Jump to content

Group F 🇹🇷🇬🇪🇵🇹🇨🇿


Recommended Posts

Just now, PauloPerth said:

That lassie in the studio is horrendous to listen to, but unfortunately wants to talk a lot.

She has the well suited BBC 'middle England' accent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, The Master said:

Not being able to score with your arm at all is actually one of the better handball-related rule changes. 

Why is the arm a magically illegal body part in the build-up to a goal, as opposed to literally every other way in which a goal can be scored? 

Why is an elbow treated the same as palming/punching the ball with a hand?

Bearing in mind that handball is not automatically penalised in any other situation in the game, the current system is just back of fag packet nonsense with no logical purpose. 

Quote

It’a clear and unambiguous, with the only scope for contention being the marginal “was it actually the arm?” decisions.

So not actually clear and not actually unambiguous at all then. 🤡

The handball rule was devised to clearly separate football from rugby tactics in the early development of the sport: it already served that purpose. 

And now the Czechs are 1-0 down in a crucial game because of such utter nonsense impacting a perfectly legitimate goal. 

Edited by vikingTON
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve just realised the female pundit is that dickhead Lioness striker from a few years back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheScarf said:

I’ve just realised the female pundit is that dickhead Lioness striker from a few years back. 

Makes me feel a little less petty that she’s still as dislikeable when not wearing an England top. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, parsforlife said:

Impossible for the ref to give any other decision.

Too many people wanting to debate over what they'd like the decision to be vs what the correct decision should be based on the laws of the game and instructions given to referees.

^^^ Mike Mulraney found 

If the current laws of the game - devised on the back of a fag packet a handful of years ago, because VAR demanded 'Objectivity' - are a crock of shite, then that is an entirely valid topic of debate. 

That referees are applying that officially sanctioned crock of shite to the game is not being questioned. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DrewDon said:

Did she just say that Czech Republic had looked "sexually dangerous" from set pieces? 

Sounded like that, but it was “exceptionally dangerous”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DrewDon said:

Did she just say that Czech Republic had looked "sexually dangerous" from set pieces? 

Going in recklessly from behind imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...