pandarilla Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 'Not sure about that. Where are they getting their information from, and are they being told what to say?Ok then poor editorial decisions.The last two days it has definitely changed, and there's no way it's better.I understood sturgeon last week when she explained the two different figures and the reasons for them. Today's bbc Scotland page was not in any way clear, and you get the impression someone is shifting the goalposts, either by accident or design. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 2 minutes ago, Thereisalight.. said: BBC Scotland news say 1600 deaths “related to coronavirus”, why can’t they just say if covid killed them or not, instead of using numbers like that to scare folk The coranavirus or its symptoms can be present with other medical problems when somebody dies, without it definitely being the cause of death. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thereisalight.. Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 1 minute ago, welshbairn said: The coranavirus or its symptoms can be present with other medical problems when somebody dies, without it definitely being the cause of death. I know, I just think if someone dies and it isn’t purely due to Coronavirus then it shouldn’t be counted in the death figures -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 3 minutes ago, pandarilla said: Ok then poor editorial decisions. The last two days it has definitely changed, and there's no way it's better. I understood sturgeon last week when she explained the two different figures and the reasons for them. Today's bbc Scotland page was not in any way clear, and you get the impression someone is shifting the goalposts, either by accident or design. Accident or design. Yes, that really is the nub of the matter. I would be inclined to put my money on design. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanius Mullarkey Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 Just now, Thereisalight.. said: I know, I just think if someone dies and it isn’t purely due to Coronavirus then it shouldn’t be counted in the death figures What should it be counted under then? If it’s a contributor then why not count it under those stats! Spoiler it will be counted under other stats as well. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lofarl Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 All of us in 2021. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 (edited) 41 minutes ago, Thereisalight.. said: I know, I just think if someone dies and it isn’t purely due to Coronavirus then it shouldn’t be counted in the death figures If they do that they'd be rightfully accused of understating the total number. If they include them they get accused of exaggerating. People just have to take note of what number they're talking about. Edited April 22, 2020 by welshbairn 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thereisalight.. Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 (edited) 32 minutes ago, Melanius Mullarkey said: What should it be counted under then? If it’s a contributor then why not count it under those stats! Hide contents it will be counted under other stats as well. The death should be stated as what was the contributing factor. When my Dad died a few months back there was 3 or 4 things listed as being contributory, but I only really cared about what the main cause was. If coronavirus killed them it should be stated as that, if they had it when they died but they also had cancer or something then it shouldn’t be counted in with covid deaths imo Edited April 22, 2020 by Thereisalight.. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The OP Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 9 minutes ago, Thereisalight.. said: The death should be stated as what was the contributing factor. When my Dad died a few months back there was 3 or 4 things listed as being contributory, but I only really cared about what the main cause was. If coronavirus killed them it should be stated as that, if they had it when they died but they also had cancer or something then it shouldn’t be counted in with covid deaths imo I’m going out on a limb here, but I suspect you are not a scientist. 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayrmad Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 2 hours ago, dorlomin said: FWIW, there is no cover up. Deaths in hospital are registered quickly and the capacity is on hand to test for Covid. Deaths outside hospitals can take a week to file the paper work and there is no capacity, at the moment, to test all dead. So total deaths lags the Covid hospital deaths by about 2 weeks. This has been discussed before that several people have raised the probability of a rise in non Covid deaths out of hospital due to people failing to go to hospital. Many heart specialists around the world are saying they are seeing a lot less non Covid cases than usual (as an example). Anyone trying to insinuate conspiracies without good evidence and a clear understanding of how the ONS data works are best dismissed. There is a lot of speculation being passed off as fact. It's not as difficult as it's made out to be. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayrmad Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 1 hour ago, pandarilla said: I noticed similar on the bbc Scotland website - some unclear reporting. I was checking the daily totals page for a while as i liked the graphs, especially relating to hospital cases across the country. Last night it had disappeared, and the Scottish live page was replaced by the British page. Its back today, but completely different. Details and consistency matter at this time, and there's a lot of poor reporting. It's not poor reporting, it's deliberate confusion. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todd_is_God Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, parsforlife said: Should we expect non-essential workers to pay a higher proportion of tax in future? I've no problem with paying a little more in tax, providing big earners and companies are actively pursued to pay the tax they should as well. I imagine most people would feel the same. Edited April 22, 2020 by Todd_is_God 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todd_is_God Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 1 hour ago, Thereisalight.. said: I know, I just think if someone dies and it isn’t purely due to Coronavirus then it shouldn’t be counted in the death figures In Scotland you don't even need to be tested. If it is thought that its likely to be a cause you will be added to the statistics. Pretty much anyone who dies in a care home, for example, where there has been a positive case of covid-19 will more than likely be included in the death total -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tutankhamen Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 10 minutes ago, Todd_is_God said: In Scotland you don't even need to be tested. If it is thought that its likely to be a cause you will be added to the statistics. Pretty much anyone who dies in a care home, for example, where there has been a positive case of covid-19 will more than likely be included in the death total Care home is the new Poor House 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parsforlife Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 17 minutes ago, Todd_is_God said: I've no problem with paying a little more in tax, providing big earners and companies are actively pursued to pay the tax they should as well. I imagine most people would feel the same. I agree but that would have been my attitude before. Its more of a question now if there should be a clear distinction between essential and non-essential roles. Rather than a the normal political debate over how high taxes should be and who should be paying. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The OP Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 (edited) 27 minutes ago, Todd_is_God said: In Scotland you don't even need to be tested. If it is thought that its likely to be a cause you will be added to the statistics. Pretty much anyone who dies in a care home, for example, where there has been a positive case of covid-19 will more than likely be included in the death total I don’t think that’s true. There was lots of noise even last Tuesday about care home residents not being tested in the UK and not being included in the death figures. They seemed to start testing them last week because we were told my grandfather had it on Wednesday, were told he was expected to die imminently on Thursday and he was dead by Friday. My understanding is that if he died on the Monday they wouldn’t have added him to the stats. ETA - is your position now that, not only is the FT article about under counting wrong, but the excess deaths are entirely down to people not attending the hospital with other ailments and the actual corona deaths are fewer than reported, despite the dramatic spike in mortality compared to this time last year? Edited April 22, 2020 by The OP 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigkillie Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 7 minutes ago, parsforlife said: I agree but that would have been my attitude before. Its more of a question now if there should be a clear distinction between essential and non-essential roles. Rather than a the normal political debate over how high taxes should be and who should be paying. It doesn't make any sense to permanently define jobs as "essential" and "non-essential" - these distinctions are specific to the current situation. It exists in order to (theoretically) ensure that the only people working right now are the people whose job is necessary to deal with coronavirus (either through providing medical or other care, providing food etc). However, there are plenty of people who are classed as "non-essential" right now whose jobs are in fact necessary in an ordinary society. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The OP Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 Over the same period, the number of deaths in Scottish hospitals from all causes has risen by 29%, but has rocketed by 146% in care homes. The accumulated total for care home deaths doubled last week, from 240 on April 12 to 537 on April 19. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/18396761.coronavirus-scotland-third-deaths-now-care-homes/ @Todd_is_God thoughts? Stupid old duffers too feart to go to hospital? Deliberate over exaggeration of the overall numbers dead to make coronavirus seem worse for reasons yet to be revealed? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
8MileBU Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 (edited) This has maybe already been asked and answered, but stuff trawling through this monster thread to check. Does anyone else find themselves getting annoyed with the daily reporting of cases/deaths being just the figures and wish they’d add some simplicity? I ask because over the last couple of weeks, my daughter’s got into the habit of asking ‘Is that more or less than yesterday?’ when the daily government briefing comes on tv. I now find them giving the figures fucking annoying because I now wish they’d give the figures but add ‘That’s a rise/fall in cases and deaths’ from yesterday. Edited April 23, 2020 by 8MileBU 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludo*1 Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 My missus and mother both work in different care homes and it's been really quite frightening the way the residents have been treated. One old guy suffers from a lung condition and as a result has lost one lung and struggles to breath at times with fits of coughing. He needed to go to hospital as there was an emergency with him (Completely unrelated to this). Initially the hospital were refusing to take him and then when they did they put him into the Covid ward due to his cough. He's since back in the care home but obviously as you'd expect needed to be quarantined. The lack of testing available made a stressful experience 100x worse and more difficult for everyone involved here. Staff absences have skyrocketed and most care homes aren't willing to take on agency staff/send staff to other struggling care homes when need be. Everyone is doing the best they can but it just seems like a catastrophe waiting to happen. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.