Benjamin_Nevis Posted February 10, 2021 Share Posted February 10, 2021 3 minutes ago, D.V.T. said: 57,000 jags - some going considering the weather That's tremendous. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
super_carson Posted February 10, 2021 Share Posted February 10, 2021 Test positivity dipped under 5% too. Hopefully in the next week or two we start to see the effect of the vaccinations kick in for case numbers and hospitalisations. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Jean King Posted February 10, 2021 Share Posted February 10, 2021 Places of worship being given any sort of preference is rage-inducing. Pray in the bloody house FFS. Schools are expected, but really there needs to be a plan to vaccinate at least secondary school kids. Schools will have the distinction of being the only non-vaccinated setting by August and therefore are basically going to keep the virus in circulation. Perhaps school kids aren't impacted in the same way as some are, but given what we keep hearing about spread of the virus and can't be sure vaccines stop that, schools risk pulling us all down. Not to mention the famous quote that R can't be kept below 1 thanks to the "more infectious Kent variant". There us no vaccine licensed for use in U16s. They are starting twice weekly testing using home tests from 1 March in South Ayrshire to permit the return of the S4-6 pupils doing practical work. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G51 Posted February 10, 2021 Share Posted February 10, 2021 5 minutes ago, super_carson said: No one is stopping anyone practicing faith freely, there has been no ban on religion or religious festivals either. In fact, many religions have adapted well, providing online services and hopefully, when the weather improves, outdoor services. You mentioned a free society. Is it right, fair, or free, that business are forced into closures as a result of government legislation? We aren't living in a free society right now, and places of worship need to wait their turn. They won't help the economy bounce back which is, at this moment in time, far more important than communal prayers or services. These restrictions absolutely prevent people from practicing faith freely. Aside from all Christian festivals that we're aware of, prayers for Ramadan, Eid, Passover and many more were cancelled. On top of that, religious buildings often provide vital support for the poorest and most vulnerable in society. Lots of people who benefit from this support aren't necessarily eligible for government support, for a wide range of fairly obvious reasons. Is it right that businesses are forced into closure? No. And we will re-open them. But in the order of prioritization, non-essential businesses have to come behind religious places of worship. If it doesn't, we risk becoming a society that discriminates against minority religions in particular. The economy is not a justification for re-opening businesses. Especially when you consider that the economy is little more than the moral teachings of Adam Smith. -7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael W Posted February 10, 2021 Share Posted February 10, 2021 1 minute ago, Billy Jean King said: 29 minutes ago, Michael W said: Places of worship being given any sort of preference is rage-inducing. Pray in the bloody house FFS. Schools are expected, but really there needs to be a plan to vaccinate at least secondary school kids. Schools will have the distinction of being the only non-vaccinated setting by August and therefore are basically going to keep the virus in circulation. Perhaps school kids aren't impacted in the same way as some are, but given what we keep hearing about spread of the virus and can't be sure vaccines stop that, schools risk pulling us all down. Not to mention the famous quote that R can't be kept below 1 thanks to the "more infectious Kent variant". There us no vaccine licensed for use in U16s. They are starting twice weekly testing using home tests from 1 March in South Ayrshire to permit the return of the S4-6 pupils doing practical work. Seems like something we can achieve in due course though. U16s already receive a number of vaccinations presently so no reason we can't get a vaccine licensed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G51 Posted February 10, 2021 Share Posted February 10, 2021 6 minutes ago, Burnieman said: Secular means religion plays no part in Govt. The State is seperate from the Church. So as a secular society, religion should not influence Govt decision making or hold any form of priority in such circumstances. That is not what secular means. There is nothing in the definition about separation of church and state. Religion should not influence government decision, but that is not relevant to the question being asked. -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jan Vojáček Posted February 10, 2021 Share Posted February 10, 2021 A tremendous number of jabs and a positivity rate under 5 percent. I'm away to book two weeks in Cape Town for the start of May. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gc_smfc Posted February 10, 2021 Share Posted February 10, 2021 Can I get my barber to meet me in a place of worship for a trim? 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todd_is_God Posted February 10, 2021 Share Posted February 10, 2021 (edited) But religion is, to be quite blunt, not real. We shouldn't be bending over backwards to prioritise and appease people who live their lives based on what a fictional character says. Edited February 10, 2021 by Todd_is_God 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doulikefish Posted February 10, 2021 Share Posted February 10, 2021 Just now, Jan Vojáček said: A tremendous number of jabs and a positivity rate under 5 percent. I'm away to book two weeks in Cape Town for the start of May. May i recommend staying down by the V and A waterfront 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Jean King Posted February 10, 2021 Share Posted February 10, 2021 I must admit, I've been pretty pro Gov throughout this and thought erring on the side of caution was the way to go to try and stop as many deaths / serious illness as possible, however I've now got to the completely cheesed off point as there now seems no way out of this ?? We have the vaccines that they all heralded, we have all the new drugs and treatments that they said would stop lots of the fatalities, we've got a much better understanding of dealing with the virus, we've had major restrictions for months (approaching a full year) and yet over the past few days the rhetoric coming from all Governments appears to be that it's pointless, it's all been in vain and these restrictions will NEED to continue indefinitely !! Why ?? I thought it was about stopping deaths and serious illness, so have we not achieved that ?? Either the vaccine works or it doesn't surely ???? So, is this it ? is this life forever more ??, is this all we have to live for ??? The fact people are actually defending the banning of holidays just shows how screwed up / subservient our population has become, well, I'm sorry, but this simply can't go on indefinitely, another way out is needed and needed fast, before we all go bloody insane !!!This ^^^ If the vaccines have been approved too early and aren't as effective than needed to open back up just admit that as that's what it's beginning to sound like. However we know there will be no admission of error never mind guilt from Johnson and co.The great British summer was the rhetoric just 2 weeks ago, what has changed or is it just more populist soundbites ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Left Back Posted February 10, 2021 Share Posted February 10, 2021 3 minutes ago, G51 said: That is not what secular means. There is nothing in the definition about separation of church and state. Religion should not influence government decision, but that is not relevant to the question being asked. a secular society is exactly that where the church has no influence over government policy. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burnieman Posted February 10, 2021 Share Posted February 10, 2021 That is not what secular means. There is nothing in the definition about separation of church and state. Religion should not influence government decision, but that is not relevant to the question being asked.It's exactly what it means, and in a secular society a church has no more standing than a pub or hairdressers. Enjoy yer night.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G51 Posted February 10, 2021 Share Posted February 10, 2021 1 minute ago, Left Back said: a secular society is exactly that where the church has no influence over government policy. Agreed - but this is not what was being contested. Scotland is a secular society with church and state separated - correct. Scotland is a multi-faith country with a large number of secular people - also correct. There is no contradiction between those two statements. Both things are good. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superbigal Posted February 10, 2021 Share Posted February 10, 2021 Per 100 thousand surely?!Corrected per million 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Am Featha Taigh Nan Clach Posted February 10, 2021 Share Posted February 10, 2021 Distinct lack of deeply concerned 'well, they're going to have to do x no. vaccinations a day to hit the mid Feb target now!' posts in the last week or so. 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 10, 2021 Share Posted February 10, 2021 7 minutes ago, G51 said: The economy is not a justification for re-opening businesses. Especially when you consider that the economy is little more than the moral teachings of Adam Smith. This sounds a lot less clever than you think it does. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PWL Posted February 10, 2021 Share Posted February 10, 2021 Can the opposition parties not ask a sensible question with regards to timetable and conditions for easing restrictions rather than focusing on the non issue of Mr Tickle Salmond?! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 10, 2021 Share Posted February 10, 2021 21 minutes ago, latapythelegend said: So does the fact that some people can afford multiple holidays a year (probably less than 10% of the general population) mean they should be able to go where and when they want? Some retirees who want to spend the winter in the sun for months on end probably have a very comfortable life at home anyway through lockdown so cry me a river. The general point still stands. Well Yes !!! Incidentally, it doesn't cost very much for a long stay in November - March, I could do you 5 weeks to Portugal, 4* SC with flights included for under £250 per person. Just pm me ! Long weekend to Poland (3 nts), 5* B&B, flights included for under £150 per person. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forest_Fifer Posted February 10, 2021 Share Posted February 10, 2021 Sadly writing a book is beyond Grant, instead it's one of these, a truly bizarre thing to have on your book shelf.Maybe it's just so that people will know who the f**k he is. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.