ToatieScone Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArabianKnight Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 It's probably a 4-3-1-2 IMO. McGinn behind the strikers 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afca32 Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 4-4-2 diamond with that personnel? Although McTominay wearing 4 might suggest 3-5-2. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RossBFaeDundee Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 Just now, ArabianKnight said: It's probably a 4-3-1-2 IMO. McGinn behind the strikers If that's the case, I could almost say that that's about as good as it could be for us tonight. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accies1874 Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 It's probably a 4-3-1-2 IMO. McGinn behind the strikersI wouldn't be unhappy with that but it's going to be a back 5. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArabianKnight Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 Just now, RossBFaeDundee said: If that's the case, I could almost say that that's about as good as it could be for us tonight. Well personally I'd prefer Shanks over McBurnie alongside Dykes but I'm biased. I'm probably wrong and McTominay is in the back 3 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RossBFaeDundee Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 (edited) Edited October 8, 2020 by RossBFaeDundee 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accies1874 Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 4-4-2 diamond with that personnel? Although McTominay wearing 4 might suggest 3-5-2.I'm clutching at straws but the number 4 has been used for midfielders in the last few games. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the snudge Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 Didn't see 2 strikers starting. I hope it works. The Israeli side have a right back at left back. Suddenly feeling a bit more confident. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyle Lanley Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigkillie Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 There's absolutely no pace in that team no matter what formation we play. Not convinced by the front pairing together either, both a bit too similar. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bernardblack Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 That’s a back five surely? Mctominay at centre half again 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshmallo Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 Recorded myself reading the starting XI Cg0kLDNZp65BCZJp_1.mp4 -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No_Problemo Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 My first thought is it’s three at the back - hoping to f**k not though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DA Baracus Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 Could he maybe have Burke and McGregor or McGinn out wide? Will be very interested to see how this team line up 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RossBFaeDundee Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 1 minute ago, bernardblack said: That’s a back five surely? Mctominay at centre half again If it is I might just get the 'slamming my head into the wall' part done early. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigkillie Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 Just now, DA Baracus said: Could he maybe have Burke and McGregor or McGinn out wide? Will be very interested to see how this team line up Burke isn't playing (and pulled out midweek), not sure who you mean here. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshmallo Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 It's definitely the back five again. Don't mind the midfield three in fairness, would rather have Fleck instead of Jack but it should be pretty well balanced. -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Staggie_93 Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 3 minutes ago, bernardblack said: That’s a back five surely? Mctominay at centre half again I’ll be watching through my fingers if that’s the case. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IggyStooge Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.