Jump to content

Coronavirus (COVID-19)


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Detournement said:

Highest cases are the people who leave the house the most. 

You could make a case for the 20-24 group to have highest case rates - look at the table.  That's 397 for a five year group ( average 79 per year) and 1340 for a twenty year group (average 67 per year)....similarly the high number of young children infected is spead over fifteen  ages. (54)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bairnardo said:

Highest cases are the people who havent been vaccinated. 

 

Anyone interpreting it differently at this stage is either desperate for a childish argument (fair enough tbh) or desperate for continued restriction.

I'm not desperate for any argument nor do I want restrictions for 1 more day than is required, I just thought the figures pretty clearly supported the view that schools are pushing transmission of the virus here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, we'll just have to get on with it, won't we?
You can sit in the garden, it's not like you'll be stuck indoors.
"We" as if you're not a 90 year old pensioner.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, The Moonster said:

As I've said, even in the over 60 category these days the number of people who do not have a mobile will likely be tiny. I'm sure local councils/GPs can arrange some sort of card which digitally holds their vaccine info for them if they are unable to get access to a phone. I've got about 4 old phones in my house that I would happily give to any friends or family who need one, I'm sure you and plenty others would do the same. Nobody needs to sign up to EE on an 18 month deal. This is what I mean when I said people are making it out to be much worse than it actually will be. 

There's about 20% of people don't have a bank account, I'd be surprised if there's not a similar or larger % without a smartphone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Caledonian1 said:

You could make a case for the 20-24 group to have highest case rates - look at the table.  That's 397 for a five year group ( average 79 per year) and 1340 for a twenty year group (average 67 per year)....similarly the high number of young children infected is spead over fifteen  ages. (54)

Is not per million of population for each group?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My main takeaway from the figures are that cases may well be rising, and have been for 3 weeks or so, but hospitalisations are not. That *should* see us drop the obsession with case numbers..
A lot of people have said similar on here. Myself included. Once case numbers become irrelevant, so do case drivers.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Cosmic Joe said:

You'll presumably be basing this decision on you being in a tiny minority of equally selfish people. 

You can guarantee his reasons for not getting it will be based on moon-howling pseudoscience that's been widely discredited outwith his own social media echo chamber. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not desperate for any argument nor do I want restrictions for 1 more day than is required, I just thought the figures pretty clearly supported the view that schools are pushing transmission of the virus here. 
As will everything else as we open back up. It's called getting back to normal. The virus will not have magically disappeared, it will be rife amongst unvaccinated cohorts but as long as the hospital numbers and deaths stay low it will be largely irrelevant.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Billy Jean King said:
1 hour ago, The Moonster said:
I'm not desperate for any argument nor do I want restrictions for 1 more day than is required, I just thought the figures pretty clearly supported the view that schools are pushing transmission of the virus here. 

As will everything else as we open back up. It's called getting back to normal. The virus will not have magically disappeared, it will be rife amongst unvaccinated cohorts but as long as the hospital numbers and deaths stay low it will be largely irrelevant.

I don't think it's anyone on P&B you need to convince of this tbh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Billy Jean King said:

As will everything else as we open back up. It's called getting back to normal. The virus will not have magically disappeared, it will be rife amongst unvaccinated cohorts but as long as the hospital numbers and deaths stay low it will be largely irrelevant.

Agreed. Doesn't fit with the narrative that schools are safe though, which is what we've been told.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...