Billy Jean King Posted December 8, 2023 Share Posted December 8, 2023 Cant have us off the front page on SPGC so bumped for no other reason. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irvine_buddie Posted December 8, 2023 Share Posted December 8, 2023 I see tickets for Hearts away on the 23rd are sold out already. Anyone know if they are likely to release more or do we only get the bare minimum at tynecastle? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Jean King Posted December 8, 2023 Share Posted December 8, 2023 1 hour ago, irvine_buddie said: I see tickets for Hearts away on the 23rd are sold out already. Anyone know if they are likely to release more or do we only get the bare minimum at tynecastle? They give everyone the same allocation now inc the arse cheeks. It's 600 odds I think 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
medals Posted December 9, 2023 Share Posted December 9, 2023 (edited) Be interesting to see if SR persists with Conor at RWB (please NO) hope its Small Taylor back too. Tanser is apparently fit. Hope we don't treat this as a must not lose game as we need to get back to winning and scoring goals. C O Y S give us a lift please. Edited December 9, 2023 by medals 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Friskysteed Posted December 10, 2023 Share Posted December 10, 2023 That’s 3 games now where there’s not been a post match interview with the manager on the official website. Anybody know why? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RussellV1 Posted December 10, 2023 Share Posted December 10, 2023 50 minutes ago, Friskysteed said: That’s 3 games now where there’s not been a post match interview with the manager on the official website. Anybody know why? Don’t know why they’re not on the site but they’re all on the YouTube page 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torfason Posted December 10, 2023 Share Posted December 10, 2023 2 hours ago, Friskysteed said: That’s 3 games now where there’s not been a post match interview with the manager on the official website. Anybody know why? They're all on St Mirren TV. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buttocks Brown Posted December 10, 2023 Share Posted December 10, 2023 Loved that, after the 2nd goal, the first thing Gogic did was sprint like a madman to a ball-boy so that Jonah could do the baby celebration! The CBM injury looked ominous. Seemed to know immediately what it was and you could see how frustrated he was. The transfer window is not far away now. I think one thing we'll see is Fraser Taylor come back from Ballymena and be involved. By the end of the month, he'll have played 20-odd games this season, so should be good to go as a midfield option. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted December 10, 2023 Share Posted December 10, 2023 Surprised Tanser was playing after having to come off with a head knock during the week, tbh. Guess football will eventually take head injuries seriously, but ReSuLtS COmE FiRst!!! Etc. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molotov Posted December 10, 2023 Share Posted December 10, 2023 8 minutes ago, RandomGuy. said: Surprised Tanser was playing after having to come off with a head knock during the week, tbh. Guess football will eventually take head injuries seriously, but ReSuLtS COmE FiRst!!! Etc. St Mirren do follow protocol with head knocks. We have history of keeping players sidelined after sustaining such injuries. Mark O’Hara has historically had a number of head knocks and has been rested in the past a number of times. Had there been any indication that Scott was not fit he would not have started never mind finishing the game. Our back room physio team is brilliant and there is no way they would have risked Scott. I also believe our manager would not risk a players health for the sake of the club. We had options to replace Tanser. Seems like you might have experienced a head knock on our keyboard with the state of your last sentence. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted December 10, 2023 Share Posted December 10, 2023 7 minutes ago, Molotov said: St Mirren do follow protocol with head knocks. We have history of keeping players sidelined after sustaining such injuries. Mark O’Hara has historically had a number of head knocks and has been rested in the past a number of times. Had there been any indication that Scott was not fit he would not have started never mind finishing the game. Our back room physio team is brilliant and there is no way they would have risked Scott. I also believe our manager would not risk a players health for the sake of the club. We had options to replace Tanser. Seems like you might have experienced a head knock on our keyboard with the state of your last sentence. How lovely. Protocol in football is that any head injury forcing a sub means the player is unavailable for at least 6 days, as head injuries are known to cause side effects at any point during that period, even if not noticeable within the first 24hrs. You seem to have gotten defensive about St Mirren, when my point was more about football in general. They just ignore it completely and rush folk back as quick as possible because results are "more important". Ive no idea why we didnt sub Kucheriavyi off straight after the incident with Tanser as it was clear he was done. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SS77 Posted December 10, 2023 Share Posted December 10, 2023 55 minutes ago, RandomGuy. said: How lovely. Protocol in football is that any head injury forcing a sub means the player is unavailable for at least 6 days, as head injuries are known to cause side effects at any point during that period, even if not noticeable within the first 24hrs. You seem to have gotten defensive about St Mirren, when my point was more about football in general. They just ignore it completely and rush folk back as quick as possible because results are "more important". Ive no idea why we didnt sub Kucheriavyi off straight after the incident with Tanser as it was clear he was done. Levein should’ve taken Kucheriavyi off before he did but I thought referee should’ve forced the change in the first instance, he looked totally out the game when the physios were giving him treatment 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted December 10, 2023 Share Posted December 10, 2023 8 minutes ago, SS77 said: Levein should’ve taken Kucheriavyi off before he did but I thought referee should’ve forced the change in the first instance, he looked totally out the game when the physios were giving him treatment Its not the referees job to make that call. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molotov Posted December 10, 2023 Share Posted December 10, 2023 1 hour ago, RandomGuy. said: How lovely. Protocol in football is that any head injury forcing a sub means the player is unavailable for at least 6 days, as head injuries are known to cause side effects at any point during that period, even if not noticeable within the first 24hrs. You seem to have gotten defensive about St Mirren, when my point was more about football in general. They just ignore it completely and rush folk back as quick as possible because results are "more important". Ive no idea why we didnt sub Kucheriavyi off straight after the incident with Tanser as it was clear he was done. No I clearly said that in my experience St Mirren would not risk a player with a head knock. Tanser lasted 45 minutes midweek. Your player lasted 10minutes. There was clearly a greater problem with your player following that incident. I don’t know why you are whinging about this. Not all head impacts are the same between players. If St Mirren have not followed protocol midweek or yesterday then you crack on and complain to the relevant authorities. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted December 10, 2023 Share Posted December 10, 2023 5 minutes ago, Molotov said: No I clearly said that in my experience St Mirren would not risk a player with a head knock. Tanser lasted 45 minutes midweek. Your player lasted 10minutes. There was clearly a greater problem with your player following that incident. I don’t know why you are whinging about this. Not all head impacts are the same between players. If St Mirren have not followed protocol midweek or yesterday then you crack on and complain to the relevant authorities. Its not about whos head knock is worse, a head injury that forces a player to be subbed sees a recommendation of 6 days without a game and gradual easing back into training. That means St Mirren have broken recommended concussion protocol by playing Tanser, no matter how flawless and brilliant everything about them is. I wont "complain to authorities" because im not some strange little virgin, i just brought it up because clubs ignoring head injuries needs dealt with better than it does, but i guess when theyve got folk like yourself who'll just blindly back their decisions because you support them, then we'll never see change. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molotov Posted December 10, 2023 Share Posted December 10, 2023 1 minute ago, RandomGuy. said: Its not about whos head knock is worse, a head injury that forces a player to be subbed sees a recommendation of 6 days without a game and gradual easing back into training. That means St Mirren have broken recommended concussion protocol by playing Tanser, no matter how flawless and brilliant everything about them is. I wont "complain to authorities" because im not some strange little virgin, i just brought it up because clubs ignoring head injuries needs dealt with better than it does, but i guess when theyve got folk like yourself who'll just blindly back their decisions because you support them, then we'll never see change. I provided examples of St Mirren following protocol in the past to justify the decision to play Scott Tanser yesterday. Perhaps I was defensive because I found your original message “ReSuLtS COmE FiRst” rather offensive given the impact brain injuries can have on speech and written communication comprehension. I’m certainly not ignorant to brain injuries in sport or life. Let’s not go down that road. Thank you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted December 10, 2023 Share Posted December 10, 2023 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Molotov said: I provided examples of St Mirren following protocol in the past to justify the decision to play Scott Tanser yesterday. Yes you did, which are in no way relevant to the decision to play Tanser. Clubs will always prioritise winning games over it, and it feels like St Mirren done that with Tanser yesterday. If Kucheriavyi was a better player then we'd have played him yesterday. The league needs to step in more as i feel like it something that gets abused more often than people realise. Im fairly certain Murray Davidson was coping fairly serious head knocks most weeks with us and just going straight back into it. Edited December 10, 2023 by RandomGuy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coventry Saint Posted December 10, 2023 Share Posted December 10, 2023 I'm still dreading Tanser and his agent agitating for a move south of the border on bigger wages two summers ago. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djchapsticks Posted December 10, 2023 Author Share Posted December 10, 2023 2 hours ago, RandomGuy. said: Its not about whos head knock is worse, a head injury that forces a player to be subbed sees a recommendation of 6 days without a game and gradual easing back into training. That means St Mirren have broken recommended concussion protocol by playing Tanser, no matter how flawless and brilliant everything about them is. Have we? From what I can gather, Tanser was taken off on Wednesday night for purely precautionary measures rather than definitely being concussed. Better to err on side of caution etc and Robinson said as much post match on Wednesday. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted December 10, 2023 Share Posted December 10, 2023 1 minute ago, djchapsticks said: Have we? From what I can gather, Tanser was taken off on Wednesday night for purely precautionary measures rather than definitely being concussed. Better to err on side of caution etc and Robinson said as much post match on Wednesday. He was taken off because of the head knock. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.