Islay

If Traynor didn't agree with Hutton's comments, why did he not properly challenge him at the time when they were both live on the radio? Complete shitebag of a man.

So what right does every other club in SFL1, with the current exception of Dundee due to the 'Club 12' debacle as that is a different debate entirely, have over Dunfermline to now be in the division above them? They finished below us in the overall standings and were nowhere near a promotion place in SFL1, the only team that effectively won promotion from that division was Ross County.

Unless I have this completely misinterpreted, you are suggesting that Dunfermline are relegated below all of the teams in SFL1? So the top league consists of all the current SPL teams and everyone in the SFL1 apart from Dunfermline?

To paraphrase Yorkston, he suggested that some people just couldn't be arsed. Apparently it was feasible, but nobody wanted to exert any effort into making it all work.

According to RM we are all pssst ***** loving c***s. I'm confused...just what exactly are we?

I'm quite happy to disregard EdinburghLivi's opinion (I usually do) as Husbands is only 21 years old and is clearly nowhere near his full potential as a footballer. How old was he when he appeared for Livi back when they were in the third division?

Unless I am going completely mental, or we have time warped, it quotes our boards statement from today. Edited to add, it was published two days ago. However web pages can be updated and our boards statement, or at last a selected piece of our boards statement, has been added to the page.

Everyone else was able to grasp the simple concept on 'No' from our boards statement. However STV have used selective quoting and focussed on the Dunfermline and Dundee 'Club 12' scenario, completely ignoring the vital part of our boards statement where we state our position as a definite 'No'. STV Link 'Dunfermline Board statement: "Matters are currently being progressed in an illogical manner, as the SPL should have met and voted on the Rangers situation definitively. Thereafter, if there is to be change a joint presentation should be made by all the Scottish Football governing bodies together and not on an ad hoc basis as at present."Despite asking for some direction or clarification, we have had no communication whatsoever from the SPL as to the rationale, rule reference or justification as to why Dundee FC is being proposed to take the place of "Club 12" rather than DAFC. We are requesting in writing a definitive response from the SPL by the 5th July to allow both ourselves and Dundee FC to plan for next season." Likely vote: Unclear' Nice one STV, that is misinformation that Traynor would be proud of. On the subject of our boards statement I have only linked it earlier without providing comment. I don't feel I need to comment, this emoticon sums it up perfectly:

Dunfermline Board Vote No

It's already being 'abused' by Dundee fans.

The seethe level has shot off the chart

It's a bit like the This 'n' That card trick. There is going to be an unexpected reveal at the end which will confuse everyone, even more so than they are now, with the constant shuffling that is going on.

"The players would be playing for the same club - Rangers - in front of the same fans" Somebody should maybe enforce the bad news on poor Ally, he is in complete denial...

There is delusional, then there is the case for being sectioned. That individual is a definite case for the latter.

"Craig Wilson‏@CraigWilson90 @TomEnglishSport Your an idiot" Surely if you are going to call someone an idiot then the correct use of grammar is essential?

Whatever it is, there is no doubt that some form of moron is involved.

It's an inadvertent oxymoron.

We pay our taxes and don't owe our debt to the bank. Quite legit to me.

You've lost me...

Yorkston Lambasts Dodds If I was Dodds I would just stop communicating whatsoever and become a mute until this entire Rangers scenario blows over.

Can anyone explain the adoration of Barrowman? He has failed at the majority of clubs he has represented. If Jeffries can replace him with Kevin Kyle and keep Kyle fit then the man is a genius.

He doesn't, it's conjecture like most of his ramblings.

The Courier has a bit about Boyle and Barrowman. I knew about Boyle before they published the story though however I wasn't told about Barrowman.

Boyle has been told to find a new club.

My source has delivered well so far. We are searching for a completely new back four by the sounds of it, obviously McMillan is still there. The young (decent) defenders from the U21's are being promoted for back-up. With Barrowman told he can go as well then Jeffires will be searching for that target man style striker, if we can get Kevin Kyle fully fit then he will be lethal in this league with the likes of Whittle and Cardle providing the service to proven goalscorers like Kyle, Kirk and Wallace. if Buchanan signs on then that is a potent strikeforce for this level.