Jump to content

Oor Nicola Sturgeon thread.


Pearbuyerbell

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, StellarHibee said:

Politics is a numbers game. When a party has been in power for so long, they begin to rely more and more on metrics, not only to maintain power but to increase their popularity share. Nicola Sturgeon was trying to be too many things for too many people. She wanted to be on everybodies good side, which is simply impossible.

She did not. She had no interest in being on the good side of the many thousands of party members she alienated, shut down, marginalised and abused.

she had no interest in the wider yea movement.

No interest in due process.

no interested in women’s groups.

no interest in consultation other than rigged consultation. 

She is a rat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said:

I have spoken to others who said the control freakery started under his watch and was cemented under Sturgeon. 

I get why there may have needed to be discipline within a political party, especially one that became the governing party, but there's that and there's the control freakery we're now seeing.

It certainly did not start under his watch. It was the most united party you would ever see, without the machinations and control freakery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Thorongil said:

She did not. She had no interest in being on the good side of the many thousands of party members she alienated, shut down, marginalised and abused.

she had no interest in the wider yea movement.

No interest in due process.

no interested in women’s groups.

no interest in consultation other than rigged consultation. 

She is a rat.

None of that is true, but you crack on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Thorongil said:

It certainly did not start under his watch. It was the most united party you would ever see, without the machinations and control freakery.

Murrel was appointed in 1999 - I suspect there was always an element of control freakery going on - just not as noticeable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, StellarHibee said:

Protest Party > In Government > Establishment Party

That's the problem. A party will talk a good game to get into power, but once they're actually in power, their values begin to erode as it turns into a simple numbers game to try and maintain that power for as long as possible.

The establishment party will always attract chancers. Folk with no political integrity or honesty....just ambition.

Eventually they grift their way to positions of influence.....the Peter Principle then starts to play out.

The SNP in recent times has maybe just had a few too many running at their level of incompetence.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, git-intae-thum said:

The establishment party will always attract chancers.

This seems to have been the case with Labour in Scotland in the 90's / early 2000's, it's interesting to look at the SNP and wonder how many MSP's / MP's would have joined Labour in previous decades as being the party which offered a pathway to power

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, moses1924 said:

This seems to have been the case with Labour in Scotland in the 90's / early 2000's, it's interesting to look at the SNP and wonder how many MSP's / MP's would have joined Labour in previous decades as being the party which offered a pathway to power

I remember the current MP for Edinburgh East when he was Assistant General Secretary of Scottish Labour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said:

Murrel was appointed in 1999 - I suspect there was always an element of control freakery going on - just not as noticeable.

Salmond also told them both that they couldn't hold the positions of Party leader and CEO. Murrell would have to step down. That was just after the Independece Referendum in 2014. They clearly thought they were untouchable and treated the membership with utter contempt.

Sturgeon should be shunned for the utter mess she has left the SNP in. Support for Independence is at stake and the drip drip drip of bad news will eventually start to impact support as voters start to question if you would trust the party to run an independent country. Omnishambles doesn't even touch it.

There needs to be mass resignations from the NEC. The sooner that happens the party can heal and reset. A reset is inevitable now, even for Captain Continuity.

The longer the report takes into the governance of the SNP the more this will be drawn out. That report won't be pleasant reading either, the party is a dysfunctional mess and hasn't been following the constitution for at least the last five years. It's going to make for painful reading and the buck stops at Sturgeon's door.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Trogdor said:

Salmond also told them both that they couldn't hold the positions of Party leader and CEO. Murrell would have to step down. That was just after the Independece Referendum in 2014.

Really? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

image.png.285b7d7a6bd389eae7127643c5690cbe.png

40 minutes ago, Trogdor said:

Salmond also told them both that they couldn't hold the positions of Party leader and CEO. Murrell would have to step down. 

 

Is there evidence of this?

As far as I am aware Salmond's issues with Murrell and Sturgeon only got back to 2018.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said:

image.png.285b7d7a6bd389eae7127643c5690cbe.png

Is there evidence of this?

As far as I am aware Salmond's issues with Murrell and Sturgeon only got back to 2018.

It’s a known fact that Salmond gave Sturgeon this advice and that she then pretty much closed the door on him. As soon as she became first minister she then completely froze him out. The clique she built around herself and Murrell then hated Salmond and saw him as a threat.

The trouble started with him telling her Murrell should go and when Salmond started planning a comeback crack at Mark McDonald’s seat after she threw him under a combine harvester they began their plot against him. 

This is common knowledge.

it is astonishing watching people still refusing to face the truth regarding Nicola Sturgeon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I agree that having the party leader and party CEO being a married couple probably is a bad idea how would Salmond be in a position to tell anyone what they could do after he steps down as leader. He'd be in no position to make such demands unless he had already put it into the party rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Thorongil said:

It’s a known fact that Salmond gave Sturgeon this advice and that she then pretty much closed the door on him. As soon as she became first minister she then completely froze him out. The clique she built around herself and Murrell then hated Salmond and saw him as a threat.

The trouble started with him telling her Murrell should go and when Salmond started planning a comeback crack at Mark McDonald’s seat after she threw him under a combine harvester they began their plot against him. 

This is common knowledge.

it is astonishing watching people still refusing to face the truth regarding Nicola Sturgeon.

 

Common knowledge?

So presumably you can back this up with press reports/accounts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...