Bambino7 Posted June 11, 2017 Share Posted June 11, 2017 23 minutes ago, The Grass Is Greener. said: How much are Aberdeen getting for Hayes? £18.88 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Not sure how you getting laughed at a lot classes as touching a nerve tbh. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sauzee#4 Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Can't grumble Cumdog his move. He's done his job and banged them in on the regular for the last three seasons, so he leaves with nothing but my best wishes for the future. Genuinely gives me the fear when I think about where our goals will come from next season though. Brian fucking Graham 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TartanWarrior Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 10 hours ago, Cumdog35 said: 1.4m with 15% sell on Agent Scotland The guy is an unemployed divorced fantasist. He doesnt know what the weather is like outside let alone anything about transfer details. The fee has been quoted at 1.8m in more reliable places. Decent fee but hard man to replace. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boostin' Kev Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 He's a better player than this time last season and just signed a new contract so the cost will surely be closer to £2m up front. Not confident at all in Lennon signing an adequate replacement tbh but we'll find out soon enough. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mackiemyday Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Don’t really get the Hayes v Cummings debate, one is at the start of his career with the potential to go on and become much better the other is 30 and has possibly reached his peak in terms of performance levels. Either way shame for both teams to lose their best player. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shootingboots Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 38 minutes ago, Bobbyb1903 said: 1.8 mill or not its a kick in the baws..hard to replace someone like him for that kinda of money... It's cool you've got Simon Murray. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boostin' Kev Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 7 minutes ago, G_Man1985 said: 1.8 million would be great business. Not necessarily, this time last year Rotherham were offering £1.7m in installments. £1.8m up front should be the minimum expected value now imo. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bambino7 Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 5 minutes ago, Boostin' Kev said: Not necessarily, this time last year Rotherham were offering £1.7m in installments. £1.8m up front should be the minimum expected value now imo. The installments may benefit us more in the longer term though. I'm sure I read part of the Farmer taking over our debt deal we could owe the bank a % of upfront transfer fees. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ginger Prince Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Don’t really get the Hayes v Cummings debate, one is at the start of his career with the potential to go on and become much better the other is 30 and has possibly reached his peak in terms of performance levels. Either way shame for both teams to lose their best player. Cummings isn't our 'best' player. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boostin' Kev Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 3 minutes ago, G_Man1985 said: 1.8 million for a player, playing in Scotland is good money. These teams down south know fine well we can't turn down figures like that (on few occasions this happened). For that sort of money, plenty players lennon could bring in. Hibs turned down that offer last summer. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheese Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 It's easy to say we rejected a higher offer last year, but without knowing the exact structure of the 2 deals there's no real way of comparing them. Was the bid last year dependant on clauses like goals scored, promotion etc. ? Is the Forest bid cash up front ? Does JC now have a release clause in his new contract ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cumdog35 Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 You would have to imagine he signed the new deal so the club could get decent money for him and Hibs would accept a decent bid for him if it came in. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boostin' Kev Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 11 minutes ago, Henderson to deliver ..... said: It's easy to say we rejected a higher offer last year, but without knowing the exact structure of the 2 deals there's no real way of comparing them. Was the bid last year dependant on clauses like goals scored, promotion etc. ? Is the Forest bid cash up front ? Does JC now have a release clause in his new contract ? We're talking very generally here of course, none of us has any idea what the specifics of each situation are/were. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boostin' Kev Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 7 minutes ago, Cumdog35 said: You would have to imagine he signed the new deal so the club could get decent money for him and Hibs would accept a decent bid for him if it came in. That's surely the case. Full credit to Jason for signing that new contract. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darren Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 1 hour ago, Boostin' Kev said: Not necessarily, this time last year Rotherham were offering £1.7m in installments. £1.8m up front should be the minimum expected value now imo. £1m now being widely quoted as the figure. No doubt with instalments. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zing. Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 5 minutes ago, Darren said: £1m now being widely quoted as the figure. No doubt with instalments. I believe the actual wording put about is "an offer in excess of £1m". So basically no one has a clue. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Absolutely astounding so many Hibs fans seem to believe the £1.8m would be upfront, I'll happily take this back if someone genuine confirms it, but I struggle to imagine any transfer which is paid in one go these days 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HibsFan Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 3 minutes ago, RandomGuy. said: Absolutely astounding so many Hibs fans seem to believe the £1.8m would be upfront, I'll happily take this back if someone genuine confirms it, but I struggle to imagine any transfer which is paid in one go these days Okay, not all upfront, but more so than Peterborough's offer last year - which from memory might as well have had clauses in the offer like "Hibs will receive £20,000 once Jason Cummings has scored four goals in blue boots". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Grass Is Greener. Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 5 minutes ago, RandomGuy. said: Absolutely astounding so many Hibs fans seem to believe the £1.8m would be upfront, I'll happily take this back if someone genuine confirms it, but I struggle to imagine any transfer which is paid in one go these days Absolutely astounding. Fairly incredible. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.