fan of the juniors Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 Not commented on this thread as frankly it was going nowhere & starting to bore me but the news of the last day or so has gave it a shot in the arm .Has anyone seen who voted for what yet ? Makes very interesting reading so it does . Looking at it Talbot , Cumnock & Glens could join their own wee breakaway league & just play each other for all & eternal . I’m sure they would get the 2 Irvine sides wishing to join them as well . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inanimate Carbon Rod Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 Not commented on this thread as frankly it was going nowhere & starting to bore me but the news of the last day or so has gave it a shot in the arm .Has anyone seen who voted for what yet ? Makes very interesting reading so it does . Looking at it Talbot , Cumnock & Glens could join their own wee breakaway league & just play each other for all & eternal . I’m sure they would get the 2 Irvine sides wishing to join them as well . Those 5 teams voted against it yes. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fan of the juniors Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 Those 5 teams voted against it yes. They did 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fan of the juniors Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 Also the 4 clubs that never voted are Dunbar Jeanfield Lochore and SaltcoatsSurely for something as big as this these clubs should be brought to task over not voting ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Stuart. Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 Those 5 teams voted against it yes. There wasn’t a vote? It was a questionnaire. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fan of the juniors Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 There wasn’t a vote? It was a questionnaire. You were to pick a pyramid yes or pyramid no option then an option a or option b choice & lastly entry level . Questionnaire or voting sheet the clubs still had to pick options 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Stuart. Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 You were to pick a pyramid yes or pyramid no option then an option a or option b choice & lastly entry level . Questionnaire or voting sheet the clubs still had to pick options That was the clubs opinion at the time, I must’ve missed where the vote was.Meadow have already said they will consult their shareholders when they have more information after the EGM. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fan of the juniors Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 That was the clubs opinion at the time, I must’ve missed where the vote was.Meadow have already said they will consult their shareholders when they have more information after the EGM. It’s a strange one though . Know it’s not set in stone but if clubs are against it from the get go then a few fans ain’t gonna change their minds 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garret Deasy Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 (edited) So those running the Great Pyramid in the Sky have gone to the moneylenders. https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/SC005453/filing-history then click on charges for 21st March 2018 Why this, and why now? Just the pension black hole, or something else? Come on your accountants/bankers out them give us a view. And you stattos, forget your obscure and obtuse leagues and tell us what you see, instead of scrabbling to jump on a sinking ship. Could be the SFA are now in the same position as Ranger were when Lloyds Bank put their man Manus Fulleron in place? Perhaps the Bank of Scotland now has first option on every pound that hits the SFA bank account, before the SFA can get their hands on it. Maybe the Scottish Football Association Limited (The SFA) needs junior clubs on board more than we need them? Edited March 31, 2018 by Garret Deasy 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post .Stuart. Posted March 29, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted March 29, 2018 It’s a strange one though . Know it’s not set in stone but if clubs are against it from the get go then a few fans ain’t gonna change their minds Very true. For some reason, a lot of folk support the grade of fitba more than the clubs themselves. Then you get the usual stuff, you need floodlights, which you don’t. Crowds would be smaller as if junior fitba is massively supported, they wouldn’t (even in the league we’re in right now, I can’t think of a club that have brought more than 30 fans with them) Travel would increase. It wouldn’t unless you were promoted to the Lowland League which would look unlikely for 99% of junior clubs. You’d lose the Junior Cup. Not really, it could become an all-in non-league trophy and who knows, maybe even get a sponsor. Prices would increase? No they wouldn’t unless you worked your way up the leagues just like any other country in the world Then you get folk saying noone wants to play Arbroath, Elgin, Annan etc. Why not? These clubs have a bigger support than 99% of jnr clubs and that’s with fans having to pay £10+ to get in. 28 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fan of the juniors Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 Very true. For some reason, a lot of folk support the grade of fitba more than the clubs themselves.Then you get the usual stuff, you need floodlights, which you don’t.Crowds would be smaller as if junior fitba is massively supported, they wouldn’t (even in the league we’re in right now, I can’t think of a club that have brought more than 30 fans with them)Travel would increase. It wouldn’t unless you were promoted to the Lowland League which would look unlikely for 99% of junior clubs.You’d lose the Junior Cup. Not really, it could become an all-in non-league trophy and who knows, maybe even get a sponsor.Prices would increase? No they wouldn’t unless you worked your way up the leagues just like any other country in the worldThen you get folk saying noone wants to play Arbroath, Elgin, Amman etc. Why not? These clubs have a bigger support than 99% of jnr clubs and that’s with fans having to play £10+ to get in. Bang on . Nothing would change for the vast majority of the clubs . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garret Deasy Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 Just a thought on some clubs grasping the pyramid 'route to the top' with such enthusiasm. We have seen clubs either developing their own grounds or having facilities built which they they accept the responsibility to run usually on a not for profit basis, for the benefit of the local community. There are risks in both these approaches. After all the 3G you get given by the Council today needs regular maintaining (think the maintenance cost of a 3G surface is about £4/hour of use) and replacing in a relatively short time (5 to 8 years). If developing their own ground the club will be dependent on grants and probably soft loans. Both approaches come with conditions. Running a sports facility is not easy. Having it handed on a plate still has its challenges. You just need professional management, this is not a game. Some are currently struggling with this, and in some cases have tried to hand it back to Council or Leisure Trust which just won't happen. Those successful in obtaining direct funding have the temptation to splash the cash on players with the plan to recover that money from future success on the pitch and additional income from the hire of facilities. I see Auchinleck are happy to stay junior, a club who have built gradually and live within their means. And there are many others at all levels with similar approach to running a successful junior club. It is a shame the realistic ambitions of those clubs get drowned out by those who will only survive with the extra shekels from the SFA as they climb the slippery slope of the money tree on offer. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Hamish Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 Just a thought on some clubs grasping the pyramid 'route to the top' with such enthusiasm. We have seen clubs either developing their own grounds or having facilities built which they they accept the responsibility to run usually on a not for profit basis, for the benefit of the local community. There are risks in both these approaches. After all the 3G you get given by the Council today needs regular maintaining (think the maintenance cost of a 3G surface is about £4/hour of use) and replacing in a relatively short time (5 to 8 years). If developing their own ground the club will be dependent on grants and probably soft loans. Both approaches come with conditions. Running a sports facility is not easy. Having it handed on a plate still has its challenges. You just need professional management, this is not a game. Some are currently struggling with this, and in some cases have tried to hand it back to Council or Leisure Trust which just won't happen. Those successful in obtaining direct funding have the temptation to splash the cash on players with the plan to recover that money from future success on the pitch and additional income from the hire of facilities. I see Auchinleck are happy to stay junior, a club who have built gradually and live within their means. And there are many others at all levels with similar approach to running a successful junior club. It is a shame the realistic ambitions of those clubs get drowned out by those who will only survive with the extra shekels from the SFA as they climb the slippery slope of the money tree on offer. 3g lifespan is 10-12 years. Very few clubs will end up with a 3g/sports hub style set-up. Who wanted to hand back the facilities? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Che Dail Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 10 minutes ago, Garret Deasy said: I see Auchinleck are happy to stay junior, a club who have built gradually and live within their means. And there are many others at all levels with similar approach to running a successful junior club. It is a shame the realistic ambitions of those clubs get drowned out by those who will only survive with the extra shekels from the SFA as they climb the slippery slope of the money tree on offer. Happy to stay Junior, play in the Scottish Cup and apply for and accept funding from SFP to upgrade facilities. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drs Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 14 minutes ago, Garret Deasy said: It is a shame the realistic ambitions of those clubs get drowned out by those who will only survive with the extra shekels from the SFA as they climb the slippery slope of the money tree on offer. Being in the pyramid actively encourages realistic ambition - staying in a separate junior league only encourages stagnation. Its not about the money, its about ensuring that your club can move to an appropriate level based on performance levels on and off the park. Most current "Junior" clubs will stay at the level they are at now, the likes of Dunipace, Muirkirk, West Calder and Tayport can be part of the pyramid without having to worry about your money tree in exactly the same way that the likes of Stenhousemuir and Arbroath can be part of the SPFL pyramid despite knowing they are never going to make it to the top fight. You cut your cloth according to the level you are at. That should be the realistic ambition for all "Junior" clubs. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrman2011 Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 Just a thought on some clubs grasping the pyramid 'route to the top' with such enthusiasm. We have seen clubs either developing their own grounds or having facilities built which they they accept the responsibility to run usually on a not for profit basis, for the benefit of the local community. There are risks in both these approaches. After all the 3G you get given by the Council today needs regular maintaining (think the maintenance cost of a 3G surface is about £4/hour of use) and replacing in a relatively short time (5 to 8 years). If developing their own ground the club will be dependent on grants and probably soft loans. Both approaches come with conditions. Running a sports facility is not easy. Having it handed on a plate still has its challenges. You just need professional management, this is not a game. Some are currently struggling with this, and in some cases have tried to hand it back to Council or Leisure Trust which just won't happen. Those successful in obtaining direct funding have the temptation to splash the cash on players with the plan to recover that money from future success on the pitch and additional income from the hire of facilities. I see Auchinleck are happy to stay junior, a club who have built gradually and live within their means. And there are many others at all levels with similar approach to running a successful junior club. It is a shame the realistic ambitions of those clubs get drowned out by those who will only survive with the extra shekels from the SFA as they climb the slippery slope of the money tree on offer. They should not be able to play in the Scottish Cup 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cumbo Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 1 hour ago, fan of the juniors said: Also the 4 clubs that never voted are Dunbar Jeanfield Lochore and Saltcoats Surely for something as big as this these clubs should be brought to task over not voting ? Jeanfield did vote/return questionaire 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glenconner Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 You do know there's hundreds of Junior fans who go along to games on a weekly basis who are thinking, "What questionnaire was that" followed by "Wonder how my team voted". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lokforever Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/sport/juniors/16124649.Pyramid_scheme__SJFA_head_lifts_lid_on_move_to_alter_Juniors_forever/ 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmontheloknow Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 40 minutes ago, Cumbo said: Jeanfield did vote/return questionaire I heard a team from North Region refused to vote as they felt it did not apply to them. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.