paul-r-cfc Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 Wee lassie in the Liverpool end asking Kane for an autograph. Disgraceful parenting to allow that nonsense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
8MileBU Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 Fucking hell! [emoji1]Fud of a commentator on NBC saying it was never a penalty! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Distant Doonhamer Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 4 minutes ago, The Master said: Virgil gonna Virgil. 3 minutes ago, Randy Giles said: That challenge from VVD 2 minutes ago, Mr. Brightside said: £75 million for that diddy 1 minute ago, senorsoupe said: On second look, the pelanty call was the right one. What was VVD doing there? 1 minute ago, killie_lad said: Van dijk is an absolute diddy. 75 million lmfao That can`t be correct. Good old Jamie Redknapp told us earlier the VVD had been immense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim McLean's Ghost Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 Lol at Kane getting a 2nd chance to hit a penalty. He is average at best. Surely Spurs actually have a good penalty taker? Kane has a conversion rate of 20/26 or 77%. https://www.transfermarkt.com/harry-kane/elfmetertore/spieler/132098 There is some good penalty data at this link which shows penalty success rate is declining. https://www.smartbets.com/statistical-analysis/premier-league-penalty-success-rate-low/ Either goalkeepers are getting better or high profile players are demanding to take penalties to pad their goal stats despite not actually being that good at them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
senorsoupe Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 The one thing about watching Liverpool is that you know you are going to be entertained. The can attack and score with the best of them and defend like the worst of them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim McLean's Ghost Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, senorsoupe said: The one thing about watching Liverpool is that you know you are going to be entertained. The can attack and score with the best of them and defend like the worst of them If only they invested some money on a defender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Connolly Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 Just catching up on the last 10 minutes. Thunderb*****d from Wanyama Offside then a shite pelanty from Kane. Brilliant from Salah Ridiculous challenge from Van Dijk, balls of steel from Kane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mastermind Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 What an absolutely phenomenal game of football. Just brilliant entertainment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The OP Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 13 minutes ago, Distant Doonhamer said: That can`t be correct. Good old Jamie Redknapp told us earlier the VVD had been immense. He had, absolutely strolled it for around 92 minutes. Always was prone to monumental lapses in concentration though, always assumed when he was up here it was because he found it too easy but apparently not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Kebab Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 Good game, fair result, but that linesman must of had money on Kane getting 100 goals today!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Connolly Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 Second pelanty was offside too. Get #VAR in the Premier League now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim McLean's Ghost Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 I'm flabbergasted by Dermot Gallagher expaining how Kane wasn't offside because Lovren had a swipe at the ball. What if Lovren put his foot on the ball and then Kane tackled him? It is a ridiculous idea that Lovren swiping at the ball is a 2nd phase or whatever bullshit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lanky_ffc Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 Absolutely stunned that the pundits are defending an English player after a clear dive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Kebab Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 Both penalties the correct decision according to Dermot Gallacher!!! Still looks like Kane was offside before the ball hits Lovren!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Connolly Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 Just now, Jim McLean's Ghost said: I'm flabbergasted by Dermot Gallagher expaining how Kane wasn't offside because Lovren had a swipe at the ball. What if Lovren put his foot on the ball and then Kane tackled him? It is a ridiculous idea that Lovren swiping at the ball is a 2nd phase or whatever bullshit. This. He received a pass that was initially intended for him. I'm not sure how that makes him inactive/not interfering with play/whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Distant Doonhamer Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 9 minutes ago, The OP said: He had, absolutely strolled it for around 92 minutes. Always was prone to monumental lapses in concentration though, always assumed when he was up here it was because he found it too easy but apparently not. To be fair he had played well but as you suggest there`s always a big error just round the corner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albertlegend Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 I'd say first penalty is offside regardless of whether Lovren touched it but the explanation Gallagher is giving seems to be the conversation the linesman had with the ref. And Kane dived still wasn't a Penalty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Distant Doonhamer Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, Albertlegend said: I'd say first penalty is offside regardless of whether Lovren touched it but the explanation Gallagher is giving seems to be the conversation the linesman had with the ref. And Kane dived still wasn't a Penalty Certainly the case that the assistant felt the key point was whether Lovren touched the ball or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lanky_ffc Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 12 minutes ago, Jim McLean's Ghost said: I'm flabbergasted by Dermot Gallagher expaining how Kane wasn't offside because Lovren had a swipe at the ball. What if Lovren put his foot on the ball and then Kane tackled him? It is a ridiculous idea that Lovren swiping at the ball is a 2nd phase or whatever bullshit. I usually agree Gallagher, but that was absolute nonsense. Lovren goes for the ball as he knows Kane is in behind him. Not sure how you could argue Kane isn't active if he's influencing the decision of a defender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Grass Is Greener. Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 Lolverpool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.