Jump to content

Clydebank 2023/2024


Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, mike strutter said:

Which is a disgrace , if they were to win it this season it would basically be another wasted season for those who wish to progress to the LL … surely this needs to be addressed.

How is it a disgrace? The licensing process has been closed by the SFA for over a year, can’t even apply just now.  And if teams spending big like Clydebank to try and get promotion and they can’t do it is not a team like Beith’s fault.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, beithboy said:

How is it a disgrace? The licensing process has been closed by the SFA for over a year, can’t even apply just now.  And if teams spending big like Clydebank to try and get promotion and they can’t do it is not a team like Beith’s fault.  

And have you  come up to the standard to the licensing just asking not a dig.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, judge macbrayne said:

And have you  come up to the standard to the licensing just asking not a dig.

You know we have not and you know the reasons why they have been out there for long enough.   Planing permission for floodlights are in now though. But as I said right now it makes no difference if we were compliant as the SFA  are not allowing any further applications at this time, and have not for over a year. As far as the ground being compliant goes floodlights are the only stumbling block. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, beithboy said:

You know we have not and you know the reasons why they have been out there for long enough.   Planing permission for floodlights are in now though. But as I said right now it makes no difference if we were compliant as the SFA  are not allowing any further applications at this time, and have not for over a year. As far as the ground being compliant goes floodlights are the only stumbling block. 

Well sorry you should not be in this league 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, judge macbrayne said:

Well sorry you should not be in this league 

 

So you are proposing to throw out half the league because they don’t have a license, that’s hilarious.  Perhaps another criteria is that you have your own ground and don’t ground share.  Get rid of another few teams.  

Edited by beithboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mike strutter said:

Which is a disgrace , if they were to win it this season it would basically be another wasted season for those who wish to progress to the LL … surely this needs to be addressed.

Can only be addressed if your club win the league and rightly enter a play off to the LL. You looking for the playoff being awarded to the highest place licensed club???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beith continually punch above their weight at this level we have been fortunate to win a few leagues and cups in recent times that have elevated our status to being named comfortably among the favourites for trophies at the start of every season without maybe having the financial leverage that clubs such as Darvel, Pollok and Clydebank have and now also the new breed of clubs St Cadocs and Gartcairn we continue to challenge however due to being a well run club with a great management team and a playing squad who continue to outshine some of our more illustrious opponents , don’t know why we get so many people who seem to take exception to a well run club that stays within its parameters winning the league just because they can’t gain promotion, the answer to that is maybe have a look at your own team and stop moaning Beith will be ready when they can and not before .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, the nearly man said:

Beith continually punch above their weight at this level we have been fortunate to win a few leagues and cups in recent times that have elevated our status to being named comfortably among the favourites for trophies at the start of every season without maybe having the financial leverage that clubs such as Darvel, Pollok and Clydebank have and now also the new breed of clubs St Cadocs and Gartcairn we continue to challenge however due to being a well run club with a great management team and a playing squad who continue to outshine some of our more illustrious opponents , don’t know why we get so many people who seem to take exception to a well run club that stays within its parameters winning the league just because they can’t gain promotion, the answer to that is maybe have a look at your own team and stop moaning Beith will be ready when they can and not before .

Beith are financially more fortunate than Clydebank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, beithboy said:

So you are proposing to throw out half the league because they don’t have a license, that’s hilarious.  Perhaps another criteria is that you have your own ground and don’t ground share.  Get rid of another few teams.  

The WOS should have laid a time period for Premier clubs to become license compliant and avoid having lost playoff places.

Clearly, Beith have had other issues with the ground ownership etc and it’s pleasing that it seems to be getting somewhere now though the license process being closed or paused is obviously another stumbling block that they could have done without.

There are earlier posters (possibly another thread) suggesting that Beith wouldn’t want to go up which doesn’t really make any sense. I don’t understand why any club would have moved from West Juniors to WoS if they had no ambition to move up from tier 6.

Edited by not man of the match
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, not man of the match said:

Beith are financially more fortunate than Clydebank.

That’s hilarious, you’ve spent £25,000 on three strikers in the last 6 months  we’ve not spent that in the last sixteen years.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...