RossBFaeDundee Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 14 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dee Bliss Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 28 minutes ago, RedEd said: Are they really? Is it in the best interests of Scottish football to delay payment to clubs who might need the money now, rather than in a month or two? And these clubs aren't being greedy. Many of them lead a hand to mouth existence. Please keep up. Those payments could’ve been made as loans if applied for. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bad chad Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 Can Thistle or ITC please just change their vote to yes? I'll take relegation just to stop Dundee from rasing their skirts an inch or two every now and then, before deciding their not going to go full gusset at the end of it all 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rb123! Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 7 minutes ago, Granny Danger said: The people running Scottish football are those that the clubs appoint to run Scottish football. I’m not sure why people struggle to understand this. Fucking hell, what one earth were the clubs smoking when they decided to appoint Doncaster 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rb123! Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 I'm just hoping for Dundee United to come out with a statement which has a finely veiled swipe at Dundee, would spice things up to the next level 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Flash Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 18 minutes ago, Ad Lib said: The Thistle statement is a pretty good summary in plain English of what the lawyers are saying. On the Dundee Rejection vote specifically they're saying: "you sent a No vote shortly before 5pm. That had effect as soon as you sent it not when the SPFL received it. That means 3 Championship votes against, the resolution officially defeated. What Dundee did or did not send you at 6pm therefore doesn't matter. Nae points, p***k" Are they not also suggesting that the overall vote wasn’t valid because the clubs were given insufficient information prior to the vote? If they are right about that, they’re asking for Dundee’s vote to count in an overall vote that wasn’t valid. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludo*1 Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 Just now, rb123! said: I'm just hoping for Dundee United to come out with a statement which has a finely veiled swipe at Dundee, would spice things up to the next level They're too busy arguing with fan groups at the moment. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop Briggs Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 5 minutes ago, bad chad said: Can Thistle or ITC please just change their vote to yes? I'll take relegation just to stop Dundee from rasing their skirts an inch or two every now and then, before deciding their not going to go full gusset at the end of it all The Jags' legal advice says that No votes cannot be changed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rainbowrising Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 9 minutes ago, Granny Danger said: The people running Scottish football are those that the clubs appoint to run Scottish football. I’m not sure why people struggle to understand this. Including Sevco, a club claiming the SPFL is riddled with corruption. Their own man in that I presume. What do clubs do with and perceive of this apparently secretive organisation? Who are these people?! As a man once said of a group he had met and spoken to. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulbrucerick Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Sergeant Wilson said: Confused? You will be! One for the older viewer there! Edited April 14, 2020 by paulbrucerick 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fifespud Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 Seems to be a distinct lack of gloating Dayglos all of a sudden. Perhaps you’ve spaffed your jizz a little prematurely lads. I like the fact we are defending the integrity of Scottish football and I fucking love the fact we are doing everything in our power to keep the DABs doon [emoji4] 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted April 14, 2020 Author Share Posted April 14, 2020 3 minutes ago, rb123! said: Fucking hell, what one earth were the clubs smoking when they decided to appoint Doncaster Doncaster doesn’t take the big decision on his own. The people that do are appointed by the clubs. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop Briggs Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 Just now, Granny Danger said: Doncaster doesn’t take the big decision on his own. The people that do are appointed by the Old Firm and their puppets. FTFY 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 1 minute ago, Flash said: Are they not also suggesting that the overall vote wasn’t valid because the clubs were given insufficient information prior to the vote? If they are right about that, they’re asking for Dundee’s vote to count in an overall vote that wasn’t valid. They are alternative arguments. If there was no other impropriety about the vote, it should be regarded as a rejection because 3 Nos in Championship lodged. But Thistle also thinks there was impropriety about the manner in which the proposal was put, therefore if it is still live (for whatever reason) it should be withdrawn and a fresh proposition put. Either outcome of which is "go back to the drawing board please, this vote died, like Rangers." 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted April 14, 2020 Author Share Posted April 14, 2020 Just now, Bishop Briggs said: FTFY That’s taking conspiracy theories to a new Celtic level. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RossBFaeDundee Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 4 minutes ago, rb123! said: I'm just hoping for Dundee United to come out with a statement which has a finely veiled swipe at Dundee, would spice things up to the next level They're too busy fighting with their own fans at the moment unfortunately. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rainbowrising Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 1 minute ago, Bishop Briggs said: The Jags' legal advice says that No votes cannot be changed. You misunderstand my point (I may have misunderstood yours!). I mean that a No would lead to a possible new proposal tweaked to suit to get a YES vote, rather than steam rolling any No vote at the time. The SPFL would sound out a close vote (like this) to see what could be done and put a new proposal in to vote on. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 4 minutes ago, Bishop Briggs said: The Jags' legal advice says that No votes cannot be changed. All the more important to find out if and when the vote was sent and what happened to it. 4 minutes ago, paulbrucerick said: One for the older viewer there! Confused... You will be. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bad chad Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 8 minutes ago, Sergeant Wilson said: THAT is a blast from the past 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.