AUFC90 Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 Ever thought about a career in law kev?Court receptionist ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antlion Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 Court receptionist ? Well he's already court jester. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glenconner Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 Court receptionist ? Court Marshall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom McB Posted November 29, 2015 Share Posted November 29, 2015 The very essence of scrambling for relevance right there. Ah, struggling to be the poor man's Vikington. Can you tell me what McGarry's been found guilty of, toots? Due process dear boy,this one will run and run,watch this space Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom McB Posted November 29, 2015 Share Posted November 29, 2015 Interesting to read the allegation in yesterday's Times that Ms McGarry offered to repay money to WFI before they dobbed her in to the polis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
invergowrie arab Posted November 29, 2015 Share Posted November 29, 2015 If that's the case she is pretty fucked. Her twitter persona , and that's obviously a very poor way to judge someone but I will anyway,reminds me very much of somebody I knew who got involved in something similar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevthedee Posted November 29, 2015 Share Posted November 29, 2015 Interesting to read the allegation in yesterday's Times that Ms McGarry offered to repay money to WFI before they dobbed her in to the polis. If true it sounds all very fishy,like i said before no smoke without fire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loondave1 Posted November 29, 2015 Share Posted November 29, 2015 Everyone deserves a fair hearing before sentencing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted November 29, 2015 Share Posted November 29, 2015 Everyone deserves a fair hearing before sentencing. "verdict", no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loondave1 Posted November 29, 2015 Share Posted November 29, 2015 "verdict", no?I've come to a unanimous decision so its sentencing im afraid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTChris Posted November 29, 2015 Author Share Posted November 29, 2015 Everyone is innocent until proven guilty, even those who are clearly guilty like <insert person I disagree with>, the venal lying scumbag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScotSquid Posted November 29, 2015 Share Posted November 29, 2015 No real surprise to see the SNP having politicians involved in such affairs. Why did anyone believe they were any different from the other parties? That's pretty dumb stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTG_03 Posted November 29, 2015 Share Posted November 29, 2015 It was inevitable really with such large numbers. Media spotlight seems to be on them a lot more though. I fully expect the SNP to act appropriately though IF they are found to have committed any offence. Innocent until proven guilty, right folks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antlion Posted November 29, 2015 Share Posted November 29, 2015 No real surprise to see the SNP having politicians involved in such affairs. Why did anyone believe they were any different from the other parties? That's pretty dumb stuff. Who actually claimed the SNP were any different from the other parties? They're as apt to have MPs/MPSs who engage in questionable dealings as any other party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon EF Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 If true it sounds all very fishy,like i said before no smoke without fire. And like everyone who's ever encountered you has said before kev, you're a fucking idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 If true it sounds all very fishy,like i said before no smoke without fire. And like I said before, that's a tremendously thick line to take. I wonder how you feel about not guilty verdicts, given that since they got charged and tried, the "no smoke without fire" thing should really take hold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScotSquid Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Who actually claimed the SNP were any different from the other parties? They're as apt to have MPs/MPSs who engage in questionable dealings as any other party. Well the Fide guy did. He bizarrely stated he fully expected her to be found innocent. Unless he in general believes in politician's integrity despite the evidence to the contrary. I think all parties are likely to deal with this in exactly the same way also if she's found guilty. In fact they have very little choice . Just beggars belief someone could be as stupid as she seems to have been. Was always the worry that with so many new MPs there would be a few 'chimp with a yellow rosette' types. Hopefully weed them out in this Parliament. Got to question the selection process that could have allowed her through the net. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScotSquid Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 And like I said before, that's a tremendously thick line to take. I wonder how you feel about not guilty verdicts, given that since they got charged and tried, the "no smoke without fire" thing should really take hold. Yep, no smoke without fire is incredibly unfair on people falsely accused. That said there can still be a reasonable presumption of guilt based on the facts known at the time. Not 100% but certainly more likely than not. Until the trial did you believe Oscar Pistorious was completely innocent? Or did you think he was guilty based on the facts in the public domain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Well the Fide guy did. He bizarrely stated he fully expected her to be found innocent. Unless he in general believes in politician's integrity despite the evidence to the contrary. I think all parties are likely to deal with this in exactly the same way also if she's found guilty. In fact they have very little choice . Just beggars belief someone could be as stupid as she seems to have been. Was always the worry that with so many new MPs there would be a few 'chimp with a yellow rosette' types. Hopefully weed them out in this Parliament. Got to question the selection process that could have allowed her through the net. The Fide guy? Also, where have I stated I fully expect her to be found innocent? If you were blessed with the adequate brainpower, you'd see that I had said she is guilty of nothing AT PRESENT. If found guilty later on down the line, that's obviously a different story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScotSquid Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Let's wait to see what the outcome of the investigation is first, but I'd expect her to be squeaky. Can't you read your own contribution to the thread? You claimed you expect her to be 'squeaky'. Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.