Wee-Bey Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 Mr Gorbachev, tear down my back walls. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongTimeLurker Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 9 hours ago, dorlomin said: ...A Javelin is no less lethal to a modern tank than a Panzerfaust was to a Sherman or T-34. Probably true in some ways but did you not have to be in very close with a panzerfaust and hence highly likely to get mown down in the immediate aftermath? Not quite as risky to take out a tank nowadays when you can be two miles away and it's a case of fire and forget. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 (edited) 9 hours ago, Stringer Bell said: Mr Gorbachev, tear down my back walls. Cyprus wouldn't be the thriving economy it is today was last year without Mikhail Gorbachev tearing down the front walls. Putin's little adventure is putting them all back up, bang goes the timeshare in Limassol for Moscow's middle management cadre. Everybody loses, apart from arms companies and commodity speculators. Edited August 31, 2022 by welshbairn 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxRover Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 21 minutes ago, LongTimeLurker said: Probably true in some ways but did you not have to be in very close with a panzerfaust and hence highly likely to get mown down in the immediate aftermath? Not quite as risky to take out a tank nowadays when you can be two miles away and it's a case of fire and forget. Panzerfausts came in 30, 60, 100 and 150 metre range versions, so you had to pop, shoot and scoot…and that usually resulted in death if there was any infantry nearby. Effective range was about half the rated range due to accuracy and not velocity (as the shaped charge didn’t care a whit what velocity it stuck a target at). Javelin has an effective range of between 2,500 and 4,750 metres, which allows stand-off engagements, but in a cluttered area (urban environment, forested areas, etc) the range can be much less. The minimum range for a Javelin engagement is around 500m, which would be well within the covered perimeter of a properly deployed combined arms force, and would likely be deadly to the Javelin team. Shooting from further away increases survivability, but often comes at a cost in accuracy…the ideal attack range is thus dependent upon the enemy deployments and the environment. The more apt comparison to the Panzerfaust would be the NLAW, with a 20-800m effective range, and a straight-line flight path. While it was extremely effective during the initial attack, it’s now more of a counter hard-target weapon due to the Ukrainian advances. Its relatively short range and flat flight path, compared to the Javelin, has resulted in it becoming almost ineffective/suicidal vs dug-in armoured units with supporting infantry. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongTimeLurker Posted September 1, 2022 Share Posted September 1, 2022 (edited) 20 hours ago, dorlomin said: The reason everything is so static is neither side has the excess of forces to build up the kind of multi echelon force power to break into a layered defence then have the troops available for the next echelons to break out and take large amounts of territory, combined with both having severe logistics constraints... If twitter commentary is to be believed (dubious at best obviously) there is some talk of that kind of thing happening on a small scale onthe Ukrainian side yesterday south of Davydiv Brid in Kherson oblast where they already had a smzll bridgehead across the Inhulets river: Edited September 1, 2022 by LongTimeLurker 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fullerene Posted September 1, 2022 Share Posted September 1, 2022 On 31/08/2022 at 06:30, virginton said: Not even a shred of awareness in this laughable take: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/aug/30/gorbachev-political-legacy-destroyed-by-putin 1) There was no NATO-Soviet frontier during the Cold War. It was a NATO-Warsaw Pact frontier. One of those Cold War alliance systems was disbanded - NATO however was not because it was a vehicle for continued American imperialism. 2) NATO's rush eastwards was actually decided in the 1990s, when the pinky promise that Gorbachev accepted that it would not expand proved to be utterly useless. That - along with the 60+ million people dumped into abject poverty - is why Gorbachev is viewed as an arch-chump rather than a 'great statesman' by his own people. His legacy was trashed by his own stupid actions and the domestic/international brigade of looters he enabled. The main reason NATO still exists is because countries feel safer inside it than not. Sweden and Finland haven't suddenly acquired an enthusiasm for US imperialism. Countries in the Warsaw Pact did not feel safer inside it. In fact the threat cames from within, namely the Soviet Union. Witness the invasions of Hungary and Czechoslovakia simply for going off message. NATO's rush eastwards was caused by the distrust of these countries towards Russia. They also feel safer inside the alliance. Georgia and Ukraine and Moldova have demonstrated they were right. The Soviet Union was crap. It relied on terror to keep the system working. Once Gorbachev reduced the terror, the whole thing collapsed and he was condemned for not anticipating this would happen or having anything in place afterwards. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fullerene Posted September 1, 2022 Share Posted September 1, 2022 I like the joke Gorbachev said himself. Two men are standing in a long queue for something. One of them says "This is terrible. I blame Gorbachev. I am going off to shoot him" and he walks away. Five minutes later he is back. His friend says "I thought you going to shoot Gorbachev". He replies "That queue is longer". 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted September 1, 2022 Share Posted September 1, 2022 1 hour ago, Fullerene said: The main reason NATO still exists is because countries feel safer inside it than not. Sweden and Finland haven't suddenly acquired an enthusiasm for US imperialism. Countries in the Warsaw Pact did not feel safer inside it. In fact the threat cames from within, namely the Soviet Union. Witness the invasions of Hungary and Czechoslovakia simply for going off message. NATO's rush eastwards was caused by the distrust of these countries towards Russia. They also feel safer inside the alliance. Georgia and Ukraine and Moldova have demonstrated they were right. The Soviet Union was crap. It relied on terror to keep the system working. Once Gorbachev reduced the terror, the whole thing collapsed and he was condemned for not anticipating this would happen or having anything in place afterwards. There wasn't any terror after Stalin died. And from my point of view a few decades of political repression isn't as bad as, say, a couple of centuries of racial oppression like good old uncle Sam. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongTimeLurker Posted September 1, 2022 Share Posted September 1, 2022 17 minutes ago, Detournement said: There wasn't any terror after Stalin died... Maybe not anything like as bad but it still wasn't a fun place to live if there was any sort of protest against the government: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novocherkassk_massacre 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted September 1, 2022 Share Posted September 1, 2022 2 hours ago, Fullerene said: The main reason NATO still exists is because countries feel safer inside it than not. ... because their populations are white and their territory doesn't have oil wealth to plunder. States wanting to be pishing out of the tent with the only superpower in the world is entirely understandable without resorting to claptrap about their safety. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted September 1, 2022 Share Posted September 1, 2022 1 hour ago, Detournement said: There wasn't any terror after Stalin died. And from my point of view a few decades of political repression isn't as bad as, say, a couple of centuries of racial oppression like good old uncle Sam. Weird that they had to lock all the doors to stop people leaving for the evil West though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dorlomin Posted September 1, 2022 Share Posted September 1, 2022 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-62750584 Quote The chairman of Russia's Lukoil oil giant, Ravil Maganov, has died after falling from a hospital window in Moscow, reports say. Maganov, 67, was being treated at the city's Central Clinical Hospital and died from his injuries, sources told Russian media. He is the latest of a number of high-profile business executives to die in mysterious circumstances. Shortly after Russia invaded Ukraine, Lukoil called for the war to end. Early in March, the Lukoil board called for the conflict in Ukraine to end as soon as possible, expressing its sympathy to victims of "this tragedy". Ravil Maganov took over as chairman of Lukoil's board two years ago. He began working for the private oil company in 1993. In May a former senior manager at Lukoil, Alexander Subbotin, reportedly died also under unusual circumstances. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted September 1, 2022 Share Posted September 1, 2022 33 minutes ago, welshbairn said: Weird that they had to lock all the doors to stop people leaving for the evil West though. 1 million Bulgarians have left their country since 1991, and its population is expected to shrink by a further 2 million by 2050 within the EU. Lithuania's population has dropped by 23% since Soviet rule ended and it gained independence. Latvia has lost one-fifth of its population since EU accession in 2004. But please tell us more about how Soviet political repression was responsible for people wanting to live in western Germany and run around Munich in a Merc all day. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted September 1, 2022 Share Posted September 1, 2022 Fun bonus point: If it weren't for Western Europe's own locked door policy on migrants coming from Ukraine, then there'd have been several million fewer inhabitants living there by the time of the Russian invasion. A large portion of the refugee population won't be returning even if Ukraine retakes its 2014 borders and becomes a shining model of democracy. They're fine living in western Europe now thank you very much. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted September 1, 2022 Share Posted September 1, 2022 4 minutes ago, virginton said: 1 million Bulgarians have left their country since 1991, and its population is expected to shrink by a further 2 million by 2050 within the EU. Lithuania's population has dropped by 23% since Soviet rule ended and it gained independence. Latvia has lost one-fifth of its population since EU accession in 2004. But please tell us more about how Soviet political repression was responsible for people wanting to live in western Germany and run around Munich in a Merc all day. Polish emigration shot up when they joined the EU, but dropped right back as their economy grew. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted September 1, 2022 Share Posted September 1, 2022 45 minutes ago, welshbairn said: Weird that they had to lock all the doors to stop people leaving for the evil West though. There are people that are queuing up on the Mexican border to get into the USA who will end up as agricultural slaves. Migration is a mirror image of economic inequality. People want to live in the West to benefit from the wealth stolen from the global south. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted September 1, 2022 Share Posted September 1, 2022 This is from a big Ukranian channel. Who could be devising these suicidal tactics with no regard for Ukranian life? It was never in doubt. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Jean King Posted September 1, 2022 Share Posted September 1, 2022 This thread gets more like reading the RT social media channels by the day. I'm surprised a few are not being head hunted by them ! 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted September 1, 2022 Share Posted September 1, 2022 The collaborating Governor of occupied Zaporizhzhya has decided it's safer running the place from Crimea. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongTimeLurker Posted September 1, 2022 Share Posted September 1, 2022 Russia has really lost the plot now. Bald & Bankrupt kicked out and banned from reentry: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.