Jump to content

Govan vs Dingwall - Saturday 23rd


Recommended Posts

Every Bear's favourite former Celt has been playing mind games with us with such comments as,  "I could sit here and wax lyrical about Rangers because their style of play is right up my street".

So how will Yogi set up his team for Ibrox on Saturday?  To allow decent football or to snuff us out?

I'd be staggered if we lost - though it's possible - but will go for a home win.

Edited by The_Kincardine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After our green n grey friends slip up on Wednesday we need to take full advantage and get 3 points, a big test of this teams bottle.

Should we go with 2 strikers for this game, Morelos and Itten?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jack will be in the squad for tomorrow, Roofe will be a late decision.

If Roofe is fit, put him in. If he isn't, go with Itten. Also, Jack needs some time - we could really use him for Hibs away.

McGregor, Tavernier, Goldson, Helander, Barisic, Davis, Kamara, Roofe/Itten, Aribo, Kent, Morelos

Back to the 4-2-3-1 that we ditched.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, yoda said:

This fixture always reminds of the time, in an Inverness pub, that a staunch Highland Rangers fan called me a "****** b*****d" because of my name.

Did you have a name tag on your jacket?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Rangers are playing as well as they were at one point, but it's still better (by a distance) than anything else in the league. Yogi won't sit back as much as Ketts would have done, but I'd still expect a 4-3-3 that is more of a 4-5-1. Naismith - Morris- Iacovitti - Randall expected (if fit) at the back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Comrie said:

I don't think Rangers are playing as well as they were at one point, but it's still better (by a distance) than anything else in the league. Yogi won't sit back as much as Ketts would have done, but I'd still expect a 4-3-3 that is more of a 4-5-1. Naismith - Morris- Iacovitti - Randall expected (if fit) at the back.

Yeah, I hope he sticks with a 433 too, hopefully it'll be something like this.

Laidlaw

Naismith Morris Iacovitti Randall

Paton Vigurs Lakin

Hylton Shaw Stewart

 

Subs. Munro, Watson, Reid, Draper, Tillson, Gardyne, Andreu, Charles-Cook, McKay

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the lads start the game like they've just fell out of bed then I wouldn't be surprised if they got something out of it. Rangers need to take full advantage of Yogi's Gung-ho antics and break them on the counter or just not let them come out of their own half and pummel their goal mouth. Can't stress enough how important it is for the squad to re-ignite the fire for the performances. 

Looking forward to it though, I've been chomping for this all week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMG_4230.jpg

A strange, strange lineup.

I make it 541 with Lakin and Paton as the wingers.

Laidlaw

Naismith. Hjelde Morris Iacovitti Randall


Paton Draper Vigurs Lakin


Shaw

Kinda wanted Yogi to just go for it as the game was a free hit and we’re unlikely to get anything anyway so would’ve been good to test ourselves toe to toe with whatever Rangers put up against us but can’t see anything other than 11 men behind the barracades now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Matty-RCFC said:

IMG_4230.jpg

A strange, strange lineup.

I make it 541 with Lakin and Paton as the wingers.

Laidlaw

Naismith. Hjelde Morris Iacovitti Randall


Paton Draper Vigurs Lakin


Shaw

Kinda wanted Yogi to just go for it as the game was a free hit and we’re unlikely to get anything anyway so would’ve been good to test ourselves toe to toe with whatever Rangers put up against us but can’t see anything other than 11 men behind the barracades now.

 

I thought that at first too but maybe it's Randall at RM in front of Naismith, making it 451. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...