Jump to content

7-2

Gold Members
  • Posts

    9,037
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by 7-2

  1. 3 minutes ago, Forest_Fifer said:

    Had they started building the framework for the new one before the season ended to save time?

    1 minute ago, jamamafegan said:

    Think they did that so that they could continue playing at Tynie whilst work was started, speeding up the process.

    That makes sense. Still a bit strange seeing the new work grow around it now whilst big parts of the old stand's still there. It's great for seeing the different sizes of stands though!

     

  2. IMG_6340.JPG.603a401a4f2fb8f5bccb96f37670ccd6.JPG

    Not being in the building trade my knowledge of such things is virtually nil but I don't understand why they are constructing the new stand around the ever decreasing old one. I'd have thought they'd totally demolish the old one, clear the site and then start the new build. Seems a bit of a complicated way of doing things to the untrained eye.

  3. 14 hours ago, PauloPerth said:

    It's more a case of knowing what you're getting. Anyone from down south within our wage budget would likely be lower leagues and a gamble along Coulson lines, or foreign and an even bigger gamble!

    There is always the chance you take a punt and it works out well as it did with Dunne.

    I just feel, as a wide player of a proven quality for us, who would be a realistic signing possibility, that I can't think of too many better options.

    But as Radford says, it is possible he's completely outwith our reach in terms of wages.

    Sadly though Scottish football is at the level where an English lower league guy could easily be of acceptable standard. Yes Coulson was a shocker but buying internally doesn't guarantee quality, Rory Fallon, or a previously decent player not working out, John Sutton. 

    I don't think we should re-sign MOH but I couldn't name another option through lack of knowledge on budgets and other players. Don't think that makes the opinion any less valid though.

  4. 31 minutes ago, Kyle said:

    Chris Harvey @ChristopherHarv 56s56 seconds ago

    Pitch perfect at McDiarmid Park. Squinting into the sunshine. Hopefully done Saints transfer news on Stv tonight at six.pic.twitter.com/iP9pZ4nsA

    Intriguing.
     
    If they've called in STV, I don't see it being a complete huddy...

    Interesting that it's only hopeful there'll be 'done' news yet he's there. maybe the ex-Rochdale and Port Vale guy is playing hard to get.

  5. 27 minutes ago, PauloPerth said:

    I'd take O'Halloran back in a second. Would be a great option for us. Playing under a manager who knows how to get the best out of him would be good for all parties.

    For those slating him, love to hear the long list of wide players in this league outwith Celtic/ Aberdeen who would be better options...

    Its been quite a while since the transfer market was restricted to only this league Paulo. 

  6. That's a fair point about the Scottish Leagues name. I've very rarely heard it called the Ladbrokes Premiership etc. Compare that to the standing joke about the Barclay's Premier League. It all just helps show what an amateur set up it is and that even Ladbrokes can't be too bothered or they'd have the clubs and media briefed to death about the name, the way Barclay's PR team obviously did in England.

  7. 2 hours ago, BigFatTabbyDave said:

    I resorted to referring to the leagues as "tiers" some time ago. It just feels like absolute fannydangle to be calling the third tier "League One", and it makes life less confusing when you're referring to previous seasons in League One, which could feasibly anything from the Scottish second tier to the top three leagues in England.

    Spot on. It's a nightmare when checking a players history and you don't know which league they actually played in because of all the name changes.

  8. http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/st-johnstone-boss-tommy-wright-10641022

    I'm including this because it is almost a template for the media's negativity agenda. Yesterday Saints make a cracking signing in Scougall yet the Daily Ranger make what should be nothing but a good news piece into a negative one by turning it into Tommy Wright having a go at Steve Brown for not keeping a squad player that went to a Championship club 5 or 6 days ago. If the two are related in any way it would be for a back up player having to go to free up wages for a big signing but oh no, its apparently a major fall out that's bigger news than the actual signing itself. Their mindset truly is unreal at times.

  9. 2 minutes ago, perthsaint1977 said:

    Yeah so if he signs the player he wants to for LB everyone will scratch their head as to me to be classed as experienced you need to be experienced to the league you will be playing in. This player won't have ever played in the top league. All a bit bizarre.

    Have to disagree with you on this one. Going by your definition Scougall is inexperienced. It's to do with playing senior games as opposed to Under-20's etc no matter the league. You can't class a player with say 250 Championship appearances as inexperienced.

×
×
  • Create New...