bullywee Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 (edited) ^^^ grief tourist ^^^ indeed. You can take your ostentatious head-shaking and tongue-clucking and fucking choke on it, you fucking simpleton. Edited January 13, 2010 by bullywee 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Div Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 How many years that been now? It will be 1,000 days soon so expect there to be a new media frenzy then. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny van Axeldongen Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 (edited) I wish Kate and Gerry all the very best in their ongoing search for money Maddie. Edited January 13, 2010 by Johnny van Axeldongen 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kirkyblue2 Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 This game of hide and seek has got way out of hand. Everyone is going to feel a tad foolish if she has been under her bed the whole time. She's under a bed, a sea bed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santana Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 Why does Maddie McCann not play the Xbox? Because I've got a PS3. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTChris Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 Wihle I think the McCann's were clearly negligent I don't think they killed their child. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Phoenix Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 Wihle I think the McCann's were clearly negligent I don't think they killed their child. You've just murdered an apostrophe. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bibby Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 They did a Lance Armstrong and released those 'Look for Maddie' wristbands. Proves how pathetic this whole affair is. I really hope Kate and Gerry are jailed for media rape. The Philomena thread in P&B Gold is the only good thing to come out of this mountain-out-of-a-mole-hill tirade on the public. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenny Craigie Boii Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 She is under my bed at just this moment. I bought her for 5000 euros on Sunday. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bibby Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 Yes, it truely is pathetic that two parents have killed their kid, panicked, and subsequently over-played the media card. And her sister and brother have lost their sister? Of course their going to rape the media if it meant/means they can deflect attention away from themselves. Fixed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broken Algorithms Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Fixed. Fantastic. And your evidence for this is? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Outrage on behalf of the McCann family is so Page 11. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Master Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Awww... I'd totally forgotten all about her until now. It's like The Game (which I've now just lost, incidentally). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bibby Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Fantastic. And your evidence for this is? There's also no evidence to prove otherwise. I see it as a 50/50 that they killed her (or covered her death in some way), and what they (the McCann's) suggest happened. I'm not angry that they might've killed her, I'm angry they are using the outrageous bandwagon and sympathy attributes of the British people to their own desires. They go on Oprah and GMTV to 'find information', where infact they probably know themselves what happened, and will continue to milk any positive or negative media coverage. FWIW, I think they found her dead and covered up her death. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enigma Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Outrage on behalf of the McCann family is so Page 11. That was 70 pages ago. I think it is about time it made a comeback. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broken Algorithms Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 I'm not angry that they might've killed her, I'm angry they are using the outrageous bandwagon and sympathy attributes of the British people to their own desires. They go on Oprah and GMTV to 'find information', where infact they probably know themselves what happened, and will continue to milk any positive or negative media coverage. Yes, because they're going to turn round and say to GMTV "Nah, f**k off we don't want to find our daughter". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bibby Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Yes, because they're going to turn round and say to GMTV "Nah, f**k off we don't want to find our daughter". Exactly. Because they seek attention. Sure, they're distraught about their 'loss', and in my eyes, guilty. Even if they are innocent, they've went about this the wrong way. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pink Freud Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Exactly. Because they seek attention. Sure, they're distraught about their 'loss', and in my eyes, guilty. Even if they are innocent, they've went about this the wrong way. Of course they seek attention you fucking buffoon. They've lost their daughter. So I suppose this is just an elaborate wee game of double bluff? If we keep this in the media, noone will think it's us? What are you studying, muppet? I hope it's neither law nor media studies. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bibby Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Of course they seek attention you fucking buffoon. They've lost their daughter. So I suppose this is just an elaborate wee game of double bluff? If we keep this in the media, noone will think it's us? What are you studying, muppet? I hope it's neither law nor media studies. Who shat in your cornflakes? Can't remember any Stephen Lawrence wristbands or Sarah Payne's parents flying to Rome to have a wee chinwag with the Pope. Anyone with half a brain realises this whole media-frenzy is OTT. Part of being the media's fault itself, obviously. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pink Freud Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Who shat in your cornflakes? Can't remember any Stephen Lawrence wristbands or Sarah Payne's parents flying to Rome to have a wee chinwag with the Pope. Anyone with half a brain realises this whole media-frenzy is OTT. Part of being the media's fault itself, obviously. Noone's disputing that though. But coming out with pish like "they're guilty" and "Attention seeking" is almost amoeba like in its lack of constructive thought. THey have lost a child - they'll take any and every bit of exposure they can to keep it in the news. And Stephen Lawrence (though what the f**k that has to do with child abduction is beyond me) was still making the headlines years after the murder. Perhaps the reason that there were no wristbands was because...now it's a tricky one this, so stay with me......they knew where he was? -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.