SweeperDee Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 And the news outlets in the now government defeat appear to be only crediting oneI don’t think even the BBC or Sky were expecting this degree of slap-down from the SC. Their coverage has been shite all-round, and very disorganised. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweeperDee Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 I see BoJo is accusing the SC of trying to frustrate Brexit despite the Governments QC in court arguing that, erm, prorogation was nothing to do with Brexit.I said it earlier today, but Keen and Eadie must be red in the face with sheer embarrassment with this verdict. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dorlomin Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 How the entire world sees us right now: Fool Britannia. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 Just now, SweeperDee said: I said it earlier today, but Keen and Eadie must be red in the face with sheer embarrassment with this verdict. What's an early-90s era Clydebank striker got to do with all of this? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carpetmonster Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 6 minutes ago, Binos said: And the news outlets in the now government defeat appear to be only crediting one The court have said because the Gina Miller appeal has been upheld with no right of governmental appeal, the Cherry et al appeal doesnt need to be heard any more. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dorlomin Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 https://www.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/james-obrien/legal-expert-david-allen-greens-take-on-supreme-co/ Quote But the genius of Dominic Cummings and Nikki Da Costa and the Number 10 operation have converted something that was inherently non-justicable to an 11-0 victory at the Supreme Court, just by their own tomfoolery. Well worth a listen for those who are looking a bit of the legal implications. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 3 hours ago, Mark Connolly said: PMQs tomorrow should be good. There's not going to be one. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweeperDee Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 There's not going to be one.Opportunity for emergency debate proposals to be put forward; also for statements to be put forward as well. Still will be tasty viewing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 14 minutes ago, carpetmonster said: The court have said because the Gina Miller appeal has been upheld with no right of governmental appeal, the Cherry et al appeal doesnt need to be heard any more. I thought the Government's appeal against the Scottish case had been rejected and thus the verdict in Edinburgh was upheld. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweeperDee Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 I thought the Government's appeal against the Scottish case had been rejected and thus the verdict in Edinburgh was upheld.This is correct. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweeperDee Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 3 line whip for the Tories tomorrow. Wonder what for? [emoji6] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DigOutYourSoul Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 I know it’s a shame but I can’t stop watching Joris Bonson. It’s the tash, it’s brilliant. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pet Jeden Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 Boris keeps emphasising that the law as it stands means by default we leave 31st. Which is intriguing. Is he maybe going to refuse to extend on the basis that the S.50 notice legislation and the Benn Act legislation contradict each other and that he therefor is forced to chose which law to obey - and is choosing the prior law? Is this all about forcing the remainers to specifically revoke the prior legislation - and then he can fight the next election on the basis of Boris and the people v Parliament and the Courts? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 54 minutes ago, UsedToGoToCentralPark said: Nope, the ruling was around the length of time, if he goes to the queen and asks for a week he is within the 'law'. He's already had a week and done f**k all with it. He shouldn't be allowed any more. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beefybake Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 55 minutes ago, Florentine_Pogen said: Not even that brass-necked cúnt would attempt that.......immediate Contempt of Court I’d think. Nah, he’ll be busy throwing Cummings under the bus and trying to save his own sorry arse.... Don't think so. Johnson will keep on brazening it out, lying unreservedly, until he's forced out. ... blaming Parliament, other MP's, the law.... and he can proclaim himself as the Great Martyr, and ready to fight another day for whatever cause he can attach himself to, for the benefit of Boris. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweeperDee Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 Boris keeps emphasising that the law as it stands means by default we leave 31st. Which is intriguing. Is he maybe going to refuse to extend on the basis that the S.50 notice legislation and the Benn Act legislation contradict each other and that he therefor is forced to chose which law to obey - and is choosing the prior law? Is this all about forcing the remainers to specifically revoke the prior legislation - and then he can fight the next election on the basis of Boris and the people v Parliament and the Courts?This government is not capable of playing some type of 56d chess. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 1 hour ago, senorsoupe said: Is Boris now 6-0 down on decisions/votes? He's the Watford of Prime Ministers, rubbish, forgettable, and should be sacked soon I may have lost count but I make it 7. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 3 hours ago, Florentine_Pogen said: Who is this cünt Bridgen ? Get him to feck...... A Johnston supporting Conservative MP - completely misrepresenting the verdict and what the case was about. But apart from that... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UsedToGoToCentralPark Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 3 line whip for the Tories tomorrow. Wonder what for? [emoji6]So there can be a conference recess I expect. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweeperDee Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 So there can be a conference recess I expect.Yeah, I don’t think the Tories are going to get their conference. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.