Jump to content

Lowland League 2020/21 General Chat


FairWeatherFan

Recommended Posts

Given its highly unlikely the SPFL lawyer will say anything different to the SFA lawyer. How does the SPFL save face? Might we instead see the SPFL invite the winner of the LL/HL playoff to join, but via an invite rather than via the pyramid playoff, leaving club 42 (Brechin) in L2, so then running with an odd number in L2 next season only. Then rebalance at the end of next season with club 43 then automatically relegated from L2 but no promotion back in and going back to 42. Then with the pyramid playoff back to normal in 2022/23. That way the spfl can maintain a view that kelty/Brora aren't  in their eyes legit entrants into the pyramid playoff with out challenging the SFA view that they are legit champions of the LL and HL. The issue with that being ofcourse there would be no possible promotion for the LL/HL next season but for 1 season only. Would the winner of the Brora/Kelty playoff really care they would be going into L2 by invite rather than via a club 42 playoff? Possibly not. Plus they don't run the risk of losing to club 42 in the playoff. The other drawback for the existing SPFL clubs being that club 43 next season could be one of them with automatic relegation but it would only be a risk for 1 season only.

Edited by morley
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Fifes Elite Force said:

Was I right in thinking that the decision was suppose to be made at the SPFL AGM yesterday if Kelty and Brora met the criteria to compete for an SPFL place? I haven't seen anything.

1) There was no SPFL AGM yesterday 2) Your second point was just a supposition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, morley said:

Given its highly unlikely the SPFL lawyer will say anything different to the SFA lawyer. How does the SPFL save face? Might we instead see the SPFL invite the winner of the LL/HL playoff to join, but via an invite rather than via the pyramid playoff, leaving club 42 (Brechin) in L2, so then running with an odd number in L2 next season only. Then rebalance at the end of next season with club 43 then automatically relegated from L2 but no promotion back in and going back to 42. Then with the pyramid playoff back to normal in 2022/23. That way the spfl can maintain a view that kelty/Brora aren't  in their eyes legit entrants into the pyramid playoff with out challenging the SFA view that they are legit champions of the LL and HL. The issue with that being ofcourse there would be no possible promotion for the LL/HL next season but for 1 season only. Would the winner of the Brora/Kelty playoff really care they would be going into L2 by invite rather than via a club 42 playoff? Possibly not. Plus they don't run the risk of losing to club 42 in the playoff. The other drawback for the existing SPFL clubs being that club 43 next season could be one of them with automatic relegation but it would only be a risk for 1 season only.

These matters depend on the particular point/s a QC is asked to rule on.  The view of one lawyer can easily be contradicted by another - otherwise we wouldn’t bother with a court system.  Adding clubs to the mix is maybe a tenable solution - did it happen last year?  You need 11 premier clubs to agree to that - how do you get that and on what basis?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Confirmed that Brechin have written  to the SPFL board claiming it would be “fundamentally unfair” to hold play-offs between club 42 and winner of Highland and Lowland league play-off(based on games played by Brora and Kelty).

They propose league reconstruction with no relegation, expanding League 2 to 12 clubs.

Here we go again with reconstruction chat! 

Edited by Bundesliga Boy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bundesliga Boy said:

Confirmed that Brechin have written  to the SPFL board claiming it would be “fundamentally unfair” to hold play-offs between club 42 and winner of Highland and Lowland league play-off(based on games played by Brora and Kelty).They propose league reconstruction with no relegation, expanding League 2 to 12 clubs. Here we go again with reconstruction chat! Confirmed Brechin have written  to the SPFL board claiming it would be “fundamentally unfair” to hold play-offs between club 42 and winner of Highland and Lowland league play-off(based on games played by Brora and Kelty).They propose league reconstruction with no relegation, expanding League 2 to 12 clubs.
 

Here we go again with reconstruction chat! 

Regardless of any opinions on the situation, we cannot trust the SPFL to pass reconstruction proposals. Last summer proved that.

Its time for Brechin to accept that they are where they are on merit. Their escape routes are closing off fast, while any goodwill is being lost (even amongst their own fanbase).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Born To Run said:

Regardless of any opinions on the situation, we cannot trust the SPFL to pass reconstruction proposals. Last summer proved that.

Its time for Brechin to accept that they are where they are on merit. Their escape routes are closing off fast, while any goodwill is being lost (even amongst their own fanbase).

Completely agree! 
 

Should be an enforced playoff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Born To Run said:

Regardless of any opinions on the situation, we cannot trust the SPFL to pass reconstruction proposals. Last summer proved that.

Its time for Brechin to accept that they are where they are on merit. Their escape routes are closing off fast, while any goodwill is being lost (even amongst their own fanbase).

Reconstruction needs a) Premiership clubs to agree and b) League Two clubs to agree as well? Do Brechin have enough friends to even make it happen?

And of course you then have the situation where promotion/relegation between the Premiership, Championship and League 1 is going ahead despite playing different amounts of games.

What happens next year when Brora and Kelty are mid-table and it's Brechin or another established SPFL club at the bottom - more reconstruction?

Edited by Ginaro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Cowden Cowboy said:

1) There was no SPFL AGM yesterday 2) Your second point was just a supposition. 

You are right on the first part it was a meeting rather than AGM, However there was no supposition (from me anyway) it was a question. But it was based on something too.

 

SPFL site states 

"At its meeting on 19 April, the SPFL Board will determine whether each of Kelty Hearts and Brora Rangers meet the SPFL’s Membership Criteria.  Only then will the SPFL be in a position to announce the position in respect of Pyramid Play-Offs this season."

Ken Ferguson steps down from SPFL Board | SPFL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully the holdup on naming fixture dates is mainly related to waiting for this evening's set of League 2 fixtures to be completed before providing the fixture dates for the four extra games in the two five team sections.

Edited by LongTimeLurker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Fifes Elite Force said:

You are right on the first part it was a meeting rather than AGM, However there was no supposition (from me anyway) it was a question. But it was based on something too.

 

SPFL site states 

"At its meeting on 19 April, the SPFL Board will determine whether each of Kelty Hearts and Brora Rangers meet the SPFL’s Membership Criteria.  Only then will the SPFL be in a position to announce the position in respect of Pyramid Play-Offs this season."

Ken Ferguson steps down from SPFL Board | SPFL

Thus it was the SPFL Board not the meeting of clubs that was to consider that matter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Cowden Cowboy said:

Thus it was the SPFL Board not the meeting of clubs that was to consider that matter

I wasn't really bothered about getting ins and outs of who specifically in the spfl was deciding (and you never mentioned that it was to be decided at a board meeting rather than AGM just a statement to say there was no AGM). I was asking the outcome of the decision yesterday (if it went ahead) and it clearly wasn't a supposition going by it was reported in the media and on the spfl site that yesterday a decision was going to be made on the criteria of both teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...