introduced to build a narrative for a success story. In any case, the article I referred to went further: it didn’t mention qualification, it talked about getting to the last 16 for the first time. It’s journalists either ignorant of the historical context or knowingly deceptive - how on earth could we have qualified for the last 16 in 1992? But the media never mention this and I confess it irritates me more than it should. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr Heliums said:

But that’s an artificial measure introduced to build a narrative for a success story. In any case, the article I referred to went further: it didn’t mention qualification, it talked about getting to the last 16 for the first time. It’s journalists either ignorant of the historical context or knowingly deceptive - how on earth could we have qualified for the last 16 in 1992? But the media never mention this and I confess it irritates me more than it should. 

I think you're perhaps being overly pedantic - we have never qualified out of the first round of a major competition and that's the point being made.  

I agree though that journalists should qualify their broadbrush comments but that wouldn't change the fact above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, hk blues said:

I think you're perhaps being overly pedantic - we have never qualified out of the first round of a major competition and that's the point being made.  

I agree though that journalists should qualify their broadbrush comments but that wouldn't change the fact above.

You say pedantic, I say it's journalists's job to maybe point out the relevant context at least occasionally

Or to put it another way, how many times over the last few weeks have journalists mentioned that we've reached the last 16 of the World Cup twice and the last eight of the Euros once?  Or that the only Euros where we we actually could have moved forward to the last 16 stage was in 2020? My guess is zero.

I think it matters and not mentioning it devalues the achievements of previous Scotland teams.

Edited by Mr Heliums
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr Heliums said:

You say pedantic, I say it's journalists's job to maybe point out the relevant context at least occasionally

Or to put it another way, how many times over the last few weeks have journalists mentioned that we've reached the last 16 of the World Cup twice and the last eight of the Euros once?  Or that the only Euros where we we actually could have moved forward to the last 16 stage was in 2020? My guess is zero.

I think it matters and not mentioning it devalues the achievements of previous Scotland teams.

I said you were pedantic but I also said I agree that journalists should do better.

I actually think that saying we qualified for the last 16 of the World Cup twice and the last 8 of the Euros once would be a wee bit disingenuous UNLESS it was qualified by stating the context.  And what would then be the point as it would mean no more than saying we'd qualified for those tournaments? 

As for your last point - the team always gets plenty of praise for qualifying for a tournament. Going out at the 1st stage of those tournaments doesn't really justify further praise in itself.  Sure, there are times when additional praise is justified and duly given i.e. 1974.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a big deal but I think Mr Heliums is still right to file "That should be enough to see the national team move to the last 16 stage for the first time ever." as terrible journalism.  A semi competent journalist would use the phrase "knock-out stages".

Anyhoo, let's hope this discussion can be consigned to the dustbin of history on Sunday evening 🤞

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 22/06/2024 at 07:59, Mr Heliums said:

But that’s an artificial measure introduced to build a narrative for a success story. In any case, the article I referred to went further: it didn’t mention qualification, it talked about getting to the last 16 for the first time. It’s journalists either ignorant of the historical context or knowingly deceptive - how on earth could we have qualified for the last 16 in 1992? But the media never mention this and I confess it irritates me more than it should. 

A bit like me and people talking about the bottom team in League Two "dropping out of the senior leagues".

Edited by Jacksgranda
grandma
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The BBC North Britain football gossip page is never especially edifying but this takes the cake - 

"Brondby have reportedly placed a price tag on forward Mathias Kvistgaarden amid interest from Celtic."

Aye, thanks for that.

Edited by Bad Wolf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 22/06/2024 at 10:37, Jacksgranda said:

A bit like me and people talking about the bottom team in League Two "dropping out of the senior leagues".

What would be the correct description for that?

Dropping out the professional leagues? Or just dropping out the SPFL?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RandomGuy. said:

What would be the correct description for that?

Dropping out the professional leagues? Or just dropping out the SPFL?

Dropping out of the national leagues.

Most of the leagues - especially the 2 main feeder leagues - are professional to a greater or lesser extent. Except the Buckie Thistle board, perhaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jacksgranda said:

Dropping out of the national leagues.

Most of the leagues - especially the 2 main feeder leagues - are professional to a greater or lesser extent. Except the Buckie Thistle board, perhaps.

I heard Caley Braves owner recently talking about them running a hybrid close to full time model next season. Couldn't believe what I was hearing. A club with no fans considering being anything like full-time. Makes you wonder what other horrors are going on at LL level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...