Jump to content

What is the point of labour ?


pawpar

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, orfc said:

Ooh, nasty names! Lose your temper, lose the argument shunny 🙂

Trust me there was zero anger describing you as I did, odd to think that anyone who describes you as a fukwit or insular is by default "angry". You made it glaringly obvious with your position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The primary job of MPs is to represent the constituents who elect them. On the issue of what Israel is doing in Gaza, there is a clear majority of the UK electorate wanting the UK government to push for a ceasefire. That majority is higher still among Labour constituencies. Yet because Starmer has been whipping his MPs into not voting for ceasefire motions, he has been denying Labour MPs the chance to do their jobs properly. Denying them the ability to represent in parliament the democratic will of their constituents. That much is objective fact. We can then subjectively speculate on why he's doing it. My guess is he's more concerned about appealing to Tory voters in swing seats and their potential sensibilities on this issue than he is about Labour voters. Of course, this is going to piss off both Labour MPs and Labour voters. In Scotland, there's an attempt to shield Starmer from backlash to his chicanery by blaming the SNP. Due to existing biases here, that's probably finding some reception. However, nobody in England and Wales is falling for it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Leith Green said:

I see that Hoyle -after saying last week that the SNP Gaza motion could now be debated in parliament - has decided to pull his own promise.

A man of integrity, indeed............

You'll be hard pressed to find any media coverage on it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meanwhile welsh health minister during pandemic,  currently vying to become welsh devolved leader, 

Admits deleting his WhatsApp during pandemic 

Barely a squeak in the media 

As opposed to the 2 weeks coverage nicola got

Hmm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Binos said:

Meanwhile welsh health minister during pandemic,  currently vying to become welsh devolved leader, 

Admits deleting his WhatsApp during pandemic 

Barely a squeak in the media 

As opposed to the 2 weeks coverage nicola got

Hmm

That’s because nobody cares about wales. 

Edited by MazzyStar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 27/02/2024 at 09:14, Freedom Farter said:

The primary job of MPs is to represent the constituents who elect them. 

It's to represent the constituents, but it isn't to represent the views of their constituents. Otherwise we would have SNP politicians campaigning to remain in the UK and we would still have the death penalty. 

Edited by sparky88
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, orfc said:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/mar/01/george-galloway-profiting-pain-gaza-rochdale

*cough cough*

"The MPs of the Scottish National party are, of course, sincere in their outrage at the plight of Gaza. But few would argue that the ceasefire motion they tabled last week – which triggered such ructions in the Commons – was aimed solely at helping Palestinians in need. It was also designed to expose and widen the rift within the ranks of their electoral rivals, Labour"

Looks like that notorious right wing rag the guardian agrees with me, and not with the vacant twenty on this thread 🙂

For the sake of absolute clarity, Galloway would not be an MP if Labour hadn't completely and utterly fucked up. Starmer's promise of quality candidates in every constituency at the GE is a fucking belter. What chance does he have of getting 650 lined up when he couldn't manage 1. Useless c**t.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, orfc said:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/mar/01/george-galloway-profiting-pain-gaza-rochdale

*cough cough*

"The MPs of the Scottish National party are, of course, sincere in their outrage at the plight of Gaza. But few would argue that the ceasefire motion they tabled last week – which triggered such ructions in the Commons – was aimed solely at helping Palestinians in need. It was also designed to expose and widen the rift within the ranks of their electoral rivals, Labour"

Looks like that notorious right wing rag the guardian agrees with me, and not with the vacant twenty on this thread 🙂

You used the term Pallywood to allege Gazan victims were faking their suffering. You promoted a racist conspiracy theory. Sit the rest of this one out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
10 hours ago, Derry Pele said:

Diane Abbott: MP denied chance to speak during Commons race debate

In a PMQs dominated by comments made by a Tory donor about her, Diane Abbott rose at least 46 times to ask a question but did not get to speak. Funny how the Speaker could “use his discretion” the other week but not today

Yep, and Hoyle attempting to justify it on the basis that many other MP's sought to intervene in the debate.  That weak argument quickly falls apart on the fact that as far as we know none of these other MP's had been targeted as Diane Abbott has.  In the context of the PMQ session she should have been allowed to contribute.

Hoyle has become a liability as Speaker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See Abbott has an article in the Independent today which primarily focuses on the Tories & Hester, but also mentions Labour's own failures on racism and sexism, including their failure to act on the Forde Report. Cue a massive amount of blatant lying from Labour figures on TV today claiming the recommendations of that report have been implemented in full, when no such thing has happened to the point that Forde himself went to the media to complain about it.

Meanwhile, Labour are using the Hester scandal to fundraise, sending the following email out:

20240314_152955.jpg.feda7a492e120917263f84fa677de44d.jpg

Abbott is currently suspended from the whip and has been for 11 months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Labour now dropping their worker's rights program other than in a purely symbolic sense. Something extremely vague will be presented in the first 100 days but all detail now to be worked out through consultation with business leaders per the FT.

It's good stuff guys

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keir Hardie one of the Labour Party founders would be shocked at what the present Labour Party has turned into.

Hardie in Parliament spoke once on how great the wealth of the nation had become but instead of the wealth bringing comfort to the masses it had instead brought increased burdens to the masses.

Sound familiar?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...