Bacchus Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 48 minutes ago, Jacksgranda said: And this time it is a penalty... Through my green tinted glasses the hearts player put his arms out to block the cross then quickly brought them into his chest to plead his innocence. The camera clearly shows his arms out stretched when the ball hit the arm. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LuboMoravcik Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 2 minutes ago, stressball said: I really can’t stick Palma, he’s been rotten for awhile and coasted on a couple of trivellas. Agree. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bacchus Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 2 minutes ago, stressball said: I really can’t stick Palma, he’s been rotten for awhile and coasted on a couple of trivellas. Not my cup of tea either, He is not a team player 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bacchus Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 For me Engles was good but hearts right back Taylor was man of the match 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paranoid android Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 I don't think many of us were expecting anything from this game, and it wasn't the doing a lot of us were expecting, but it's another routine defeat in Glesgae. I'm pissed off at the Baningame thing, though - that'll be him f**ked again, no doubt - first game back in ages - shouldn't have played longer than an hour, but Naismith thinks he's the master at managing his resources. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insert Amusing Pseudonym Posted September 14 Author Share Posted September 14 We played alright. We lost. On to next week. I've had my say on handball penalties plenty times. Scales has his arms out but it's too close for me to be wanting that as a pen. Do I think VAR wrote have overturned it at the other end, no I do not 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC92 Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 We did play ok - Taylor in particular was very good and Halkett is starting to look more like his old self - but I wasn't concerned about our ability to make things difficult for the opposition when we want to. The fundamental issues are at the other end and today didn't tell us anything new on that score. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorgie greatness Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 I’d say the Celtic penalty is the same as the rangers pen first game which we got zip from! one rule for us etc etc 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC92 Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 What are the limitations to the "proximity" argument? Can you block the ball with an outstretched arm as long as you're within a yard or two of the strike? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorgie greatness Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 34 minutes ago, DC92 said: What are the limitations to the "proximity" argument? Can you block the ball with an outstretched arm as long as you're within a yard or two of the strike? It’s if your wearing a hooped shirt. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeartsOfficialMoaner Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 Celtic were unlucky with a call last season at Tynecastle. Brendan then went on a rant and called out Beaton. That was funny. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacky1990 Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 (edited) Dont think the Scales one was a penalty. Not only is he very close, but looks like it hits his shoulder anyway. Penrice one is unlucky and i hate game changing penalties being given for that. Need a tiered punishment for handball in the box. Indirect freekick or corner would have been enough imo. Edited September 14 by Jacky1990 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jinky67 Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 (edited) 4 hours ago, DC92 said: What are the limitations to the "proximity" argument? Can you block the ball with an outstretched arm as long as you're within a yard or two of the strike? Wasn’t about the proximity, it’s where it hit. If it hits your arms above the t-shirt line it isn’t a penalty which is what it appears to be in this case. From 1 angle it almost looks like his shoulder which shows how high up the arm it hit Edited September 14 by Jinky67 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jinky67 Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 4 hours ago, Gorgie greatness said: It’s if your wearing a hooped shirt. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacky1990 Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 14 minutes ago, Jinky67 said: Wasn’t about the proximity, it’s where it hit. If it hits your arms above the t-shirt line it isn’t a penalty which is what it appears to be in this case. From 1 angle it almost looks like his shoulder which shows how high up the arm it hit Good patter youve chosen a graphic that shows a guy in green and white = no handball, but the red = handball. Fair play if deliberate. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stressball Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 5 hours ago, DC92 said: What are the limitations to the "proximity" argument? Can you block the ball with an outstretched arm as long as you're within a yard or two of the strike? Probably an intentional movement... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gannonball Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 (edited) I get why Hearts fans were irate about the penalties and would have been inclined to agree with them however as @Jinky67 has shown and watching sportscene this morning Craigen explains pretty well how VAR got it right as how the rules go. I would agree with @Jacky1990however there definitely needs to be a tier system for handball in the box with indirect free kicks, as in my eyes that's what both of them should be. Edited September 15 by gannonball 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingjoey Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 12 hours ago, Gorgie greatness said: I’d say the Celtic penalty is the same as the rangers pen first game which we got zip from! one rule for us etc etc The Rangers one, the ball is going to hit Barron on another part of his body if it doesn't hit his arm. The Celtic one, the ball is flying into the box if the Hearts player doesn't stop it with his arm. Good improvements to the handball laws this season. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 1 hour ago, gannonball said: I get why Hearts fans were irate about the penalties and would have been inclined to agree with them however as @Jinky67 has shown and watching sportscene this morning Craigen explains pretty well how VAR got it right as how the rules go. I would agree with @Jacky1990however there definitely needs to be a tier system for handball in the box with indirect free kicks, as in my eyes that's what both of them should be. Indirect free kick for handball in the box, unless it’s denying a goal. Only sensible outcome if we insist on this being the handball rule. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moomintroll Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 24 minutes ago, Dons_1988 said: Indirect free kick for handball in the box, unless it’s denying a goal. Only sensible outcome if we insist on this being the handball rule. I am fully on board with anything that brings more of the glorious chaos that is an Indirect free kick in the Penalty box. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.