McSpreader Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 14 hours ago, Wee Willie said: Well done - A post with nae personal abuse. But you didn't answer my post. Do you agree (or at least accept) what I posted? _______________________________ You: I would suggest that MP's from Scottish Westminster constituencies , just like the Holyrood Govt , are failing the Scottish electorate by not engaging fully in the British parliamentary system. Me: I pinched this from another thread but I cannae place it where I want. I think the SNP are doing no bad in a place we dinnae want tae be. Your post that you wanted an answer to was a lot of your usual irrelevant nonsense. The document ^^^ that you have reproduced indicates to me that the SNP are engaged in clogging the system of government with their pernicious presence and not attempting to achieve anything meaningful for Scotland but simply oppose the Govt at every opportunity. The SNP in Westminster have to accept that the Tory Govt in Westminster will crack on with their programme with or without the SNP and if the SNP do want Westminster to do more for Scotland ( that's a big IF btw) then they should engage, negotiate and stop the petty point scoring as illustrated by the document above. Unfortunately the SNP are just like all the other politicians that have gone before them......self absorbed, disingenuous, inflexible, dogmatic. I just want my representatives to fight to improve the daily lives and future prospects of their constituents. I see the SNP fighting for their own relevance and nothing else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highlandmagyar Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 Maybe he'd feel better if, like you, he shrugged his shoulders and got on with picking Nigel Farage's public hair off his upper lip. Oh my! You really are losing it. Take off your tin foil helmet mate, your health depends upon it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hehawhehaw Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 19 hours ago, Randy Giles said: Not really. My reasons for wanting independence are purely selfish. I don't see any way that Westminster can be a benefit to us given that the two biggest parties there have shown time and time again that Scotland doesn't matter, and the voters in England are happy to just swing to the right on most things. And it IS the English vote that matters more than any other. Whereas the moron I quoted just celebrates the no vote and has no answer to it. He probably knows it's true and just doesn't care. Unless he's one of the Tory voting idiots out there who DOES see past the union jack, and is just a c**t with no morals. So you are a selfish git.There are many who are selfish but don't admit to it. So well done for at least coming to a conclusion. Does your fervent nationalism trump his staunch unionism? You must have read how sturgeon does not care about anything other than separation from Westminster, a euphemism for England. Swing to the right is what the snp would do as free enterprise combined with small "c" conservatism is the surest way to prosperity. If you do not believe this you should give all your disposable income to the Government. Or perhaps you are a beneficiary of public largesse, so you need people to contribute through the tax system to keep you in the style you have become accustomed too. I am also one of the happy and utterly foolish people, the majority, who rejoice every day for being given the chance by, the snp, to reject their raison d'etre. Can't wait to hear their reason for not publishing their mass consultation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hehawhehaw Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 19 hours ago, Wee Willie said: Listen sunshine. I'm a Third Division Superstar and you're merely a Junior League Sub. You can play with the big boys when you're promoted. MAMMY MAMMY I pished my nappy laughing again I need my nappy changed...Aye mam Wee willie posted again. But seriously now. Just how big are you big boy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WILLIEA Posted December 10, 2016 Share Posted December 10, 2016 Nigel saying that quitting as UKIP leader means" he no longer has to mix with low grade and unintelligent people " We can see who he means. The poster above this is a prime example. The self serving c*nt has used these idiots to further his own career and at great expense to the country. How do the brexiteers feel to be called low grade and unintelligent by their messiah? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hehawhehaw Posted December 10, 2016 Share Posted December 10, 2016 13 minutes ago, WILLIEA said: Nigel saying that quitting as UKIP leader means" he no longer has to mix with low grade and unintelligent people " We can see who he means. The poster above this is a prime example. The self serving c*nt has used these idiots to further his own career and at great expense to the country. How do the brexiteers feel to be called low grade and unintelligent by their messiah? ffs 15 days. you certainly know how to bide yer time. an aw fur what... och aye the noo. wit an oxter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted December 10, 2016 Share Posted December 10, 2016 Nigel saying that quitting as UKIP leader means" he no longer has to mix with low grade and unintelligent people " We can see who he means. The poster above this is a prime example. The self serving c*nt has used these idiots to further his own career and at great expense to the country. How do the brexiteers feel to be called low grade and unintelligent by their messiah? UKIP - 4m votesLeave - 17m votesI'll leave it to you to work out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WILLIEA Posted December 10, 2016 Share Posted December 10, 2016 2 hours ago, strichener said: UKIP - 4m votes Leave - 17m votes I'll leave it to you to work out. The fact that you got a greenie from the barista is telling! No? 63 % of those eligible to vote didn't vote for brexit. Statistics Eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 8 hours ago, WILLIEA said: The fact that you got a greenie from the barista is telling! No? 63 % of those eligible to vote didn't vote for brexit. Statistics Eh? It's not telling at all. You seem to be implying that everyone that voted for Brexit gives a f**k about Farage or would vote for UKIP which is a really fucking stupid thing to suggest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WILLIEA Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 1 hour ago, Randy Giles said: It's not telling at all. You seem to be implying that everyone that voted for Brexit gives a f**k about Farage or would vote for UKIP which is a really fucking stupid thing to suggest. You still drunk from last night or have you started early this morning? How you could extrapolate that from my post I have no idea. Away and have a lie down then think about another name change. You've used up your embarrassment quota for that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 How do the brexiteers feel to be called low grade and unintelligent by their messiah? So you'll admit that the question above is meaningless then. Since you now seem to know that many folk don't see him as a messiah at all and likely will pay as much attention to this as they did to anything else he says. Which is not much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 The fact that you got a greenie from the barista is telling! No? 63 % of those eligible to vote didn't vote for brexit. Statistics Eh? "How many didnt vote for something' is the retort of an imbecile.But let's play your silly game - comparatively how many people didn't vote to leave against didn't vote to remain? Oops same result as the referendum. Majorities eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WILLIEA Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 27 minutes ago, strichener said: "How many didnt vote for something' is the retort of an imbecile. But let's play your silly game - comparatively how many people didn't vote to leave against didn't vote to remain? Oops same result as the referendum. Majorities eh? Oooft! Getting awful angry and personal here. Unlike you. Could it be that deep down you are beginning to realise that brexit as you envisaged is not going to happen and that at least a modicum of common sense will prevail? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lichtgilphead Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 "How many didnt vote for something' is the retort of an imbecile. But let's play your silly game - comparatively how many people didn't vote to leave against didn't vote to remain? Oops same result as the referendum. Majorities eh? Can you apply the same logic to the 1979 referendum? If not, please explain why it was legitimate to ignore the majority on that occasion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppino Impastato Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 Cause British nationalism good and labour are enemies of Scotland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 6 hours ago, lichtgilphead said: Can you apply the same logic to the 1979 referendum? If not, please explain why it was legitimate to ignore the majority on that occasion. Of course you can apply the same logic. The Labour amendment to the bill was anti-democratic and I have previous called it out as such On 21/11/2016 at 08:02, strichener said: Eh? The majority voted for it. A Labour amendment to the bill was the sole reason that the voting majority voice was ignored in 1979. On 21/11/2016 at 20:33, strichener said: What has this to do with your original post? Labour didn't lose the vote on Devolution, they caused the outcome. Without the 40% criteria, the 1979 referendum would have led to devolution. Labour didn't have an objective of devolution for Scotland until Blair thought that it would be a good idea. Even he has subsequently stated that he thinks it was a mistake that he did not do enough to keep independence off the agenda. So back to the EU Referendum and majorities... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop Briggs Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 Nigel Farage will host a daily chat show on LBC - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-38517624. No more trips to Brussels or Strasbourg? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hehawhehaw Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 Now that Nigel has a radio show it will be interesting to compare his listening figures with fatso's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DublinMagyar Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 No. It won't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hehawhehaw Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 11 minutes ago, DublinMagyar said: No. It won't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.