Jump to content

Coronavirus (COVID-19)


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Granny Danger said:

There’s a large element of that, at the same time if the economy goes completely tits up I can take a guess at those who will suffer the most.

I agree but that’s down to the nature of business and the economy that allowed people to be in debt so much.

Its a bigger picture that needs looked at, the solution to being in debt appears to be buy more stuff and do more things and get in more debt. Who is benefiting from this? Certainly not the people in debt.

Its also the economy that allowed banks to become richer and public services to become almost non existent. As soon as there’s a recovery all the heroes and people who deserve wage rises will be forgotten about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a hard choice but if the economy tanks then more people die. The government can't pay the wages indefinitely. 

Going back to work is not to keep the rich in their mansions, it's to put bread on the table. 

The difficulty is the timing and strategy. Can people outside London be allowed back to work earlier than the epicentre of the outbreak?

Glad I'm not the one making the decisions because no matter what you do you will be wrong in someone's eyes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ICTJohnboy said:

I would have to say that was one of the gov/t's better press conferences.

Richey Sunak not half as woolly and indecisive as the likes of Hancock and Raab. He did attempt to answer most of these questions and managed to avoid bringing the whole thing down to a complete and utter field of bullshit.

Wouldn't be surprised if the chattering classes try and make Sunak the new Rory Stewart off the back of this and gush about him while he's implementing Austerity 2.0 for the next decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jacksgranda said:

I was. @kingjoey would be, too. Not sure about @Raidernation anyway I think he was brought up in Sutherlandshire. There are quite a few supporters of other teams who would have been alive back then, just not necessarily living in Aberdeen.

I was at primary school in Kincardine O’Neil at the time, and just remember not being allowed to go into Aberdeen for however long it was. I remember it as being exciting, but I was only wee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NotThePars said:

Wouldn't be surprised if the chattering classes try and make Sunak the new Rory Stewart off the back of this and gush about him while he's implementing Austerity 2.0 for the next decade.

 

More like the next twenty years, but at least for them, that would be a step in the right direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ICTJohnboy said:

 

More like the next twenty years, but at least for them, that would be a step in the right direction.

I will be happy to slave away in the salt mines as long as dinner party guests in Zone Two have a serious and respectable Tory they can tell everyone that they actually like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Suspect Device said:

It's a hard choice but if the economy tanks then more people die. The government can't pay the wages indefinitely. 

Going back to work is not to keep the rich in their mansions, it's to put bread on the table. 

The difficulty is the timing and strategy. Can people outside London be allowed back to work earlier than the epicentre of the outbreak?

Glad I'm not the one making the decisions because no matter what you do you will be wrong in someone's eyes.

I agree it is to put bread on the table, keeping the rich in their mansions is, however, a by-product.

I can’t help but think if the restrictions had been introduced earlier and were more restrictive then a phased relaxation may have been easier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, D.A.F.C said:

I agree but that’s down to the nature of business and the economy that allowed people to be in debt so much.

Its a bigger picture that needs looked at, the solution to being in debt appears to be buy more stuff and do more things and get in more debt. Who is benefiting from this? Certainly not the people in debt.

Its also the economy that allowed banks to become richer and public services to become almost non existent. As soon as there’s a recovery all the heroes and people who deserve wage rises will be forgotten about.

That's always the way of it.

Debt is the great solution for the wealthy and powerful as it means they don't need to pay the wages to people as the people themselves just borrow and pay back (sometimes) to attain things which they couldn't normally afford, meanwhile the rich are the ones actually lending the money and gaining again as they pull in the capital and interest. This keeps wages low and ensures the money slushes around the top.

That's drip down economics for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, superbigal said:

heart specialist I know believes that everyone being at home , not working, not driving or in effect less stress is the main reason that admissions for heart attacks etc is hugely down.

 

 

Really?  I’d imagine there must be lots of folk under more stress than normal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder what the estimates are for dead bodies across the UK in houses where people live alone and have no family/friends?

Can someone drive round the country tallying up milk bottles sitting outside houses?

Edited by Alert Mongoose
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Theroadlesstravelled said:

Matt Baker, Sir Lenny Henry, Davina McCall, Peter Kay and Gary Barlow will be providing entertainment from their homes in the programme.


I'd rather go outside and get coronavirus.

I thought they were dead...shite!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's always the way of it.
Debt is the great solution for the wealthy and powerful as it means they don't need to pay the wages to people as the people themselves just borrow and pay back (sometimes) to attain things which they couldn't normally afford, meanwhile the rich are the ones actually lending the money and gaining again as they pull in the capital and interest. This keeps wages low and ensures the money slushes around the top.
That's drip down economics for you.
People need to break out of the loop by stopping buying shit they dont need or cant afford. I'm as guilty as anyone not trying to say I dont.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Suspect Device said:

It's a hard choice but if the economy tanks then more people die. The government can't pay the wages indefinitely. 

Going back to work is not to keep the rich in their mansions, it's to put bread on the table. 

The difficulty is the timing and strategy. Can people outside London be allowed back to work earlier than the epicentre of the outbreak?

Glad I'm not the one making the decisions because no matter what you do you will be wrong in someone's eyes.

The time that will hurt is when Tesco aren't getting supplies anymore. With most factories and farms just ticking over at most, the lockdown can't keep going forever. That's not including all the people getting zero money coming in because they fall between the emergency welfare provisions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Alert Mongoose said:

I wonder what the estimates are for dead bodies across the UK in houses where people live alone and have no family/friends?

Not that unusual in normal times.

In this lockdown stand bye for this happening in numbers in coming weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jacksgranda said:

Not if they've no money they won't. If the government says it's safe to go to work, they're not going to be paying the 80% support/grant/loan thing and employers are hardly likely to pay you to stay at home if you're fit for work.

True but going to work if you have to is different from firing up the pictures or down M&Ds on your days off. If it's not safe, people will stay in as much as they possibly can

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, doulikefish said:

According to the wee bit I was able to read, this firm has a contract with NHS England, so it's hardly surprising if they prioritise England. Who do have NHS Scotland have a contract with? (Apologies if that is answered further on in the article)>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Theroadlesstravelled said:

Matt Baker, Sir Lenny Henry, Davina McCall, Peter Kay and Gary Barlow will be providing entertainment from their homes in the programme.


I'd rather go outside and get coronavirus.

Try it and report back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...