Div Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 24 minutes ago, medals said: 40% plus will be taken by them and its the cup. Celtic will get 1600 tickets for the game, won't be any different to a league match. Assuming the game will be on Viaplay the actual TV coverage itself won't massively harm the gate, but I don't see us getting close to the 7K that were at the league game before the break. 6K is about as good as we can expect IMO, and as always that will depend on the clubs setting sensible ticket pricing, and the TV company not giving us a really shit kick off time. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djchapsticks Posted January 22 Author Share Posted January 22 46 minutes ago, medals said: 40% plus will be taken by them and its the cup. Thry are entitled to 40% of gate receipts. Not 40% of the allocation. Celtic can choose to receive no more than 20% of the allocation which is exactly the away stand and that's all they will get. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meadowroadsaint Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 Just now, djchapsticks said: Thry are entitled to 40% of gate receipts. Not 40% of the allocation. Celtic can choose to receive no more than 20% of the allocation which is exactly the away stand and that's all they will get. Can we find some pillars to put in the away end just to make the entitled c***s feel a bit more at home……. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smellthepaw Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 (edited) I'm personally not bothered about getting them this early in the competition. Nice yes, to get a wee away day down the coast or to an obscure ground we haven't been to before, though I'm a firn believer that a home game vs them this early in the competition, strengthens our position to go all the way IF we beat them. Other than that, worse case scenario is that it gives us more focus on a strong league finish if we go out. Edited January 22 by smellthepaw 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Div Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 1 minute ago, smellthepaw said: I'm personally not bothers about getting this early in the competition. Nice yes, to get a wee away day down the coast or to an obscure ground we haven't been to before, though I'm a firn believer that a home game vs them this early in the competition, strengthens our position to go all the way IF we beat them. Other than that, worse case scenario is that it gives us more focus on a strong league finish if we go out. That's a decent way to look at it. We are also looking at a guaranteed at least a £71K pay day from the tie (£47K if we go out at this stage plus £24K TV money) plus our share of the gate receipts. I'd imagine that should loosen the purse strings a little in this week before the window closes. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
medals Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 34 minutes ago, Div said: That's a decent way to look at it. We are also looking at a guaranteed at least a £71K pay day from the tie (£47K if we go out at this stage plus £24K TV money) plus our share of the gate receipts. I'd imagine that should loosen the purse strings a little in this week before the window closes. That is what I am trying to say above. 6 figures overall. My mistake about their allocation though I thought someone said that 40 % allocation in the cup. I still wouldn't be surprised if they buy plenty tickets in our stands too though. January window brought us CBM and R Taylor I believe. Hope this one adds guys who perform at least as well and ideally one who is on it right away. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arch Stanton Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 4 minutes ago, medals said: That is what I am trying to say above. 6 figures overall. My mistake about their allocation though I thought someone said that 40 % allocation in the cup. I still wouldn't be surprised if they buy plenty tickets in our stands too though. January window brought us CBM and R Taylor I believe. Hope this one adds guys who perform at least as well and ideally one who is on it right away. Same rules will apply as per league games against the b(h)igots... Season Ticket holders and fans registered on the club database who have attended at least 2 previous home games this season only. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATLIS Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 On 21/01/2024 at 17:42, btb said: Apparently Martindale has said the fee will be "nominal" - for a guy who's just turned 28, is out of contract at the end of the season and has yet to score a league goal this season I'd say even that's too much. 100k + add ons + 15% sell on is the apparent deal we've accepted 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djchapsticks Posted January 22 Author Share Posted January 22 15 minutes ago, ATLIS said: 100k + add ons + 15% sell on is the apparent deal we've accepted Definitely not be us then. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATLIS Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 5 minutes ago, djchapsticks said: Definitely not be us then. I think it's between Exeter and Motherwell, or so the article on the Record said. Seems like it's Exeter he's away to 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djchapsticks Posted January 22 Author Share Posted January 22 28 minutes ago, ATLIS said: I think it's between Exeter and Motherwell, or so the article on the Record said. Seems like it's Exeter he's away to Which makes the James Scott leaving Exeter story make sense. Motherwell, Dundee, Ross County and ourselves interested in him apparently. I'm not a huge fan of him but at only 23 with a £1.5m transfer behind him and being a former Robbo player, he probably fits the mould in terms of style and the age bracket we tend to look at. We also would struggle to get anyone of a higher profile on a permanent deal in January so I guess it would make some sense that we are after him. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AW saint Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 19 minutes ago, djchapsticks said: Which makes the James Scott leaving Exeter story make sense. Motherwell, Dundee, Ross County and ourselves interested in him apparently. I'm not a huge fan of him but at only 23 with a £1.5m transfer behind him and being a former Robbo player, he probably fits the mould in terms of style and the age bracket we tend to look at. We also would struggle to get anyone of a higher profile on a permanent deal in January so I guess it would make some sense that we are after him. Played 21 games scoring 2 goals. Would rather we were not in the mix to sign him. We have enough low scoring players 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Jean King Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 8 hours ago, AW saint said: Played 21 games scoring 2 goals. Would rather we were not in the mix to sign him. We have enough low scoring players Which "high scoring" players do you suggest we look to sign instead ? We need to be realistic and Scott still has plenty potential. Pretty much the type of player we should be looking at given out budget. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Jean King Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Possibly 2.00pm Sunday for the cup game ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
btb Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 (edited) 10 hours ago, ATLIS said: 100k + add ons + 15% sell on is the apparent deal we've accepted Not what I would call "nominal" but congrats, I'm sure it will help you in the Championship next season. Martindale deserves Manager of the Month for pulling off that deal! Edited January 23 by btb 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 (edited) 28 minutes ago, btb said: Martindale deserves Manager of the Month for pulling off that deal! He'd probably have gotten more if he hadnt spent the last 12 months telling Nouble hes not wanted and needs to move, refusing to sell him cheap, and simultaneously making no club bid high because hes telling them all that Livi are skint. Edited January 23 by RandomGuy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MenstrieSaint Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 11 hours ago, ATLIS said: 100k + add ons + 15% sell on is the apparent deal we've accepted Reckon it's a deal that has the potential to rise to £100k , plus a sell on clause and Livvy talking up the transfer value . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arch Stanton Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 21 hours ago, meadowroadsaint said: Can we find some pillars to put in the away end just to make the entitled c***s feel a bit more at home……. Could erect a safety net in front of the North Stand with 12" wide vertical supports. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ric Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Out of interest, why do people think Nahmani hasn't been played all that much? It's a year's loan with possible permanent deal at the end, going by the now deleted (web archived) official club announcement: https://web.archive.org/web/20230701114144/https://www.stmirren.com/all-news/5002-stav-nahmani-to-join-on-loan-subject-to-work-permit-and-clearance I'm not looking for any conspiracy theories or something to blame the club and/or player, just interested in why he's not been given the time. Skill issue? Personal issue? etc.. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
medals Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 18 minutes ago, Ric said: Out of interest, why do people think Nahmani hasn't been played all that much? It's a year's loan with possible permanent deal at the end, going by the now deleted (web archived) official club announcement: https://web.archive.org/web/20230701114144/https://www.stmirren.com/all-news/5002-stav-nahmani-to-join-on-loan-subject-to-work-permit-and-clearance I'm not looking for any conspiracy theories or something to blame the club and/or player, just interested in why he's not been given the time. Skill issue? Personal issue? etc.. So maybe the deal to sign him is cheaper if he doesn't reach a certain number of appearances? Maybe like Taylor and CBM the coaching staff want him to learn the SR way before they got a more regular run. In Stav's case, maybe he needs to bulk up a fair bit. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.